Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Smooth muscle fraction of the round ligament in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a computer-based morphometric analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to compare the collagen and muscle content of the round ligament of uteri in women with pelvic organ prolapse. We evaluated the tissue samples obtained from the round ligaments of 22 patients with uterine prolapse who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (group A, study) and from 26 patients with no pelvic relaxation in whom total abdominal hysterectomy was performed for benign reasons (group B, controls). Morphometric analysis was performed on histologic cross-sections of the round ligament. Sections from each sample were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome methods. A computer system was used for morphometric measurements. We used independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test to investigate the difference between the two groups. It was found that the smooth muscle fraction of the round ligament in women with uterine prolapse was significantly decreased compared with that of healthy control subjects and concluded that decreased smooth muscle content may be an important pathogenetic factor in uterine prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2 a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tarnay CM, Dorr CH (2003) Relaxation of pelvic supports. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L (eds) Current obstetric and gynecologic diagnosis and treatment. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 789–792

  2. DeLancey JOL (1993) Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:897–909

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norton PA (1993) Pelvic floor disorders: the role of fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:926–938

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luber KM, Boero S, Chae JY (2001) The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:496–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baden WF, Walker TA, Lindsay JH (1968) The vaginal profile. Tex Med J 64:56–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strohbehn K, Jakary JA, Delancey J (1997) Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Obstet Gynecol 90:33–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith ARB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW (1989) The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the etiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:24–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:770–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swift SE, Pound T, Dias JK (2001) Case-control study of etiologic factors in the development of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 12:187–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Makinen J, Soderstrom K, Kiilholma P, Hirvonen T (1986) Histological changes in the vaginal connective tissue of patients with and without uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol 239:17–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Kholi GY, Mina SN (1975) Elastic tissue of the vagina in genital prolapse. A morphological study. J Egypt Med Assoc 58:196–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kökçü A, Yanık F, Çetinkaya M, Alper T, Kandemir B, Malatyalıoğlu E (2002) Histopathological evaluation of the connective tissue of the vaginal fascia and the uterine ligaments in women with and without pelvic relaxation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoot VD (1996) Human (and some other primates’) uterine teres ligament represents a mammalian developmental novelty. Anat Rec 244:402–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric properties of the posterior vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1501–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Samuelsson EC, Victor FTA, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bump RC (1993) Racial comparisons and contrasts in urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 81:421–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garrett W, Nikolaou P, Ribbeck B, Glisson R, Seaber A (1988) The effects of muscle architecture on the biomechanical failure properties of skeletal muscle under passive extension. Am J Sports Med 16:7–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barlow DH, Cardozo LD, Francis RM, Griffin M, Hart DM, Stephens E, et al. (1997) Urogenital aging and its effect on sexual health in older British women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:87–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith P, Heimer G, Norgren A, Ulmsten U (1990) Steroid hormone receptors in pelvic muscles and ligaments in women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 30:27–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Visco AG, Yuan L (2003) Differential gene expression in pubococcygeus muscle from patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:102–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Special thanks go to Yavuz Sanislioglu for his excellent contribution to the statistical analysis, Levent Seckin, MD and Akın Sivaslioglu, MD for their valuable efforts in tissue acquisition and to the Pathology Department of Gulhane Military Medical Academy and Medical Faculty for their hard work and precious efforts. We are also grateful to Omer Sarlak, MD for his support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozlem Ozdegirmenci.

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This paper adds to a body of information showing that smooth muscle content of pelvic floor supporting tissues is reduced in women with pelvic organ prolapse. The morphometric computer analysis seems to be a good technique for determining the percentage of tissue that is comprised of smooth muscle and the percentage of tissue that is comprised of connective tissue. This paper is an extension of work published by Boreham et al., who also assessed smooth muscle in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Additional work remains to be done to determine if loss of smooth muscle volume is a cause or effect of prolapse. It is also clear that smooth muscle content is a reflection of age and menopausal status

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozdegirmenci, O., Karslioglu, Y., Dede, S. et al. Smooth muscle fraction of the round ligament in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a computer-based morphometric analysis. Int Urogynecol J 16, 39–43 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1215-z

Keywords

Navigation