The aim of this study was to determine the effects of improvements in urinary incontinence resulting from pelvic floor rehabilitation on the sexual function of patients. The study involved 42 clinic patients who received pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment. Their sexual histories were obtained through face-to-face interviews. Pelvic muscle strength was measured with a perineometer. Improvement in incontinence was measured with the pad test. Seventeen women reported decreased sexual desire before the treatment; 5 of these indicated improvement after treatment. Nine of 17 women who experienced dyspareunia prior to treatment reported an improvement afterwards, and four women reported complete relief from pain. Five of 15 women who complained of difficulty in reaching climax before the treatment experienced improvement in this area. In conclusion, an improvement in sexual desire, performance during coitus and achievement of orgasm were observed in women who received pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation. No change was seen in the arousal and resolution stages of sexual activity.
Pelvic floor rehabilitation Sexual function Urinary incontinence
Functional electrical stimulation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Istanbul. Project number: B-572/17072000.
Dolman M (1997) Continence issues. In: Andrews G, ed. Women's sexual health. London, Baillière Tindall, 365–389Google Scholar
Gordon D, Groutz A, Sinai T et al. (1999) Sexual function in women attending a urogynecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J 10:325–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller LA, Lose G (2000) Sexuality and urinary incontinence: Cause or effect? Int Urogynecol J 11:58Google Scholar
Mouritsen L (1997) Sex and urogynecological problems − a survey. Nordisk Sexologi 15:89–98Google Scholar
Temml C, Haidinger G, Schmidbauer J et al. (2000) Urinary incontinence in both sexes: Prevalence rates and impact on quality of life and sexual life. Neurol Urodyn 19:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR et al. (1995) Sexual function in women with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85:483–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Winder A (1995) Sexuality and incontinence, professional issues. London, Association for Continence AdviceGoogle Scholar
Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J et al. (1996) Urinary incontinence in adults: Acute and chronic management. Rockville MD, US Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
Hahn I, Milsom I, Fall M et al. (1993) Long-term results of pelvic floor training in female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Urol 72:421–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
Meyer S, Dhenin T, Schmidt N et al. (1992) Subjective and objective effects of intravaginal electrical myostimulation and biofeedback in patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Br J Urol 69:584–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sampselle CM, Dougherty MC, Newman DK et al. (1997) Continence for women: evidence-based practice. JOGNN 26:375–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bo K, Talselth T, Vinsnes J (2000) Randomized controlled trial on the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on quality of life and sexual problems in genuine stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:598–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Laycock J, Green PJ (1988) Interferential therapy in the treatment of incontinence. Physiotherapy 74:161–168Google Scholar
Brink CA, Wells TJ, Sampselle CM et al. (1994) A digital test for pelvic muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Res 43:352PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jabs C, Baessler K, Stanton SL (2000) Coital Incontinence among urogynecological patients. International Continence Society Annual Meeting 177Google Scholar
Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, Mitchinson A. (1995)Vaginal anatomy and sexual function. Obstet Gynecol 86:946–949PubMedGoogle Scholar