Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development of an Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire for patients undergoing pelvic floor physiotherapy in the treatment of stress incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this paper is to develop a motivation questionnaire regarding perseverance in pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) supervised by physiotherapists for stress urinary incontinence.

Methods

Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in women with stress urinary incontinence that revealed 15 common themes; 117 items were constructed and reviewed by continence advisors. Surviving items (n = 73) were administered to 210 women. Data were analysed for item properties, factor analysis was used to examine the questionnaire structure and tests of convergence/divergence used to check for sensitivity.

Results

The Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ) comprises 18-items in five scales, assessing attitudes towards treatment (72.62% of explained variance; α = 0.87), reasons for not doing PFMT (55.73%; α = 0.74), living with incontinence (62.70% variance; α = 0.70), desire for treatment (65.37% variance; α = 0.74) and the effect of incontinence severity on PFMT (51.62% variance, α = 0.68). Scales were generally sensitive to known group differences.

Conclusions

This study represents the first effort to develop a motivation scale for PFMT. This validated Motivation Questionnaire is an instrument to test the impact of motivation upon cure, in PFMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol and Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hay-Smith EJC, Dumoulin C (2006) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005654 Review.

  3. Moore KH, O’Sullivan RJ, Simons A, Prashar S, Anderson P, Louey M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of nurse continence advisor therapy versus standard urogynaecology regime for conservative incontinence treatment: efficacy, costs and two year follow up. BJOG 110:649–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nygaard IE, Kreder KJ, Lepic MM, Fountain KA, Rhomberg A (1996) Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 174:120–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diokno A, Yuhico M (1995) Preference, compliance and initial outcome of therapeutic options chosen by female patients with urinary incontinence. J Urol 154:1727–1730 discussion 1731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartlett JA (2002) Addressing the challenges of adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 29(Suppl 1):S2–S10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Rodgers WM, Murnaghan DM (2002) Determinants of exercise intention and behavior in survivors of breast and prostate cancer: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Cancer Nurs 25:88–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A (2002) The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke 33:444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Rodgers WM, Fraser SN, Murray TC, Daub B et al (2003) Is the theory of planned behavior a useful framework for understanding exercise adherence during phase II cardiac rehabilitation? J Cardiopulm Rehabil 23:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Halberstadt Y, Cermak T, Heiller I (1998) Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med and Rehabil 79:475–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedrich M, Gittler G, Arendasy M, Friedrich KM (2005) Long-term effect of a combined exercise and motivational program on the level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 30:995–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson AJ, Pantalon MV, Cohen KR (1999) Motivational interviewing and treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually diagnosed patients. J of Nerv Ment Dis 187:630–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tappin DM, Lumsden MA, Gilmour WH, Crawford F, McIntyre D, Stone DH et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial of home based motivational interviewing by midwives to help pregnant smokers quit or cut down. BMJ 331:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore KH (2000) Conservative therapy for incontinence. Balliere Clin Obstet Gynaecol 14:251–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laycock J (1994) Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schussler B, Laycock J, Norton P et al (eds) Pelvic Floor Reeducation. Springer, London, pp 42–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guadagnoli E, Velicer W (1998) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedhazur E, Schmelkin L (1991) Measurement, Design and Analysis: An integrated approach. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  19. Streiner D, Norman G (2006) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 3rd edn. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simoneau H, Bergeron J (2003) Factors affecting motivation during the first six weeks of treatment. Addict Behav 28:1219–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alewijnse D, Mesters I, Metsemakers J, Adriaans J, van den Borne B (2001) Predictors of intention to adhere to physiotherapy among women with urinary incontinence. Health Educ Res 16:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alewijnse D, Metsemakers JF, Mesters IE, van den Borne B (2003) Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle exercise therapy supplemented with a health education program to promote long-term adherence among women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 22:284–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bo K, Kvarstein B, Nyggard I (2005) Lower urinary tract symptoms and pelvic floor muscle exercise adherence after 15 years. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 105:999–1005

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karantanis E, Stanton S, Parsons M, Robinson D, Blackwell A, Cardozo L et al (2003) Women’s preferences for treatment for stress incontinence—physiotherapy or surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 22:522–523

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Wendy Allen, Hayley Leek, Katrina Parkin (research nurses and continence advisors), Janette O’Toole (pelvic floor physiotherapist) and Emmanuel Karantanis and William Kutessa (Urogynaecologists), for assistance with questionnaire design. We thank Kerrie Burgess for her assistance with administration of questionnaires.

Funding

The printing of questionnaires was funded by the Pelvic Floor Trust Fund. Staff costs were obviated by our 4th year medical student who assisted with this study as part of an Independent Learning Project (ILP) module with the University of New South Wales.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate H. Moore.

Additional information

The work was carried out at the Pelvic Floor Unit, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia 2217.

Appendix1: Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ)

Appendix1: Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ)

Instructions

  • When completing these questions, please just circle the number that best describes you. There are no wrong or right answers.

  • If you make a mistake, just cross out your first answer, and provide another answer.

Table 7

Please check that you have answered all the questions.

Scoring

$$ {\text{MQS}}1 = \left( {{{\left( {{\text{Q}}1 + {\text{Q}}2 + {\text{Q}}3 + {\text{Q}}4} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{Q}}1 + {\text{Q}}2 + {\text{Q}}3 + {\text{Q}}4} \right)} 4}} \right. } 4}} \right). $$
$$ {\text{MQS}}2 = \left( {{{\left( {{\text{Q}}5 + {\text{Q}}6 + {\text{Q}}7 + {\text{Q}}8} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{Q}}5 + {\text{Q}}6 + {\text{Q}}7 + {\text{Q}}8} \right)} 4}} \right. } 4}} \right). $$
$$ {\text{MQS}}3 = \left( {{{\left( {{\text{Q}}9 + {\text{Q}}10 + {\text{Q}}11} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{Q}}9 + {\text{Q}}10 + {\text{Q}}11} \right)} 3}} \right. } 3}} \right). $$
$$ {\text{MQS}}4 = \left( {{{\left( {{\text{Q}}12 + {\text{Q}}13 + {\text{Q}}14} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{Q}}12 + {\text{Q}}13 + {\text{Q}}14} \right)} 3}} \right. } 3}} \right). $$
$$ {\text{MQS}}5 = \left( {{{\left( {{\text{Q}}15 * + {\text{Q}}16 * + {\text{Q}}17 + {\text{Q18}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{Q}}15 * + {\text{Q}}16 * + {\text{Q}}17 + {\text{Q18}}} \right)} 4}} \right. } 4}} \right). $$

*Reverse score before scoring.

MQS1 “Positive attitude towards treatment”

MQS2 “Excuses for not doing PFE”

MQS3 “Living with incontinence”

MQS4 “Treatment participation”

MQS5 “Motivation to maintain PFE”

A note about scoring:

  • The scales have been designed so that scores from each of the scales fall on a common range, between 1 and 5, where the higher the score the more motivated the respondent to participate in PFE. Because of the different number of items within scales, the sum of raw scores for all items in each scale is divided by the number of items in the scale. This ensures that the scales have a common score range and that the results are very easy to quickly interpret. For example, any score in the range of 1-2 would indicate very weak motivation to participate in PFE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarma, S., Hawthorne, G., Thakkar, K. et al. The development of an Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire for patients undergoing pelvic floor physiotherapy in the treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 20, 1085–1093 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0907-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0907-9

Keywords

Navigation