Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to estimate the incidence and identify the risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. We conducted a case control study among 6,214 women who underwent hysterectomy from 1982 to 2002. Cases (n = 32) were women who required vaginal vault suspension following the hysterectomy through December 2005. Controls (n = 236) were women, randomly selected from the same cohort, who did not require pelvic organ prolapse surgery. The incidence of vaginal vault prolapse repair was 0.36 per 1,000 women-years. The cumulative incidence was 0.5%. Risk factors included preoperative prolapse (odds ratio (OR) 6.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–28.4) and sexual activity (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0–1.5). Vaginal hysterectomy was not a risk factor when preoperative prolapse was taken into account (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5–1.8).Vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy is an infrequent event and is due to preexisting weakness of pelvic tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POP:

pelvic organ prolapse

OR:

odds ratio

CI:

confidence interval

TAH:

total abdominal hysterectomy

VH:

vaginal hysterectomy

LAVH:

laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy

TLH:

total laparoscopic hysterectomy

BMI:

body mass index

HT:

hormonal replacement therapy

USO:

unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

BSO:

bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

References

  1. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D (2004) Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 104:489–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:579–585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L (1998) Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:13–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrington JW, Edwards G (2000) Posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruikshank SH, Kovac SR (1996) Anterior vaginal wall culdoplasty at vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posthysterectomy anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1863–1869 discussion 9–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Symmonds RE, Pratt JH (1960) Vaginal prolapse following hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 79:899–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110:625–632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mecacci F et al (1999) True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 44:679–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baden W, Walker T (1992) Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Käser O, Ikle F, Hirsch H (1985) Atlas of gynecological surgery. Thieme-Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cruikshank SH, Cox DW (1990) Sacrospinous ligament fixation at the time of transvaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:1611–1615 discussion 5–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D et al (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:795–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dietz HP, Eldridge A, Grace M, Clarke B (2004) Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:95–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R (2003) Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1261–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Symmonds RE, Williams TJ, Lee RA, Webb MJ (1981) Posthysterectomy enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:852–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding source

This study was conducted with the support of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University of Geneva.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Dällenbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dällenbach, P., Kaelin-Gambirasio, I., Jacob, S. et al. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1623–1629 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0718-4

Keywords

Navigation