Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Body mass index as a risk factor for cystotomy during suprapubic placement of mid-urethral slings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aims to investigate whether body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for cystotomy during sling placement via suprapubic approach for stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed for suprapubic mid-urethral sling placement between June 2005 and October 2007. Data collected included demographics, BMI, and history of prior and concomitant procedures. Primary outcome was cystotomy during sling placement.

Results

Of 198 women identified, 129 had a BMI < 30 kg/m2 and 69 had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. There were 18 (14.0%) cystotomies in the BMI < 30 kg/m2 group and three (4.3%) in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 group (p = 0.04). BMI < 30 kg/m2 remained a risk factor for cystotomy after controlling for confounders (OR 4.63, 95% CI 1.20–17.86), as did prior anti-incontinence surgery (OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.01–12.50).

Conclusions

BMI < 30 kg/m2 may be a risk factor for cystotomy during sling placement utilizing the suprapubic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Hayek S, Abrams P (2004) Women's lower urinary tract function and dysfunction: definitions and epidemiology. Minerva Ginecol 56:311–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A (1991) The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JG, Hadley HR, Luber KM et al (1997) Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 158(3 Pt 1):875–880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP (2002) The effect of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder symptoms on quality of life in young women. BJU Int 90:544–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N (2001) The tension-free vaginal tape procedure is successful in the majority of women with indications for surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Bjog 108:414–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Richter HE, Norman AM, Burgio KL, Goode PS, Wright KC, Benton J et al (2005) Tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective subjective and objective outcome analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Novara G, Galfano A, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V et al (2008) Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 53:288–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. LaSala CA, Schimpf MO, Udoh E, O'Sullivan DM, Tulikangas P (2006) Outcome of tension-free vaginal tape procedure when complicated by intraoperative cystotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1857–1861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McLennan MT, Melick CF (2005) Bladder perforation during tension-free vaginal tape procedures: analysis of learning curve and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 106(5 Pt 1):1000–1004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P, Jomaa M, Lanner L, Nilsson CG et al (1998) A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9:210–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andonian S, Chen T, St-Denis B, Corcos J (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing suprapubic arch sling (SPARC) and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT): one-year results. Eur Urol 47:537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tseng LH, Wang AC, Lin YH, Li SJ, Ko YJ (2005) Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:230–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lord HE, Taylor JD, Finn JC, Tsokos N, Jeffery JT, Atherton MJ et al (2006) A randomized controlled equivalence trial of short-term complications and efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape and suprapubic urethral support sling for treating stress incontinence. BJU Int 98:367–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, Kalliola T, Rinne K, Takala T et al (2007) Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 109:4–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lovatsis D, Gupta C, Dean E, Lee F (2003) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure is an ideal treatment for obese patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1601–1604; discussion 4–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth J. Geller.

Additional information

Poster Presentation at the 2008 American Urogynecologic Society Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, September 4–6, 2008

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunivan, G.C., Connolly, A., Jannelli, M.L. et al. Body mass index as a risk factor for cystotomy during suprapubic placement of mid-urethral slings. Int Urogynecol J 20, 1127–1131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0915-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0915-9

Keywords

Navigation