Skip to main content

Prospective study of anterior transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) for the management of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Assessment of the 2-year outcome of anterior Prolift™ for women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This is a prospective study which was conducted in a tertiary unit in the North West of England and comprised 36 consecutive women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Methods

Women were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. Women completed the Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL), Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-Short Form (PISQ-12), and postoperatively, the Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire. Women were examined using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q). Anatomical success was defined as stage ≤1 prolapse in the anterior compartment. Main outcome measures Postoperative POP-Q stage, quality of life domains and mesh exposure rate.

Results

Preoperatively all but two women had stage 2 or greater anterior vaginal wall prolapse. At a mean follow-up of 24.6 months, 19 women (53%) had stage ≤1 anterior wall prolapse. Fifteen women had stage 2 anterior wall prolapse and two women had stage 3 prolapse. Twenty-nine women felt improvement in their prolapse symptoms. 16 women were sexually active preoperatively, of whom seven reported worsening dyspareunia. There was poor correlation between anatomical and functional outcomes. Seven women had mesh exposure. Five needed revision in theatre.

Conclusions

Anterior Prolift™ for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse has 53% anatomical success rate in the medium term, with mesh exposure rate of 19%. Majority of patients felt overall improvement in their symptoms, but this did not correlate with the anatomical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Freeman RM, Lose G (2009) The great mesh debate. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(8):889–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1299–1304, discussion 304 –6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(7):743–752

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacquetin B, Cosson M (2009) Complications of vaginal mesh: our experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(8):893–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. NICE (2008) Surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse using mesh. Interventional procedure guidance 267 London: NICE. Available at: [www.nice.org.uk].

  6. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapoor DS, Nemcova M, Pantazis K, Brockman P, Bombieri L, Freeman RM (2009) Reoperation rate for traditional anterior vaginal repair: analysis of 207 cases with a median 4-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(1):27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2008) Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Raalte HM, Lucente VR, Molden SM, Haff R, Murphy M (2008) One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):694, e1-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(3):176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14(3):164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL, Schaffer J, Chen Z et al (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):600–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ek M, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, Kjaeldgaard A, Rezapour M, Rudnicki M et al (2009) Urodynamic assessment of anterior vaginal wall surgery: a randomized comparison between colporraphy and transvaginal mesh. Neurourol Urodyn 29(4):527–531

    Google Scholar 

  15. Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR (2005) Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG 112(8):1134–1138

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, Lim J, Leong A, Krause H et al (2009) Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 116(10):1380–1386

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lowman JK, Jones LA, Woodman PJ, Hale DS (2008) Does the Prolift system cause dyspareunia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Chen SS, Lin TY, Hsieh CH et al (2009) Short term impact on female sexual function of pelvic floor reconstruction with the prolift procedure. J Sex Med 6(11):3201–3207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hinoul P, Ombelet WU, Burger MP, Roovers JP (2008) A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. North CE, Ali-Ross NS, Smith AR, Reid FM (2009) A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 116(9):1251–1257

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Conflicts of interests

A Fayyad received travel sponsorship from Pfizer, Astellas and Ethicon Gynecare and speaker honorarium from Pfizer and Astellas. C North, none. F Reid, received travel sponsorship from Pfizer and speaker honorarium from Pfizer and Boston Scientific. ARB Smith, received lectures and consultation agreements with Johnson and Johnson and Astellas.

Details of ethical approval

This study was approved by the Clinical Governance Committee of Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust. As this study is part of service evaluation after introduction of Prolift into clinical practice, ethical approval was not needed to report the data in this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdalla M. Fayyad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fayyad, A.M., North, C., Reid, F.M. et al. Prospective study of anterior transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) for the management of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22, 157–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1260-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1260-8

Keywords

  • Prolapse
  • Anterior wall
  • Mesh
  • Prolift™
  • Recurrent
  • Erosion