Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of bank bailout policy: two centuries of variation, selection and retention

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why has the policy of state-backed bank bailouts emerged as the de facto global response by governments to crises involving systemic bank risk? This question has salience in the context that while bank bailouts solve an immediate problem of systemic risk, they create another set of problems almost as significant. Bailouts involve largescale socialization of private losses, are politically toxic, ideologically contrary to market norms, and economically costly to the state. For these reasons many commentators view the policy to be neither optimal nor desirable, yet it has nonetheless been institutionalized in all modern financial systems. In this paper I argue that the global diffusion of bank bailout policy over the past two centuries is an example of institutional evolution. A process of variation, selection and retention has winnowed down initial variation in responses to possible financial sector collapse to one policy, a state-backed guarantee to bail out the financial system. Understanding the past is a prerequisite for gaining insight into possible futures. Consequently, historical study of bank bailouts will contribute to understanding the future evolution of systemic banking crises by providing insight into the evolution of institutional resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thorstein Veblen’s work at the turn of the twentieth century foreshadowed modern VSR theory.

  2. By ‘natural’ I only wish to emphasize that these are factors that are not the result of human agency.

References

  • Acharya V, Beck T, Evanoff DD, Kaufman G, Portes R (eds) (2014) The Social Value of the Financial Sector, vol 29. Sorld Scientific, New Jersey Too big to fail or just too big?

  • Aldrich HE, Hodgson GM, Hull DL, Knudsen T, Mokyr J, Vanberg VJ (2008) In defence of generalized Darwinism. J Evol Econ 18(5):577–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich Howard E, Ruef M (2006) Organizations evolving, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliber RZ, Kindleberger CP (2015) Manias, 7th edn. Palgrave MacMillan, London P A History of Financial Crises

  • Bagehot W (1874) Lombard Street, ou le marché financier en Angleterre. Germer Baillière, Paris

  • Bagehot W (1873) Lombard Street: A description of the money market. Henry S. King and Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D., & McArthur, T. 2009. The Value of the “Too Big to Fail” Big Bank Subsidy. Center for Economic and Policy Research, September.

  • Beinhocker ED (2011) Evolution as computation: integrating self-organization with generalized Darwinism. Journal of Institutional Economics 7(3):393–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin D (2010) Generalising Darwinism to study socio-cultural change. International Journal of Sociology Social Policy 30(7/8):427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C (2013) Transmutability, generalised Darwinism and the limits to conceptual integration. Camb J Econ 37(1):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buskes C (2013) Darwinism extended: A survey of how the idea of cultural evolution evolved. Philosophia 41(3):661–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1965) Variation, Selection and Retention in Sociocultural Evolution. In: Barringer H, Blanksten G, Mack R (eds) Social Change in Developing Areas. Schenkman, A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory: 19–49. Cambridge

  • Caprio, G. J., & Vittas, D. 1997. Financial history: Lessons of the past for reformers of the present. In G. J. Caprio, & D. Vittas (Eds.), Reforming financial systems: Historical implications for policy: 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Clarke J, Newman J (2012) The alchemy of austerity. Critical social policy 32(3):299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1924) Legal Foundations of Capitalism. The Macmillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen DJ (2000a) The First Bank of the United States and the securities market crash of 1792. J Econ Hist 60(4):1041–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen DJ (2000b) The Origins and Economic Impact of the First Bank of the United States. Garland, 1791–1797. New York

  • Davison L (1997) Continental Illinois and ‘Too Big to Fail’, vol 1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, pp 235–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1999) The extended phenotype, 2 edn. Oxford University Press, New York the long reach of the gene, revised edition

  • Eichengreen B (1992) Golden Fetters. Oxford University Press, The Gold Standard and the Great Depression. New York

  • Feld MD (1975) Middle-Class Society and the Rise of Military Professionalism: The Dutch Army 1589–1609. Armed Forces Society 1(4):419–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J, Metcalfe JS (2012) Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective. J Econ Behav Organ 82(2–3):420–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. J. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gitlin T (2013) Occupy’s predicament: the moment and the prospects for the movement. Br J Sociol 64(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjedrem S (2009) The financial crisis – the path ahead, Annual Meeting of the Norwegian Savings Banks Association: Norges Bank

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2000) The replicator in retrospect. Biol Philos 15(3):403–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart CA (1999) Myths about the lender of last resort. Int Finance 2(3):339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G, Tallman EW (2016) Too Big to Fail Before the Fed. Am Econ Rev 106(5):528–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. S. 2010. Unsettled account: The evolution of banking in the industrialized world since 1800. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  • Grubel HG (1971) Risk, uncertainty and moral hazard. Journal of Risk and Insurance: 99–106

  • Grytten OH, Hunnes A (2010) A chronology of financial crises for Norway. Norwegian Scool of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series(13): 1–34

  • Gup BE (ed) (2004a) Too big to fail. Praeger, policies and practices in government bailouts. Westport

  • Gup, B. E. 2004b. What Does Too Big to Fail Mean? In B. E. Gup (Ed.), Too Big to Fail: Policies and Practices in Government Bailouts: 29–48. Westport, CT: Praeger.

