Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 787–820 | Cite as

An age structured demographic theory of technological change

  • Jean-François MercureEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

At the heart of technology transitions lie complex processes of social and industrial dynamics. The quantitative study of sustainability transitions requires modelling work, which necessitates a theory of technology substitution. Many, if not most, contemporary modelling approaches for future technology pathways overlook most aspects of transitions theory, for instance dimensions of heterogenous investor choices, dynamic rates of diffusion and the profile of transitions. A significant body of literature however exists that demonstrates how transitions follow S-shaped diffusion curves or Lotka-Volterra systems of equations. This framework is used ex-post since timescales can only be reliably obtained in cases where the transitions have already occurred, precluding its use for studying cases of interest where nascent innovations in protective niches await favourable conditions for their diffusion. In principle, scaling parameters of transitions can, however, be derived from knowledge of industrial dynamics, technology turnover rates and technology characteristics. In this context, this paper presents a theory framework for evaluating the parameterisation of S-shaped diffusion curves for use in simulation models of technology transitions without the involvement of historical data fitting, making use of standard demography theory applied to technology at the unit level. The classic Lotka-Volterra competition system emerges from first principles from demography theory, its timescales explained in terms of technology lifetimes and industrial dynamics. The theory is placed in the context of the multi-level perspective on technology transitions, where innovation and the diffusion of new socio-technical regimes take a prominent place, as well as discrete choice theory, the primary theoretical framework for introducing agent diversity.

Keywords

Technology transitions Lotka-Volterra Replicator dynamics Evolutionary economics Discrete choice theory 

JEL Classification

O330 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the students who have been attending the Energy Systems Modelling seminars held at 4CMR in 2013, in particular A. Lam, P. Salas and E. Oughton, with whom the discussions on technology and evolutionary economics led to the development and enhancement of this theory. I would furthermore like to thank participants to the International Conference on Sustainability Transition 2013 for providing valuable feedback, in particular K. Safarzynska for critical comments, as well as two anonymous referees for their recommendations. This research was funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, fellowship number EP/K007254/1.

References

  1. Andersen ES (1994) Evolutionary Economics, Post-Schumpeterian Contributions. Pinter PublishersGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson PW (1972) More is different. Science 177(4047):393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling C, Jansson B, Levin S, Maler K, Perrings C, Pimentel D (1995) Economic-growth, carrying-capacity, and the environment. Science 268(5210):520–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur W B (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkeson A, Kehoe PJ (2007) Modeling the transition to a new economy: Lessons from two technological revolutions. Am Econ Rev 97(1):64–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT pressGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucekkine R, Croix DDL, Licandro O (2004) Modelling vintage structures with DDEs: principles and applications. Math Popul Stud 11(3-4):151–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boucekkine R, De la Croix D, Licandro O (2011) Vintage capital growth theory: Three breakthroughs. UFAE and IAE Working Papers 875.11, Unitat de Fonaments de l’Anlisi Econmica (UAB) and Institut d’Anlisi Econmica (CSIC)Google Scholar
  9. Cambridge Econometrics (2014) Cambridge Econometrics E3ME Manual. http://www.e3me.com
  10. Domencich TA, McFadden D (1975) Urban travel demand - A behavioural analysis. North-Holland PublishingGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas M (1979) The world of goods. Towards an anthropology of consumption. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Farrell CJ (1993) A theory of technological progress. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 44(2):161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher JC, Pry RH (1971) A simple substitution model of technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 3(1):75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8-9):1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geels FW (2005) The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860 - 1930). Technol Anal Strateg Manag 17(4):445–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grübler A (1998) Technology and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grübler A, Nakicenovic N, Victor D (1999) Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27(5):247–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodgson G, Huang K (2012) Evolutionary game theory and evolutionary economics: Are they different species J Evol Econ 22(2):345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IEA/ETSAP (2012) Energy technology systems analysis program. http://www.iea-etsap.org/
  21. Johansen L (1959) Substitution versus fixed production coefficients in the theory of economic growth: A synthesis. Econometrica 27(2):157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keen S (2011) Debunking Economics - Revised and expanded edition. Zed BooksGoogle Scholar
  23. Keyfitz N (1967) The integral equation of population analysis. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute 35(3):213–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keyfitz N (1977) Introduction to the Mathematics of Population. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  25. Kot M (2001) Elements of Mathematical Ecology. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Lakka S, Michalakelis C, Varoutas D, Martakos D (2013) Competitive dynamics in the operating systems market: Modeling and policy implications. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80 (1):88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lotka AJ (1911) A problem in age-distribution. Philos Magazine 21:435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L, Winter S (1999) ‘history-friendly’ models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Indust Corp Chang 8(1):3–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansfield E (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29(4):741–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marchetti C, Nakicenovic N (1978) The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. Technical Report, IIASA, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/TNT/WEB/PUB/RR/rr-79-13.pdf
  31. McDonald A, Schrattenholzer L (2001) Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29(4):255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, Frontiers in EconometricsGoogle Scholar
  33. McShane BB, Bradlow ET, Berger J (2012) Visual influence and social groups. J Mark Res 49(6):854–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercure JF (2012) Ftt:power : A global model of the power sector with induced technological change and natural resource depletion. Energy Policy 48(0):799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mercure JF, Pollitt H, Chewpreecha U, Salas P, Foley A, Holden P, Edwards N (2014) The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector. Energy Policy 73(0):686–700. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Messner S, Strubegger M (1995) User’s guide for MESSAGE III. Technical Report, IIASA, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/WP-95-069.pdf
  37. Metcalfe J (2008) Accounting for economic evolution: Fitness and the population method. J Bioecon 10(1):23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Metcalfe JS (2004) Ed mansfield and the diffusion of innovation: An evolutionary connection. J Technol Trans 30:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakicenovic N (1986) The automobile road to technological-change - Diffusion of the automobile as a process of technological substitution. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 29(4):309–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Nordhaus WD (2010) Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
  42. ORNL (2012) Transportation energy data book, 31st edn. Technical Report, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of innovations. Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
  44. Safarzynska K, Van den Bergh JCJM (2010) Evolutionary models in economics: a survey of methods and building blocks. J Evol Econ 20(3):329–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Safarzynska K, van den Bergh JCJM (2012) An evolutionary model of energy transitions with interactive innovation-selection dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  46. Saviotti P, Mani G (1995) Competition, variety and technological evolution: A replicator dynamics model. J Evol Econ 5(4):369–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development - An inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Schumpeter JA (1939) Business Cycles. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  49. Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Martino Publishing, Eastford, USAGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharif MN, Kabir C (1976) Generalized model for forecasting technological substitution. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 8(4):353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silverberg G (1988) Modelling economic dynamics and technical change: mathematical approaches to self-organisation and evolution. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, pp 560–607Google Scholar
  52. Solow RM, Tobin J, von Weizscker C C, Yaari M (1966) Neoclassical growth with fixed factor proportions. Rev Econ Stud 33(2):79–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. De Vries BJ, van Vuuren DP, Den Elzen MG, Janssen MA (2001) The Targets IMage Energy Regional (TIMER) Model. Technical Report, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)Google Scholar
  54. Weiss M, Patel MK, Junginger M, Perujo A, Bonnel P, Van Grootveld G (2012) On the electrification of road transport - learning rates and price forecasts for hybrid-electric and battery-electric vehicles. Energy Policy 48(0):374–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson C (2009) Meta-analysis of unit and industry level scaling dynamics in energy technologies and climate change mitigation scenarios. Technical Report IR-09-029, IIASA, http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/IR-09-029.pdf
  56. Wilson C (2012) Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies. Energy Policy 50:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land EconomyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations