Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 735–766 | Cite as

Entrepreneurship, structural change, and economic growth

  • Florian Noseleit
Regular Article


The ability to adjust to structural change is vital to economic development, and entries can be active participants in this process. While the importance of factor reallocations for growth is widely discussed, the role of entrepreneurs in managing these reallocations is currently not well understood. This paper analyzes the role of entry activity for adjustments of the sectoral structure and its relevance for regional economic development. The historical framework is the accelerated economic transformation that occurred in industrialized countries during the mid 1970s, resulting in an increasing need to adjust. Based on German data from 1975 to 2002, evidence is presented that sectoral reallocations are an important means for transforming entrepreneurial activity into growth.


Entrepreneurship New business formation Regional development Structural change 

JEL Classification

L26 M13 O1 O18 R11 


  1. Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afuah AN (2000) How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strateg Manag J 21(3):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev Econ Stat 78:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agarwal R, Gort M (2002) Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. Am Econ Rev 92:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahlgren P, Jarneving B, Rousseau R (2003) Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(6):550–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge/MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  8. Balasubramanian N, Lee J (2008) Firm age and innovation. Ind Corp Change 17:1019–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldwin JR, Gu W (2006) Competition, firm turnover and productivity growth. Economic analysis research paper series, 42Google Scholar
  10. Baumol WJ, Blackman SAB, Wolf EN (1989) Productivity and American leadership. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Beesley ME, Hamilton RT (1984) Small Firms’ seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. J Ind Econ 33:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell D (1973) The coming of post-industrial society. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bensman SJ (2004) Pearson’s r and author cocitation analysis: a commentary on the controversy. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 55(10):935–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2010) Multiple-product firms and product switching. Am Econ Rev 100:70–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhidé AV (2000) The origin and evolution of new businesses. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Carree MA, Thurik AR (2003) The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In: Zoltan JA, Audretsch DB (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Kluwer, Boston, pp. 437–471Google Scholar
  17. Cassiman B, Ueda M (2006) Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Manag Sci 52:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper AC, Dunkelberg WC (1987) Entrepreneurial research: old questions, new answers and methodological issues. Am J Small Bus 11:11–23Google Scholar
  19. David PA (1994) Why are institutions the Carriers of history?: path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Struct Change Econ Dyn 5(2):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. David PA (2007) Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics.” In: Hodgson GM (ed) The evolution of economic institutions: a critical reader. Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
  21. Disney R, Hasekl J, Helden Y (2003) Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113:666–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Echevarria EC (1997) Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. Int Econ Rev 38(2):431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fagerberg JE (2003) Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature. J Evol Econ 13(2):125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faulstich W (2004) Gesellschaft und Kultur der siebziger Jahre: Einführung und Überblick. In: Faulstich W (ed) Die Kultur der 70er Jahre. W. Fink Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizian CJ (2006) Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the US Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s. Rev Econ Stat 88:748–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritsch M (2008) How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Bus Econ 30:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimenstional analysis. Reg Stud 41(2):157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritsch M, Schröter A (2009) Are more start-ups really better? Quantity and quality of new businesses and their effect on regional development. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2009-070Google Scholar
  29. Gartner WB (1989) Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrep Theory Pract 14(1):27–37Google Scholar
  30. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100:1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaeser EL, Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2010) Urban economics and entrepreneurship. J Urban Econ 67:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grabher G (1993) The weakness of strong ties. In: Grabher G (ed) The embedded firm. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Inglehart R (1977) The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among western publics. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Inglehart R (1990) Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarausch KH (2006) Krise oder Aufbruch? Historische Annäherungen an die 1970er-Jahre. Zeithist Forsch [Studies in Contemporary History] 3:334–341Google Scholar
  36. Klepper SJ (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 86:532–583Google Scholar
  37. Klepper SJ (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of US automobile industry. Ind Corp Change 11:645–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klepper SJ (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the US automobile industry. Manag Sci 53:616–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koster S (2007) The entrepreneurial and replication function of new firm formation. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 98(5):667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuznets SS (1971) Economic growth of nations, total output and productivity structure. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. LaFountain C (2005) Where do firms locate? Testing competing models of agglomeration. J Urban Econ 58:338–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyotard J-F (1993) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge, 9th printing (first pub 1984). University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  43. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1993) Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Ind Corp Change 2:45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Ind Corp Change 6:83–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Metcalfe JS (2005) Evolutionary concepts in relation to evolutionary economics. In: Dopfer K (ed) The evolutionary foundations of economics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Econ Geogr 87(3):237–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13:343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Redding SJ, Sturm DM (2008) The costs of remoteness: evidence from German division and reunification. Am Econ Rev 95:1766–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scarpetta SP, Hemmings P, Tressel T, Woo J (2002) The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: evidence from micro and industry data. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 329Google Scholar
  52. Sorenson O, Auida PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States 1940–1989. Am J Sociol 106:224–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Südekum J (2008) Convergence of skill composition across German regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teece D, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Ind Corp Change 3:537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter SG (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. J Econ Behav Org 23:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Temple J, Wößmann L (2006) Dualism and cross-country growth regressions. J Econ Growth 11:187–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Eck N, Waltman L (2008) Appropriate similarity measures for author cocitation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:1653–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Praag M, van Stel A (2011) The more business owners the merrier? Scales Research Reports, H201010Google Scholar
  59. White HD (2003) Author cocitation analysis and Pearson’s r. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(13):1250–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zagler M (2009) Economic growth, structural change, and search unemployment. J Econ 96:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of GroningenGroningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations