Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aimed to validate a symptom questionnaire to assess presence and patient bother as related to common pelvic floor disorders.

Methods

The validation of the Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire (PFBQ) included evaluation of internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and validity of the items.

Results

A total of 141 patients with mean age of 61.8 ± 13.2 were included in the study. Twenty-four percent of patients complained of stress urinary incontinence, 14.9% mixed incontinence, 14.9% urge incontinence, 10% fecal incontinence, 5.7% obstructed defecation, 28.4% pelvic organ prolapse, and 2.1% dyspareunia. The PFBQ demonstrated good reliability (α = 0.61-0.74; ICC = 0.94). There was a strong agreement beyond chance observed for each question (k = 0.77-0.91). PFBQ correlated with stage of prolapse (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.0001), number of urinary and fecal incontinence episodes (ρ = 0.81, p < 0.0001; ρ = 0.54, p < 0.0001), and obstructed defecation (ρ = 0.55, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The PFBQ is a useful tool that can be easily used for identification and severity or bother assessment of various pelvic floor symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bump RC, Norton PA (1998) Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:723–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369:1027–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TC, Mitchinson AR, Walters MD (1997) Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 89:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez-argente FX, Jain J, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2001) Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44(7):920–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC (2001) Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1388–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms for two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 & PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS et al (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Qual Life Res 3:291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA et al (1995) Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn 14:131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hull TL, Floruta C, Piedmonte M (2001) Preliminary results of an outcome tool used for evaluation of surgical treatment for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:799–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61(1):37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Gabriel P. Suciu, M.S.P.H., Ph.D. for assistance in statistical analysis.

Conflicts of interest

G. Willy Davila: Consultant and speaker: AMS, Watson, Astellas, CL Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Willy Davila.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, T.V., Karp, D.R., Aguilar, V.C. et al. Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 21, 1129–1135 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1148-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1148-7

Keywords

Navigation