Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical activity in women planning sacrocolpopexy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes preoperative physical activity in 314 stress-continent women with prolapse planning sacrocolpopexy. Seventy-six percent reported that they engaged in mild, 60% in moderate, and 26% in strenuous exercise (counts are not mutually exclusive). Activity frequencies did not generally differ by prolapse stage. Prolapse substantially interfered with exercise or recreation in 27% of women, household work or yard work in 19%, and work outside the home in 8%. Compared to women with less symptom distress, more women with greater symptom distress reported that prolapse interfered with household/yard work (43 vs 5%, p<0.0001), working outside the home (29 vs 8%, p<0.005), and recreation/exercise (51 vs 10%, p<0.0001). Prolapse stage was not associated with interference with household/yard work (p=0.28) or work outside home (p=0.89). Although prolapse stage is associated with interference with recreation (p=0.02), this association is not consistently positive : stage II, 42%; stage III, 22%; and stage IV, 32%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health, 2nd edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (November)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nygaard I, DeLancey JOL, Arnsdorf L, Murphy E (1990) Exercise and incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 75:848–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samuelsson EC, Victor FTA, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20–59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter H, Visco A, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber A (2003) A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods. Control Clin Trials 24:629–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco A, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM, for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2006) The CARE Trial: addition of burch colposuspension to abdominal sacrocolpopexy to prevent postoperative urinary stress incontinence. NEJM (in press)

  8. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla M, Pieper CF, Bump RC (2001) Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1388–1395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B (1998) Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol 51:903–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L (1968) Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriat Soc 16:622–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Godin G, Shepherd RJ (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 10:141–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD (2002) Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01 HD41249, U10 HD41268, U10 HD41248, U10 HD41250, U10 HD41261, U10 HD41263, U10 HD41269, and U10 HD41267).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Nygaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network., Nygaard, I., Handa, V. et al. Physical activity in women planning sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 18, 33–37 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0116-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0116-8

Keywords

Navigation