Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 543–562 | Cite as

Labor market integration policies and the convergence of regions: the role of skills and technology diffusion

  • Herbert DawidEmail author
  • Simon Gemkow
  • Philipp Harting
  • Michael Neugart
Regular Article


We study the role of different labor market integration policies on economic performance and convergence of two distinct regions in an agent-based model. Production is characterized by a complementarity between the quality of the capital stock and the specific skills of workers using the capital stock. Hence, productivity changes in a region are influenced both by the investment of local firms in high quality capital goods and by the evolution of the specific skill distribution of workers employed in the region. We show that various labor market integration policies yield, via differing regional worker flows, to distinct regional distributions of specific skills. Through this mechanism, relative regional prices are affected, determining the shares that the regions can capture from overall consumption good demand. There occurs a trade-off between aggregate output and convergence of regions with closed labor markets resulting in relatively high convergence but low output, and more integrated labor markets yielding higher output but lower convergence. Furthermore, results differ substantially in several respects as distinct labor market opening policies are applied.


Labor market integration Convergence Skill complementarity Agent-based model Regional economics 

JEL Classification

C63 J61 



We are gratefully to an anonymous referee and the editors of this special issues for helpful comments. This work was carried out in conjunction with the EURACE project (EU IST FP6 STREP grant 035086) which is a consortium lead by S. Cincotti (University of Genova), H. Dawid (University of Bielefeld), C. Deissenberg (Université de la Mediterrané), K. Erkan (TUBITAK National Research Institute of Electronics and Cryptology), M. Gallegati (Università Politecnica delle Marche), M. Holcombe (University of Sheffield), M. Marchesi (Università di Cagliari), C. Greenough (STFC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory).

Supplementary material

191_2011_245_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
(PDF 1.12 MB)


  1. Acemoglu D (2009) Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Boustan L, Hoxby C, Vandenbussche J (2009) The causal impact of education on economic growth: evidence from U.S. Harvard University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassanini A, Scarpetta S (2002) Does human capital matter for growth in OECD countries? A pooled mean group approach. Econ Lett 74:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeri T, Bertola G, Brücker H, Coricelli F, Dolado J, Fitzgerald J, de la Fuente A, Garibaldi P, Hanson G, Jimeno J, Portes R, Saint-Paul G, Spilimbergo A (2002) Who’s afraid of the big enlargement? Economic and social implications of the European Union’s prospective eastern expansion, CEPR policy paper no. 7, CEPR LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Canova F, Marcet A (1995) The poor stay poor: non-convergence across countries and regions CEPR discussion paper no. 1265Google Scholar
  7. Chiaromonte F, Dosi G (1993) Heterogeneity, competition and macroeconomic dynamics. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 4:39–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawid H, Gemkow S, Harting P, Neugart M (2009) On the effects of skill upgrading in the presence of spatial labor market frictions: an agent-based analysis of spatial policy design. JASSS 12:4Google Scholar
  9. Dawid H, Gemkow S, Harting P, Neugart M, Wersching K (2008) Skills, innovation and growth: an agent-based policy analysis. Jahrb Natlökon Stat/J Econ Stat 228:251–275Google Scholar
  10. Delli Gatti D, Guilmi C, Gaffeo E, Giulioni G, Gallegati M, Palestrini A (2005) A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. J Econ Behav Organ 56:489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2010) Schumpeter meeting Keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycle. J Econ Dyn Control 34:1748–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dosi G, Marsili O, Orsenigo L, Salvatore R (1995) Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures. Small Bus Econ 7:411–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffith R, Redding S, van Reenen J (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Rev Econ Stat 86:883–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Growiec J (2008) Productivity differences across OECD countries. In: The World technology frontier revisited IBS working paper No.1/2008 institute for structural research, pp 1970–2000Google Scholar
  15. Haber G (2008) Monetary and fiscal policy analysis with an agent-based macroeconomic model. Jahrb Natlökon Stat/J Econ Stat 228:276–295Google Scholar
  16. Howitt P (2000) Endogenous growth and cross-country differences. Am Econ Rev 90:829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110:1127–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller W (2004) International technology diffusion. J Econ Lit 42:752–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L, Winter S (2001) Competition and industrial policies in a ’History-Friendly’ model of the evolution of the computer industry. J Ind Organ 19:635–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mankiw GN, Romer P, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Silverberg G, Verspagen B (1993) Collective learning, innovation and growth in a boundedly rational, evolutionary world. J Evol Econ 4:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tesfatsion L, Judd KE (2006) Handbook of computational economics II: agent-based computational economics. North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  25. Wong K, Yip KC (1999) Education, economic growth, and brain drain. J Econ Dyn Control 23:699–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Dawid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simon Gemkow
    • 1
  • Philipp Harting
    • 1
  • Michael Neugart
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business Administration and EconomicsBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Department of Law, Business, and EconomicsTechnical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations