Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a significant problem in Nepal. Surgical treatment is scarcely available and little is known of the results of POP surgery on women living under burdensome circumstances. The aim of our study was to set up a follow-up program in rural Nepal and evaluate POP surgery. In 2004 and 2006, 74 women with a POP from remote areas around Dhulikhel Hospital underwent prolapse surgery. Together with local contacts men, a plan was made to implement a follow-up program. All the operated patients were invited to a follow-up visit in March 2007. Thirty-three (45%) patients attended the follow-up: 85% (n = 28) found the effect of the procedure an improvement. A satisfactory anatomic outcome was found in 93% (n = 32). A remarkable finding was the reduction in physical labour after the surgical procedure in 50% of the follow-up cases. Some adjustments in the follow-up program may contribute to a higher participation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonetti TR, Erpelding R, Pathak LR (2002) Reproductive morbidity—a neglected issue? A report of a clinical based study in Far Western Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal Ministry of Health, GTZ and UNFPA
Tuladhar H (2005) An overview of reproductive health of women in Bajhang district. Nepal Med Coll J 7:107–111
Amatya S (2006) Fallen womb: the hardest burden for a woman to bear. UN chronicle, Sept–Nov
Pradhan A, Aryal R, Regmi G, Ban B, Govindasamy P (1997) Nepal Family Health Survey 1996. His Majesty′s Government, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu
Rana A (2006) Reducing morbidity from uterovaginal prolapse in Nepalese women through surgical camps: an ambitious approach. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1:1–3
Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CMA, Adams EJ and Hagen S (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4. Art.No: CD004014. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub2
Gill EJ, Hurt WG (1998) Pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Urogynecol Pelvic floor Dysfunct 25(4):757–769
Bodner-Adler B, Shrivastava C, Bodner K. (2007) Risk factors for uterine prolapse in Nepal. Int Urogynecol J DOI 10.1007/s00192-007-0331-y
Baden WF, Walker TA, Lindsey JH (1968) The vaginal profile. Tex Med 64:56–58
Chawla CD Hebbar S (2005) Comparison of modified MMK operation vs Kelly’s plication for female stress incontinence. Calicut Med J 3(4):e4
Wall LL, Versi E, Norton P, Bump R (1998) Evaluating the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:877–879
Roovers JPWR, Vaart van der CH, Bom van der JG, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Scholten PC, Heintz APM (2004) A randomized trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery of patients with descensus uteri grade II–IV. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111:50–56
Tegerstedt G, Hammerström M (2004) Operation for pelvic organ prolapse: a follow-up study. Act Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:758–763
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the women who were willing to participate in the study and the staff of Dhulikhel Hospital for the support in executing this follow-up program.
The local medical ethical committee of Dhulikhel Hospital gave permission for the follow-up study.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaaf, J.M., Dongol, A. & van der Leeuw-Harmsen, L. Follow-up of prolapse surgery in rural Nepal. Int Urogynecol J 19, 851–855 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0542-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0542-2