Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sedation and local anaesthesia for vaginal pelvic floor repair of genital prolapse using mesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study of the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the vaginal pelvic floor repair with mesh (PFR-Mesh) procedure was used. The procedure is originally named TVM. All 55 patients in the series were operated upon under sedation and local anaesthesia as pain relief. The objectives were twofold. Firstly, the objective was to evaluate peri-operative and immediate post-operative complications. Secondly, the objective was to evaluate the feasibility of performing these relatively complex procedures under sedation and local anaesthesia. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to record pain during and after the operations. At a follow-up visit 8–12 weeks post-operatively, a self-instructed questionnaire evaluating subjective opinions of the operation itself and the post-operative period was handed in. Of the 55 patients, anterior, posterior and total PFR-Mesh procedures were performed in 39 (71%), 12 (22%) and 4 (7%) patients, respectively. Mean age was 68 years (52–93). All patients could be operated as scheduled under sedation and local anaesthesia. Mean operative time was 38 min (26–70). Peri-operative complications consisted of two cases of bladder perforation with the superior needle in an anterior repair and vaginal perforation with the inferior needle also in an anterior repair. At the conclusion of the operation VAS was recorded to be 0–3 in 65% of the patients. There were no immediate post-operative complications. Out of 55 patients, 35 (64%) left the ward on the day of operation whilst the remaining 20 (36%) patients stayed for only one night. The safety of the PFR-Mesh procedure and the feasibility of performing these procedures under sedation and local anaesthesia were demonstrated. However, expertise in vaginal surgery is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brubaker L (2005) Controversies and uncertainties: abdominal versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:690–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mølsted-Pedersen L, Rudnicki M, Lose G (2006) Transvaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse using autologous fascia lata graft. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:874–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M (2004) Functional and anatomic outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miklos JR, Sze EH, Karram MM (1995) Vaginal correction of pelvic organ relaxation using local anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 86:922–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jomaa M (2001) Combined tension-free vaginal tape and prolapse repair under local anesthesia in patients with symptoms of both urinary incontinence and prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Invest 51:184–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore RD, Miklos JR (2003) Colpocleisis and tension-free vaginal tape sling for severe uterine and vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence under local anesthesia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:276–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Axelson SM, Bek KM (2004) Anterior vaginal wall repair using local anesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 112:214–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchsbaum GM, Duecy EE (2005) Local anesthesia with sedation for transvaginal correction of advanced genital prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:2173–2176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berrocal J, Clavé H, Cosson M, Debodinance PH, Garbin O, Jacquetin B, Rosenthal C, Salet-Lizée D, Villet R (2004) Conceptual advances in the surgical management of genital prolapse. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 33:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse using uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LaSala AC, Schimpf OM (2007) Occurrence of postoperative hematomas after prolapse repair using a mesh augmentation system. Obstet Gynecol 109:569–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Fifty percent of the cost of the PFR-Mesh system was financed by Johnson & Johnson Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Folke Flam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flam, F. Sedation and local anaesthesia for vaginal pelvic floor repair of genital prolapse using mesh. Int Urogynecol J 18, 1471–1475 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0350-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0350-8

Keywords

Navigation