Skip to main content
Log in

Is evidence an ethic?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ostergard DR (2007) Lessons from the past: directions for the future. Do new marketed surgical procedures and grafts produce ethical, personal liability, and legal concerns for physicians? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:591–598

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swift SE (2007) “First do no harm” and the emerging story of the vaginal reconstructive mesh implant. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:983–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pauls RN (2007) Nip, tuck and rejuvenate: the latest frontier for the gynecologic surgeon. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:841–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kass LR (1985) Toward a more natural science. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whitehouse PJ, Juengst E, Mehlman M, Murray TH (1997) Enhancing cognition in the intellectually intact. Hastings Cent Rep 27:14–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James L. Whiteside.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whiteside, J.L. Is evidence an ethic?. Int Urogynecol J 19, 745–746 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0617-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0617-8

Navigation