Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is the Clinical Relevance of a Paravaginal Defect?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Stanton SL, Helton P, Norton L, et al (1982) Clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse with and without incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol 89:459–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Porges RF, Smilen SW (1994) Long term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1518–1528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly HA, Dumm WM (1914) Urinary incontinence in women without manifest injury to the bladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet 18:444–450

    Google Scholar 

  4. White GR (1909) Cystocele. JAMA 21:1707–1710

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NE (1976) A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:568–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mickey M. Karram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karram, M.M. What is the Clinical Relevance of a Paravaginal Defect?. Int Urogynecol J 15, 1–2 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1120-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1120-5

Navigation