Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the rate of anal sphincter lacerations in a large population-based database and analyze risk factors associated with this condition. Data were obtained from Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Council (PHC4) regarding all cases of obstetrical third and fourth degree perineal lacerations that occurred during a 2-year period from January 1990 to December 1991. Modifiable risk factors associated with this condition were analyzed, specifically episiotomy, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, forceps with episiotomy, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, and vacuum with episiotomy. There were a total of 168,337 deliveries in 1990 and 165,051 deliveries in 1991 in Pennsylvania. Twenty-two percent (n=74,881) of the deliveries were by cesarean section and were excluded from analysis. Among the remaining 258,507 deliveries, there were 18,888 (7.3%) third and fourth degree lacerations. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly with use of episiotomy, increased the risk of laceration significantly [forceps odds ratio (OR): 3.84, forceps with episiotomy OR: 3.89, vacuum OR: 2.58, vacuum with episiotomy OR: 2.93]. Episiotomy on the whole was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of sphincter tears. However, episiotomy in the absence of instrumental delivery seems to be protective with an OR of 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88–0.93]. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly forceps delivery, appears to be an important risk factor for anal sphincter tears. The risk previously attributed to episiotomy is probably due to its association with instrumental vaginal delivery. Forceps delivery is associated with higher occurrence of anal sphincter injury compared to vacuum delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS); URL: http://hcup.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.asp

  2. Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Ling L, Ohrlander S (1987) Anal sphincter function after delivery rupture. Obstet Gynecol 70:53–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery—a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM (2001) Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 98:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC (1990) Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 75:765–770

    Google Scholar 

  7. Curtin SC, Martin JA (2000) Births: preliminary data for 1999. Natl Vital Stat Rep 48:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P (2000) Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 95:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temple University Hospital, Seventh floor, Out Patient Building, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Vani Dandolu, Ashwin Chatwani & Ozgur Harmanli

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temple University Hospital, Seventh floor, Out Patient Building, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Clara Floro

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Temple University, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    John P. Gaughan

  4. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temple University Hospital, Seventh floor, Out Patient Building, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Enrique Hernandez

Authors
  1. Vani Dandolu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashwin Chatwani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ozgur Harmanli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clara Floro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John P. Gaughan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enrique Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vani Dandolu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dandolu, V., Chatwani, A., Harmanli, O. et al. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Int Urogynecol J 16, 304–307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1297-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation