Abstract
Despite recent calls for processual analysis of routines creation, little work has been done to investigate the entrepreneurial mechanisms that explain the creation and adoption of new routines. This paper provides a processual contribution to the study of organizational routines by proposing a model for routine creation, based on an analysis of collective entrepreneurial actions. Using an entrepreneurial bricolage lens, we show how agents, during the creation of new routines, develop mechanisms to adapt firm processes, enact external constraints and validate novel practices. Our analysis is based on a three-year collaborative study in a French biotechnology firm. We develop a processual model of routine creation comprising three phases: scanning, performing and adopting. The model provides new insights into the interplay between artefacts and entrepreneurial actions in the creation of new routines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Technological paradigms are the scientific principles and technology that apply to a given industry; they are“… as a ‘pattern’ of solution of selected techno economic problems based on highly selected principles derived from that natural sciences, jointly with specific rules aimed to acquire new knowledge and safeguard it […] A technological paradigm is both an exemplar – an artifact that is to be developed and improved …and a set of heuristics” (Dosi 1988: 1127), and show how these ‘heuristics’ are embodied in organizational routines.
Registration refers to the process involved in firms obtaining regulatory approvals to sell their products.
The term ‘dossier’ is used by the regulatory authorities and by practitioners to describe the documents that firms submit to obtain product or substance approval.
References
Aldrich HE, Martinez MA (2001) Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 25:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500404
Aldrich HE, Yang T (2014) How do entrepreneurs know what to do? Learning and organizing in new ventures. J Evol Econ 24:59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-013-0320-x
Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q 50:329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Bapuji H, Hora M, Saeed AM (2012) Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: examining the emergence of routines. J Manag Stud 49:1586–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01063.x
Becker MC, Knudsen T, March JG (2006) Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Ind Corp Change 15:353–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl003
Bertels S, Howard-Grenville J, Pek S (2016) Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: the role of culture in the integration of routines. Organ Sci 27:573–593. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1052
Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ Sci 27:594–613. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1041
Busenitz LW, West GP, Shepherd D et al (2003) Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. J Manag 29:285–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00013-8
Cacciatori E (2012) Resolving conflict in problem-solving: systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. J Manag Stud 49:1559–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01065.x
Casson M (1982) The entrepreneur: an economic theory. Rowman & Littlefield
Chandler D, Bailey AS, Tatchell GM et al (2011) The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 366:1987–1998. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0390
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage
Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine. Organ Stud 28:773–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606077620
Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ Sci 5:554–568
Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G et al (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Ind Corp Change 5:653–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/5.3.653
Comeche JM, Loras J (2010) The influence of variables of attitude on collective entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 6:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0131-6
Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall
D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the Centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory. J Institutional Econ 7:197–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741000024X
D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res Policy 37:769–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012
D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations enact multiple goals in routine tansfer. Organ Sci 25:1325–1350. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0913
Davies A, Frederiksen L, Cacciatori E, Hartmann A (2018) The long and winding road: routine creation and replication in multi-site organizations. Res Policy 47:1403–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.016
Desa G (2012) Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrep Theory Pract 36:727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x
Di Domenico M, Haugh H, Tracey P (2010) Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrep Theory Pract 34:681–703
Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad Manag Rev 38:181–205. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0215
Dittrich K, Guérard S, Seidl D (2016) Talking about routines: the role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ Sci 27:678–697. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1024
Dittrich K, Seidl D (2017) Emerging intentionality in routine dynamics: a pragmatist view. Acad Manag J 61:111–138. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0010
Duymedjian R, Rüling C-C (2010) Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organ Stud 31:133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 46:685. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094828
Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Am J Sociol 103:962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Feldman MS (2016) Routines as process: past, present, and future. In: Howard-Grenville J, Rerup C, Langley A, Tsoukas H (eds) Organizational routines: how they are created, maintained, and changed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p 267
Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ Sci 11:611–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529
Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm Sci Q 48:94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ Sci 27:505–513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1070
Felin T, Foss NJ (2009) Organizational routines and capabilities: historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scand J Manag 25:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2009.02.003
Garud R, Karnøe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy 32:277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
Glaser VL (2017) Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Acad Manag J 60:2126–2154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0842
Greve HR (2008) Organizational routines and performance feedback. In: Becker MC (ed) Handbook of organizational routines. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Northampton, pp 187–204
Gupta A, Hoopes DG, Knott AM (2015) Redesigning routines for replication. Strateg Manag J 36:851–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2254
Halme M, Lindeman S, Linna P (2012) Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. J Manag Stud 49:743–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01045.x
Handford CE, Elliott CT, Campbell K (2015) A review of the global pesticide legislation and the scale of challenge in reaching the global harmonization of food safety standards. Integr Environ Assess Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1635
Hilliard R, Goldstein D (2019) Identifying and measuring dynamic capability using search routines. Strategic Organization, 17(2), 210–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018755001
Howard-Grenville JA (2005) The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organ Sci 16:618–636. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0150
Howard-Grenville JA, Rerup C, Langley A, Tsoukas H (2016) Organizational routines: how they are created, maintained, and changed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Janssen F, Fayolle A, Wuilaume A (2018) Researching bricolage in social entrepreneurship. Entrep Reg Dev 30:450–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1413769
