Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of maternal weight on the new onset of stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence and severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in primigravid women at term and its association with maternal body weight.

Methods

This was an observational study of 458 primigravid women who came to give birth at Donostia Hospital during 2007. Urinary symptoms were investigated (2002 ICS definitions), and a physical examination including height, weight, pelvic floor muscle strength, and fetal presentation was performed. We calculated the incontinence severity index (ISI) and the women answered the International Consultation on Incontinence short form questionnaire.

Results

SUI affected 139 (30.3%) primigravid women. The ISI distribution was 40.3% slight, 54.7% moderate, 4.3% severe, and 0.7% very severe. Pregnant women at term with body weight ≥75 kg appear to have more than doubled the risk of presenting SUI.

Conclusions

The incidence of SUI is high in pregnancy. Increased maternal body weight at term is an independent risk factor for incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanton SL, Kerr-Wilson R, Grant Harris V (1980) The incidence of urological symptoms in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol 87:897–900

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Viktrup L, Lose G, Rolf M, Barfoed K (1993) The frequency of urinary symptoms during pregnancy and puerperium in the primipara. Int Urogynecol J 4:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaliha C, Kalia V, Stanton SL, Monga A, Sultan AH (1999) Antenatal prediction of postpartum urinary and fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 94:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grutz A, Gordon D, Keidar R, Lessing JB, Wolman I, David MP et al (1999) Stress urinary incontinence: prevalence among nulliparous compared with primiparous and grand multiparous premenopausal women. Neurourol Urodyn 18:419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van der Bom JG, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2006) How do the prevalences of urogenital symptoms change during pregnancy? Neurourol Urodyn 25:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wesnes SL, Rortveit G, Bo K, Hunskaar S (2007) Urinary incontinence during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 109:922–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolan LM, Walsh D, Hamilton S, Marshall K, Thomson K, Ashe RG (2004) A study of quality of life in primigravidae with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 15:160–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. King JK, Freeman RM (1998) Is antenatal bladder neck mobility a risk factor for postpartum stress incontinence? Br J Obstet Gynecol 105:1300–1307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgio KL, Zyczynski H, Locher JL, Richter HE, Redden DT (2003) Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 102:1291–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Viktrup L, Rortveit G, Lose G (2006) Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108:248–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Unemori EN, Amento EP (1990) Relaxin modulates synthesis and secretion of procollagenase and collagen by human dermal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 265:10681–10685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hvidman L, Foldspang A, Mommsen S, Nielsen JB (2002) Correlates of urinary incontinence in pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J 13:278–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150–1157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rortveit G, Hannestad YS, Daltveit AK, Hunskaar S (2001) Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Obstet Gynecol 98:1004–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiarelli P, Brown W, McElduff P (1999) Leaking urine: prevalence and associated factors in Australian women. Neurourol Urodyn 18:567–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scarpa KP, Herrmann V, Palma PCR, Riccetto CLZ, Morais SS (2006) Prevalence and correlates of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy: a survey at UNICAMP Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int Urogynecol J 17:219–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgio KL, Locher JL, Zyczynski H, Hardin JM, Singh K (1996) Urinary incontinence during pregnancy in a racially mixed sample: characteristics and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J 7:69–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A, Lapitain MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2005) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Health Publication, Plymouth, pp 257–311

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chiarelli P, Campbell E (1997) Incontinence during pregnancy. Prevalence and opportunities for continence promotion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 37:66–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S (2000) A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn 19:137–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandvik H, Espuña M, Hunskaar S (2006) Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing test. Int Urogynecol J 17:520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Espuña Pons M, Rebollo Alvarez P, Puig Clota M (2004) Validation of the Spanish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire-short form. A questionnaire for assessing the urinary incontinence. Med Clin (Barc) 122:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frawley HC, Galea MP, Phillips BA, Sherburn M, Bø K (2006) Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourol Urodyn 25:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristianson P, Samuelsson E, von Schoultz B, Svardsudd K (2001) Reproductive hormones and stress urinary incontinence in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:1125–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a research project supported by the Spanish Health Department, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI070261).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Diez-Itza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diez-Itza, I., Ibañez, L., Arrue, M. et al. Influence of maternal weight on the new onset of stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women. Int Urogynecol J 20, 1259–1263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0923-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0923-9

Keywords

Navigation