Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 566–569 | Cite as

TVT vs Monarc: a comparative study

  • Hans Peter Dietz
  • Christopher Barry
  • Yik Lim
  • Ajay Rane
Original Article

Abstract

Following the success of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), there has been considerable interest in technique modifications such as the transobturator approach for implant placement. We attempted to elucidate possible anatomical and clinical differences between the two methods in a retrospective cohort study. One hundred and fourteen women who had undergone TVT or Monarc implantation were assessed by or under the supervision of the senior author, with identical tensioning technique. They were followed up by an interview, uroflowmetry, and translabial 3D ultrasound. There were significant differences for patient satisfaction (P=0.013), subjective overall cure/improvement (P=0.0018), and the symptom of poor stream (P=0.03), all favoring the Monarc group. On imaging Monarc tapes appeared more proximal at rest (P=0.006) and Valsalva (P=0.002) and remained further from the symphysis pubis on Valsalva (P=0.01). At 9 months follow-up, there was no significant difference as regards to cure rates for stress incontinence between the two suburethral slings. Monarc tapes are located more proximally and may be less obstructive, judging from a lower incidence of symptoms of voiding dysfunction. Patient satisfaction and overall subjective cure/improvement were higher after Monarc. In summary, the Monarc is an effective TVT alternative, achieving cure of stress incontinence by similar means. It may be less obstructive, resulting in improved patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Monarc Translabial ultrasound Stress incontinence Suburethral slings Tension-free vaginal tape 

References

  1. 1.
    Nilsson C, Falconer C, Rezapour M (2004) Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104(6):1259–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward K, Hilton P (2002). Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. Br Med J 325(7355):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz HP, Foote AJ, Mak HL, Wilson PD (2004) TVT and Sparc suburethral slings: a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J 15(2):129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim YN, Muller R, Corstiaans A, Dietz HP, Barry C, Rane A (2005) Suburethral slingplasty evaluation study in North Queensland, Australia: The suspend trial. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 45(1):52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glavind K, Sander P (2004) Erosion, defective healing and extrusion after tension-free urethropexy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 15(3):179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V (2004) Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 45(2):203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1):80–92 (Review, 86 refs)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD (2003) Does the tension-free vaginal tape stay where you put it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(4):950–953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz H, Barry C, Lim Y, Rane A (2005) Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of suburethral slings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:175–179Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG (2003) Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials. Int Urogynecol J 14(4):239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietz HP, Wilson PD, Gillies K, Vancaillie TG (2000) How does the TVT achieve continence? Neurourol Urodyn 19(4):393–394Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dietz HP, Wilson PD (2004) The ‘iris effect’: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand antiincontinence procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(3):267–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Urogynecology Journal 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Peter Dietz
    • 1
  • Christopher Barry
    • 2
  • Yik Lim
    • 3
  • Ajay Rane
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Clinical School, Nepean CampusUniversity of Sydney, Nepean HospitalSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyTownsville HospitalTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations