Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed primary sub-urethral tape procedures. A total of 16 patients were identified, and their data from symptom-specific questionnaires, urodynamic studies and urogynaecological assessment were collected. At a median follow-up of 24.5 months, objective and subjective cure rates were 54.5% and 92.9%, respectively. Average satisfaction score regarding outcome after surgery was 9.3 on a rating scale from 0 to 10. All but one patient had symptoms of urge incontinence pre-operatively with 64.3% experiencing cure or improvement post-operatively. Voiding difficulties were observed in one patient, and post-operative urodynamics revealed a significant decrease in urinary flow rate (p < 0.05) but with no difference in urinary residuals or maximum urethral closure pressure. Severe peri-urethral fibrosis was identified in 62.5% of the patients. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is an effective and safe surgical option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nilsson CG, Falconer C, Rezapour M (2004) Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104:1259–1262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ward KL, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group (2004) A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardozo L, Hextall A, Bailey J et al (1999) Colposuspension after previous failed incontinence surgery: a prospective observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:340–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amaye-Obu FA, Drutz HP (1999) Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1296–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thakar R, Stanton S, Prodigalidad L et al (2002) Secondary colposuspension: results of a prospective study from a tertiary referral centre. BJOG 109:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maher C, Dwyer P, Carey M et al (1999) The Burch colposuspension for recurrent urinary stress incontinence following retropubic continence surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:719–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL (1995) Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:740–745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarvis GJ (1994) Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:371–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kjolhede P, Ryden G (1997) Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of women with recurrent urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dean N, Ellis G, Wilson P et al (2006) Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD002239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maher C, Qatawneh A, Baessler K et al (2004) Laparoscopic colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for recurrent stress urinary incontinence and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency—a randomised controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 23:433–434

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moore RD, Speights SE, Miklos JR (2001) Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:389–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baessler K, O’Neill S, Maher C et al (2004) A validated female pelvic floor questionnaire for clinicians and researchers. Neurourol Urodyn 23:398–399

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valpas A, Nilsson CG (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape procedure and laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16:319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezapour M, Ulmsten U (2001) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence—a long-term follow up. Int Urogynecol J 12(Suppl 2):S9–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riachi L, Kohli N, Miklos J (2002) Repeat tension-free transvaginal tape (TVT) sling for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 13:133–135, discussion 135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore RD, Gamble K, Miklos JR (2007) Tension-free vaginal tape sling for recurrent stress incontinence after transobturator tape sling failure. Int Urogynecol J 18:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flynn BJ, Yap WT (2002) Pubovaginal sling using allograft fascia lata versus autograft fascia for all types of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year minimum followup. J Urol 167:608–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Monga AK, Robinson D, Stanton SL (1995) Periurethral collagen injections for genuine stress incontinence: a 2-year follow-up. Br J Urol 76:156–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Khullar V, Cardozo LD, Abbott D et al (1997) GAX collagen in the treatment of urinary incontinence in elderly women: a two year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:96–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R et al (1987) The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol 69:399–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koonings PP, Bergman A, Ballard CA (1990) Low urethral pressure and stress urinary incontinence in women: risk factor for failed retropubic surgical procedure. Urology 36:245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bidmead J, Cardozo L, McLellan A et al (2001) A comparison of the objective and subjective outcomes of colposuspension for stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108:408–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanton SL (1985) Stress incontinence: why and how operations work. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 12:369–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bombieri L, Freeman RM, Perkins EP et al (2002) Why do women have voiding dysfunction and de novo detrusor instability after colposuspension? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109:402–412

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva M. De Cuyper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Cuyper, E.M., Ismail, R. & Maher, C.F. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J 19, 681–685 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0506-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0506-6

Keywords

Navigation