Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical properties of raw meshes used in pelvic floor reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are common conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical properties of raw meshes commonly used in pelvic floor surgery, particularly the effects of cyclical loading on these meshes. The material properties of nine different types of surgical meshes were examined using uniaxial tensile tests. The strength and extensibility of the mesh designs differed considerably. Most mesh types exhibited curvilinear loading curves. Cyclical loading of mesh samples produced significant permanent deformation in all mesh designs. This non-recoverable extension ranged from about 8.5% to 19% strain. Hysteresis also varied considerably between materials from 30% to 85%. All mesh groups tested for their biomechanical properties displayed differences in results for failure load, stiffness, non-recoverable extension and hysteresis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmont MA et al (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baessler K, Maher CF (2006) Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risk and benefits. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:560–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2003) Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implanted materials. Int Urogynecol J 14:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Afonso JS, Martins PALS, Girao MJB, Natal Jorge RM, Ferreira AJM, Mascarenhas T et al (2008) Mechanical properties of polypropylene mesh used in pelvic floor repair. Int Urogynecol J 19:375–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosson M, Debodiance P, Boukerrou M, Chauvet MP, Lobry P, Crepin G, Ego A (2003) Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material? Int urogynecol J 14:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettema GJC, Goh JTW, Forwood MR (1998) A new method to measure elastic properties of plastic-viscoelastic connective issue. Med Eng Phys 20:308–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goh JTW (2002) Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int Urogynecol J 13:76–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett MB, Ker RF, Dimery NJ, Alexander R (1986) Mechanical properties of carious mammalian tendons. J Zool, Lond 209:537–548

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maganaris CN, Paul JP (2000) Hysteresis measurements in intact human tendon. J Biomech 33(12):1723–1727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Belle J, Brodsky B, Berman HM (1995) Hydration structure of a collagen peptide. Structure 3:893–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robins SP, Shimokomaki M, Bailey AJ (1973) The chemistry of the collagen cross-links. Age-related changes in the reducible components of intact bovine collagen fibres. Biochem J 131:771–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Jean-Charles C, Dubois P, Cosson M (2008) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J 19:811–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goh JTW (2003) Biomechanical and biochemical assessment for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:391–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Krause.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, H., Bennett, M., Forwood, M. et al. Biomechanical properties of raw meshes used in pelvic floor reconstruction. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1677–1681 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0711-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0711-y

Keywords

Navigation