Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Routine symptom screening for postnatal urinary and anal incontinence in new mothers from a district

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parous middle-aged women present with urinary and faecal incontinence and childbirth trauma is thought to be a causal factor. Both symptoms are common after childbirth but usually go under-reported. It has been suggested that new mothers are likely to benefit from routine symptom screening because by actively identifying symptomatic women they could then be helped to access continence services. The main objective of this study was to pilot a programme of routine symptom screening for postnatal urinary and anal incontinence in new mothers from a district general hospital. Self-completion questionnaires for both urinary and anal incontinence were sent by post to 442 primiparous women who had delivered consecutively 10 months previously in a district general hospital. Two hundred and seventy-five new mothers responded to the survey. Ninety-two women had new symptoms of incontinence at 10 months, 82 had urinary incontinence and 25 had anal incontinence. However, only six new mothers had discussed the problem with a health professional. Although nine women requested a hospital appointment none of the women attended the appointment arranged for them. The domain scores on both questionnaires were significantly less for symptomatic new mothers when compared to women with established symptoms of incontinence. The programme of screening successfully identified women with symptoms of incontinence. However, all of the symptomatic women declined a follow-up appointment at hospital which questions the benefits of routine screening 10 months after childbirth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacArthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG (1991) Health after childbirth. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:154–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MacArthur C, Lewis M, Bick D (1993) Stress incontinence after childbirth. Br J Midwifery 1:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MRB (1997) Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:46–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaliha C, Kalia V, Monga A, Sultan AH, Stanton SL (1999) Antenatal prediction of incontinence: is it possible? Obstet Gynecol 94:689–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Glazener CM, Herbison GP, Wilson PD, MacArthur C, Lang GD, Gee H, Grant AM (2001) Conservative management of persistent postnatal urinary and faecal incontinence: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 323:593–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiarelli P, Cockburn J (2002) Promoting urinary continence in women after delivery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 324:1241–1244

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brubaker L (2002) Postpartum urinary incontinence. The problem is clear, but there is no simple solution. BMJ 324:1227–1228

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M (1985) Perineal damage in genuine stress incontinence. An electrophysiological study. Br J Urol 57:422–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelleher CJ (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bugg GJ, Kiff ES, Hosker G (2001) A new condition specific health status questionnaire to assess women with anal incontinence after childbirth. BJOG 108:1057–1076

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avis NE, Smith KW (1994) Conceptual and methodological issues in selecting and developing quality of life measures. In: Fitzpatrick R (ed) Quality of life in health care. JAI Press, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306:1437–1440

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bugg G (1999) Two-year follow up of women randomised to medical management or transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1230–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA (1982) Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1:1349–1351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall K, Walsh DM, Baxter D (1997) Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to Janet Shilton who helped with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. Bugg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bugg, G.J., Hosker, G.L. & Kiff, E.S. Routine symptom screening for postnatal urinary and anal incontinence in new mothers from a district. Int Urogynecol J 16, 405–408 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1279-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1279-9

Keywords

Navigation