Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials
- 519 Downloads
Synthetic suburethral slings have recently become popular despite the risk of erosion commonly associated with synthetic implants. Some of these materials seem to have unexpectedly low erosion rates. Based on the hypothesis that erosion is due, in part, to biomechanical properties, we undertook an in vitro study. The biomechanical properties of eight non-resorbable synthetic implant materials, stiffness (slope, N/mm) and peak load (N) were determined from load vs. displacement curves. Open-weave Prolene mesh showed unique biomechanical properties compared to other tested materials. The tension- free vaginal tape had the lowest initial stiffness (0.23 N/mm), i.e. low resistance to deformation at forces below the elastic limit, whereas the stiffest implant tested, a nylon tape, reached 6.83 N/mm. We concluded that the TVT and other wide-weave Prolene tapes have unique biomechanical characteristics. These properties may be at least partly responsible for the apparent clinical success of the implants.
KeywordsBiomechanics Implant materials Incontinence surgery Prolene mesh Stiffness TVT
Materials were supplied free of charge. There was no further corporate sponsorship of this study by any manufacturer.
- 1.Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1997) The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J 8:105–115Google Scholar
- 7.Stanton S (2001) Some reflections on tension-free vaginal tape – a new surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 12 [Suppl 2]:S1–2Google Scholar
- 8.Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD (2003) How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (in press)Google Scholar
- 9.Falconer C, Soederberg M, Blomgren B, Ulmsten U (2001) Influence of different sling materials on connective tissue metabolism in stress urinary incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 12 [Suppl 2]:S19–23Google Scholar