Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transvaginal bone-anchored sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: effect of Valsalva leak point pressure and prior pelvic surgery on outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of lower Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) and previous pelvic surgery on outcomes following sling surgery is controversial. We assessed outcomes following bone-anchored sling (BAS) placement in patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD) and previous pelvic surgery. A retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing BAS placement was performed. Patients were stratified by VLPP (≥60, <60, and <30) and by history of previous anti-incontinence/pelvic floor surgery. Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire comprising validated urogenital distress inventory (UDI)-6, incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ)-7 questionnaires and additional items addressing satisfaction. In comparing the three VLPP cohorts, the percentage of patients reporting incontinence episodes of <1/week (64%, 68%, and 63%, respectively) and postoperative UDI/IIQ questionnaire scores were similar (p > 0.2, all comparisons). Lower rates of patients achieving <1 episode of incontinence per week (50%; p = 0.07) and worse UDI/IIQ scores (p = 0.02) were associated with patients with ≥2 prior surgeries. Whereas results are similar following BAS in patients with or without varying degrees of ISD, worse outcomes are associated with prior surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1993) An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol (Suppl) 153:1–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilberti C, Rovida S (2000) Transvaginal bone-anchored synthetic sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 56:956–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbone A, Palleschi G, Ciavarella S, Morello P, Tomiselli G, Parascani R et al (2004) Experience with a bone anchored sling for treating female stress urinary incontinence: outcome at 30 months. BJU Int 93:780–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrams P, Cardoza LD, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobashi KC, Leach GE (2003) Fascial slings. In: Stanton SL, Zimmern PE (eds) Female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Springer, London, pp 113–114

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Reilly KJ, Govier FE (2002) Intermediate term failure of pubovaginal slings using cadaveric fascia lata: a case series. J Urol 167:1356–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bullock TL, Ghoneim G, Klutke CG, Staskin DR (2006) Advances in female stress urinary incontinence: mid-urethral slings. BJU Int 98(Suppl 1):32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin AT, Wang SJ, Chen KK, Chang LS (2005) In vivo tension sustained by fascial sling in pubovaginal sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 173:894–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rechberger T, Wrobel A, Adamiak A, Skomra D, Korobowicz E, Tomaszewski J et al (2003) Tissue reaction to polypropylene mono- or multi-filament tapes used in surgical techniques of stress urinary incontinence treatment. Ginekol Pol 74:1008–1013

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grischke EM, Heinrich D, Auer L, Kubli F (1987) Significance of the examination position in urodynamic assessment of female urinary incontinence. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 47:707–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz HP, Ellis G, Wilson PD, Herbison P (2004) Voiding function after tension-free vaginal tape: a longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44:152–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg RP, Tchetgen MB, Sand PK, Koduri S, Rackley R, Appell R et al (2004) Incidence of pubic osteomyelitis after bladder neck suspension using bone anchors. Urology 63:704–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan DM, Dunn RL, Fenner DE, Faerber G, Delancey JO, Mcguire EJ et al (2007) Comparative analysis of urinary incontinence severity after autologous fascia pubovaginal sling, pubovaginal sling and tension-free vaginal tape. J Urol 177:604–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritel X, Zabak K, Pigne A, Demaria F, Benifla JL (2002) Predictive value of urethral mobility before suburethral tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in women. J Urol 168:2472–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dawson T, Lawton V, Adams E, Richmond D (2007) Factors predictive of post-TVT voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1297–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Connor RC, Nanigian DK, Lyon MB, Ellison LM, Bales GT, Stone AR (2006) Early outcomes of mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence stratified by Valsalva leak point pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 25:685–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muller M, Koebele A, Deval B (2007) Determinants of success and recurrence after suburethral free tape procedure for female urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 36:19–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez LV, de Almeida F, Dorey F, Raz S (2004) Does Valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal polypropylene sing? Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol 172:210–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hodroff MA, Sutherland SE, Kesha JB, Siegel SW (2005) Treatment of stress incontinence with the SPARC sling: intraoperative and early complications of 445 patients. Urology 66:760–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ward KL, Hilton P (2004) A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Rapp and Nazemi have no disclosures. Dr. Kobashi discloses an affiliation with Novartis, Coloplast, and Astellas. Dr. Govier discloses an affiliation with American Medical Systems, Eli Lilly, and Novartis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Rapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapp, D.E., Nazemi, T.M., Kobashi, K.C. et al. Transvaginal bone-anchored sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: effect of Valsalva leak point pressure and prior pelvic surgery on outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1211–1215 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0622-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0622-y

Keywords

Navigation