  • Hodgson GM (2002) Darwinism in economics: from analogy to ontology. Journal of evolutionary economics 12(3):259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2004a) Darwinism, causality and the social sciences. J Econ Methodol 11(2):175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2004a) The complex evolution of a simple traffic convention: the functions and implications of habit. J Econ Behav Organ 54(1):19–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2004b) The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of evolutionary economics 14(3):281–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2004b) The Evolution of Institutional Economics. Routledge, Agency, Structure and Darwinianism in American Institutionalism. London

  • Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2010) The Darwin Conjecture. The University of Chicago Press, The search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago

  • Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2012) Agreeing on generalised Darwinism: a response to Pavel Pelikan. J Evol Econ 22(1):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2015) Conceptualizing Capitalism. University of Chicago Press, Institutions, Evolution, Future. Chicago

  • Hull DL (1988) Science as a process. University of Chicago Press, an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago

  • Kaufman G (1990) Are some banks too large to fail? Myth and reality. Contemp Econ Policy 8(4):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeven L, Valencia F (2012) Systemic banking crises database: An update. IMF Working Paper, 12(163): 1–33

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Feldman MW (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and brain sciences 23(1):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annual review of ecology and systematics 1(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren C-J, Garcia G, Saal MI (1996) Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 2012. The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 (2 ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • McDonagh N (2019) Tales of Austerity, and a Crisis of Wealth Distribution. In: Power K, Lebduskova E, Ali T (eds) Discourse Analysis and Austerity. Routledge, Critical Studies from Economics and Linguistics. New York

  • McKinley V (2011) Financing failure. Independent Institute, a century of bailouts. Oakland

  • Metcalfe JS (1998) Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin F (2006) How Big a Problem Is Too Big to Fail? A Review of Gary Stern and Ron Feldman’s” Too Big to Fail: The Hazards of Bank Bailouts”. Journal of Economic Literature: 988–1004

  • Mitchell WC (1941) Business Cycles and their Causes. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa I (2010) The myth of too big to fail. Journal of Banking Regulation, 11(4)

  • Morgan DP, Stiroh KJ (2005) Too big to fail after all these years. Staff Report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, No. 220

  • Mullineux AW (1990) Business cycles and financial crises. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Bellknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (2007) Universal Darwinism and evolutionary social science. Biology Philosophy 22(1):73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen J (2015) Should banks be bailed out?, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Central Bank Speech. Bank of International Settlements, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara M, Shaw W (1990) Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being “too big to fail”. The Journal of Finance 45(5):1587–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CM, Rogoff K (2009) This Time is Different. Princeton University Press, Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2006) Not by genes alone. University of Chicago Press, How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago

  • Roberts A (2012) Why the Occupy movement failed. Public Adm Rev 5(72):754–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Settlements BFI (2018) About BIS

  • Sherman H (1991) The Business Cycle. Princeton University Press, Growth and Crisis Under Capitalism. Princeton

  • Sprague IH (1986) Bailout. Basic Books, An Insider’s Account of Bank Failures and Rescues. New York

  • Stern GH, Feldman RJ (2004) Too big to fail. Brookings Institution Press, The hazards of bank bailouts. Washington, D.C.

  • Swary I (1986) Stock market reaction to regulatory action in the Continental Illinois crisis. Journal of Business: 451–473

  • Sylla R, Wright RE, Cowen DJ (2009) Alexander Hamilton, central banker: crisis management during the US financial panic of 1792. Bus Hist Rev 83(1):61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2006) War and Peace and War. Pi Press, The life cycles of imperial nations. New York

  • Veblen T (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 12(4):373–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T, [1899] (2007) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford University Press, An Economic Study of Institutions. Oxford

  • Westermeier C (2018) The Bank of International Settlements as a think tank for financial policy-making. Policy and Society: 1–18

  • Wilson DS, Van Vugt M, O’Gorman R (2008) Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions: Implications for psychological science. Current directions in psychological science 17(1):6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi A, Kang E, Fraser D, Cannella AA (2018) Managerial Risk-Taking Behavior: A Too-Big-To-Fail Story. J Bus Ethics 149(1):221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks two anonymous reviewers as well as Campbell Jones and Steve Matthewman for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The author also wishes to thank the School of Sociology, University of Auckland for supporting primary research for this article. All errors are attributable to the author alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoise McDonagh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDonagh, N. The evolution of bank bailout policy: two centuries of variation, selection and retention. J Evol Econ 31, 1065–1088 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00666-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00666-8

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation