Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL): translation and validation study of the Iranian version

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Because of the importance and prevalence of incontinence among women, there is increasing interest in the development and use of well-constructed questionnaires studying quality of life. Also, there is a paucity of information on QOL in non-Western women suffering from urinary incontinence. The aim of this study was to translate the original English version of the I-QOL and to assess the reliability and validity of this questionnaire in Iranian patients with urinary incontinence.

Methods

Four hundred women with urinary incontinence completed the Persian version of the questionnaire. By Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed.

Results

The median age of the respondents was 48 years (range 27–90). The overall I-QOL summary score showed internal consistency of 0.96 (Cronbach’s alpha). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 for the total score. The range of correlation between the I-QOL total score and the subscales of the Sf-36 and the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) questionnaires were between 0.47 to 0.59 and 0.52 to 0.61 respectively.

Conclusion

The Persian version of the I-QOL can be used for measuring QOL in urinary incontinent women in Iran.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S et al (2006) Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 50:1306–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F, Boutin JM, Bertrand P, Lanson Y (2002) Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. BJU Int 89:61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nojomi M, Ensieh Bibi A, Bashiri Rad R (2008) Urinary incontinence: hospital-based prevalence and risk factors. J Res Med Sci 13:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fultz NH, Herzog AR (2001) Self-reported social and emotional impact of urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:892–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Temml C, Haidinger G, Schmidbauer J, Schatzl G, Madersbacher S (2000) Urinary incontinence in both sexes: prevalence rates and impact on quality of life and sexual life. Neurourol Urodyn 19:259–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley CS, Rovner ES, Morgan MA, Berlin M, Novi JM, Shea JA et al (2005) A new questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohsj K (2006) Is a generic quality of life instrument helpful for evaluating women with urinary incontinence? Qual life Res 15:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grimby A, Milson I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P (1993) The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Aging 22:82–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes V (1991) The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:976–977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Baverndam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP (1996) Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Adult Urol 47:67–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross S, Soroka D, Karahalios A, Glazener CA, Hay-Smith EJ, Drutz HP (2006) Incontinence specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:272–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdanian M, Gandek B (2005) The short form health survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 14:875–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dupuy HJ (1984) The psychosocial general well-being (PGWB) index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD et al (eds) Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. LeJacq, New York, pp 170–183

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ady LA (1991) Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide. Jossy-Bass, San Francisco, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patrick DL (2000) A revised quality of life instrument specific to persons with stress, urge and mixed types of urinary incontinence, HRA1996, No. 97

  16. Patrick DL (1999) Cultural adaptation of a quality of life measure for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 36:427–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP (1999) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 53:71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Anne Skalicky for giving us permission to use the I-QOL in order to validate the Iranian version.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzieh Nojomi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nojomi, M., Baharvand, P., Moradi lakeh, M. et al. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Int Urogynecol J 20, 575–579 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0808-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0808-y

Keywords

Navigation