Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

A subset of neurologically normal females void by efficient Valsalva, not detrusor contraction. We determined the incidence of urinary retention following midurethral sling (MUS) placement in women that void by detrusor contraction versus Valsalva.

Methods

Review of patients undergoing MUS insertion between 2002 and 2009 for urodynamic stress incontinence was performed. Women with concomitant pelvic surgery, previous incontinence surgery, or preoperative incomplete bladder emptying were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on preoperative urodynamic findings—those that voided with a detrusor contraction >10 cm of water and those that voided by Valsalva.

Results

One hundred seven patients were available for analysis. The postoperative urinary retention rate was 22% and 5% in the Valsalva and non-Valsalva groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Mean retention duration was 3 weeks for each cohort (range 1–6).

Conclusions

Women voiding by Valsalva are at increased risk of urinary retention following MUS placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MUS:

Midurethral sling

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

PVR:

Postvoid residual

VLPP:

Valsalva leak point pressure

PdetQmax:

Voiding detrusor pressure at maximum urine flow

PTFE:

Polytetrafluoroethylene

References

  1. Petros P, Ulmsten U (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty. An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morey AF, Medendorp AR, Noller MW et al (2006) Transobturator versus transabdominal mid urethral slings: a multi-institutional comparison of obstructive voiding complications. J Urol 175:1014–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paick J, Cho MC, Oh S et al (2007) Factors influencing the outcome of mid urethral sling procedures for female urinary incontinence. J Urol 178:985–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charalambous S, Touloupidis S, Fatles G et al (2008) Transvaginal versus transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19:357–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones R, Abrams P, Hilton P et al (2010) Risk of tape-related complications after TVT is at least 4%. Neurourol Urodyn 29:40–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B et al (2001) Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology 58:697–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barron KI, Savageau JA, Young SB et al (2006) Prediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. Int Urogynecol J 17:570–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P et al (2007) Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomized trial comparing TVT and TVT-O. Int Urogynecol J 18:1257–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller ER (1996) Physiology of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin N Am 23:171–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1984) Urodynamic predictability of voiding following incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 63:85–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL et al (2003) Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol 169:2234–2237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Debodinance P, Delporte P, Engrand JB et al (2002) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: 3 years experience involving 256 operations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 105:49–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinberger MW, Ostergard DR (1996) Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluoroethylene suburethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol 87:50–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H et al (2008) Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol 189:2076–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duckett JR, Patil A, Papanikolaou NS (2008) Predicting early voiding dysfunction after tension-free vaginal tape. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:89–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wheeler TL, Richter HE, Greer WJ et al (2008) Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol 179:600–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C et al (2007) Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol 51:782–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None

Funding

None

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Corey O’Connor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pham, K.N., Topp, N., Guralnick, M.L. et al. Preoperative Valsalva voiding increases the risk of urinary retention after midurethral sling placement. Int Urogynecol J 21, 1243–1246 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1177-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1177-2

Keywords

Navigation