Jarzabkowski P, Bednarek R, Spee P (2016) The role of artifacts in stablishing connectivity within professional routines: a question of entanglement. In: Howard-Grenville J, Rerup C, Langley a, Tsoukas H (eds) organizational routines: how they are areated, maintained, and changed. Oxford University Press, p 240
Kay NM (2018) We need to talk: opposing narratives and conflicting perspectives in the conversation on routines. Ind Corp Change 27:943–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty025
Labatut J, Aggeri F, Girard N (2012) Discipline and change: how technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation. Organ Stud 33:39–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611430589
Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag R 24(4):691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
Lazaric N, Denis B (2005) Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: the case of the introduction of ISO norms. Ind Corp Change 14:873–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth074
Lazaric N, Mangolte P-A, Massué M-L (2003) Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: evidence from blast furnace control in France. Res Policy 32:1829–1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00066-0
Levi-Strauss C (1966) The savage mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Linna P (2013) Bricolage as a means of innovating in a resource-scarce environment: a study of innovator-entrepreneurs at the BOP. J Dev Entrep 18:1350015. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946713500155
Lorino P (2018) Pragmatism and organization studies, Oxford University Press
Low MB, MacMillan IC (1988) Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. J Manag 14:139–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400202
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations, Wiley. New York, NY
Mathews JA (2010) Lachmannian insights into strategic entrepreneurship: resources, activities and routines in a disequilibrium world. Organ Stud 31:219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347044
Maxwell JA, Miller BA (2008) Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (eds) Handbook of emergent methods. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 461–477
McMullen JS, Shepherd DA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Acad Manag Rev 31:132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379628
Miller KD, Pentland BT, Choi S (2012) Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines: performing and remembering organizational toutines. J Manag Stud 49:1536–1558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01062.x
Minniti M, Bygrave W (2001) A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrep Theory Pract 25:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500301
Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Obstfeld D (2012) Creative projects: a less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ Sci 23(6):1571–1592
Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ Stud 28:1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3:398–427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Parker SC (2011) Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? J Bus Ventur 26:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.003
Parmentier-Cajaiba A (2010) “La construction de compétences fondamentales, une application à l’homologation dans l’industrie du biocontrôle”. PhD dissertation, Université de Grenoble
Parmentier-Cajaiba A, Cajaiba-Santana G (2020) “Visual Maps for Process Research: Displaying the Invisible”, M@n@gement
Parmentier-Cajaiba A (2018) Le Dialogue Comme Vecteur d’Actions et de Connaissances Orientées Stratégie. In: Stratégie Organisationnelle par le Dialogue, Economica. Paris, pp 124–134
Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad Manag Ann 5:413–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.589143
Pentland BT (1995) Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ Sci 6(5):541–556
Pentland BT (2011) The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: comment on Felin and Foss. J Institutional Econ 7:279–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741000041X
Pentland BT, Feldman MS, Becker MC, Liu P (2012) Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. J Manag Stud 49:1484–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x
Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Adm Sci Q:484–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393300
Phillips DJ (2005) Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: the case of Silicon Valley law firms. Adm Sci Q 50:440–472. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.440
Possas ML, Salles-Filho S, da Silveira JM (1996) An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: some preliminary remarks. Res Policy 25:933–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(96)00884-0
Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad Manag J 54:577–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968107
Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ Sci 20:384–409. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0408
Salvato C, Rerup C (2011) Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J Manag 37:468–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310371691
Senyard J, Baker T, Davidsson P (2009) Entrepreneurial bricolage: towards systematic empirical testing. Front Entrep Res 29:5
Shani AB, Mohrman SA, Pasmore WA, et al (2007) Handbook of collaborative management research. Sage
Sharma P, Chrisman SJJ (1999) Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 23:11–27
Simpson B, Lorino P (2016) Re-viewing routines through a pragmatist lens. In: Howard-Grenville JA, Rerup C, Langley A, Tsoukas H (eds) Organizational routines: how they are created, maintained, and changed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strateg Manag J 11:17–27
Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) handbook of organizations. : Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–169
Tell F (2013) Knowledge articulation. Palgrave Encycl Strateg Manag 1–5
Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ Sci 13:567–582
Turner SF, Rindova V (2012) A balancing act: how organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organ Sci 23:24–46. Doi: 0.1287/orsc.1110.0653
Vanevenhoven J, Winkel D, Malewicki D et al (2011) Varieties of bricolage and the process of entrepreneurship. N Engl J Entrep 14:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-14-02-2011-B005
Vanloqueren G, Baret PV (2009) How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Res Policy 38:971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
Winter S, Teece DJ (1998) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In: Klein DA (ed) The strategic management of intellectual capital. Routledge, Woburn
Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24:991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ Sci 12:730–743. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084
Witell L, Gebauer H, Jaakkola E et al (2017) A bricolage perspective on service innovation. J Bus Res 79:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.021
Zahra SA (1993) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: a critique and extension. Entrep Theory Pract 17:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ Sci 21:955–972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0513
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper provides a processual contribution to the study of organizational routines by proposing a model for routine creation, based on an analysis of collective entrepreneurial actions. Using an entrepreneurial bricolage lens, we show how agents, during the creation of new routines, develop mechanisms to adapt firm processes, enact external constraints and validate novel practices. Our analysis is based on a three-year collaborative study in a French biotechnology firm. We develop a processual model of routine creation comprising three phases: scanning, performing and adopting.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parmentier-Cajaiba, A., Lazaric, N. & Cajaiba-Santana, G. The effortful process of routines emergence: the interplay of entrepreneurial actions and artefacts. J Evol Econ 31, 33–63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00691-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00691-7