Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

From “data mining” to “salami publication”—how (not) to present data

  • Editorial
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ward K, Hilton P; United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-free Vaginal Tape Trial Group (2002) Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 325(7355):67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194. http://www.consort-statement.org/

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Moedling Hospital, Moedling, Austria

    Paul Riss

Authors
  1. Paul Riss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Riss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riss, P. From “data mining” to “salami publication”—how (not) to present data. Int Urogynecol J 18, 121–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0253-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0253-0

Search

Navigation