Abstract
Intrauterine contraceptive device is the most popular method of reversible contraception in developing countries due to its efficiency and low cost. However, this device is often inserted by paramedics of variable skills, and follow-up evaluations are irregular or absent which can be the source of major complications. The authors report six cases of intravesical migration of intrauterine contraceptive devices complicated by bladder stones. All the six cases were managed endoscopically with excellent outcome. The authors demonstrate that this major complication can be managed endoscopically with decreased morbidity for the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chamary VL (1995) An unusual cause of iatrogenic bladder stone. Br J Urol 76:138
Eckford SD, Persad RA, Brewster SF, Gingell JC (1992) Intravesical foreign bodies: five-year review. Br J Urol 69:41–45
Mosher WD, Pratt WF (1990) Contraceptive use in the United States, 1973–88. Patient Edu Couns 16:163–172
Kassab B, Audra P (1999) The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contracept Fertil Sex 27:696–700
Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D (2003) Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 67:53–56
Hernandez-Valencia M, Carrillo Pacheco A (1998) Intra-vesical translocation of an intrauterine device, report of a case. Ginecol Obstet Mex 66:290–292
Mahmutyazicioglu K, Ozdemir H, Ozkan P (2002) Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the urinary bladder: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 30:496–498
Maskey CP, Rahman M, Sigdar TK, Johnsen R (1997) Vesical calculus around an intra-uterine contraceptive device. Br J Urol 79:654–655
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nouira, Y., Rakrouki, S., Gargouri, M. et al. Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by bladder stone: a report of six cases. Int Urogynecol J 18, 575–578 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0157-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0157-z