Abstract
Rigorous modelling of the spherical gravitational potential spectra from the volumetric density and geometry of an attracting body is discussed. Firstly, we derive mathematical formulas for the spatial analysis of spherical harmonic coefficients. Secondly, we present a numerically efficient algorithm for rigorous forward modelling. We consider the finite-amplitude topographic modelling methods as special cases, with additional postulates on the volumetric density and geometry. Thirdly, we implement our algorithm in the form of computer programs and test their correctness with respect to the finite-amplitude topography routines. For this purpose, synthetic and realistic numerical experiments, applied to the gravitational field and geometry of the Moon, are performed. We also investigate the optimal choice of input parameters for the finite-amplitude modelling methods. Fourth, we exploit the rigorous forward modelling for the determination of the spherical gravitational potential spectra inferred by lunar crustal models with uniform, laterally variable, radially variable, and spatially (3D) variable bulk density. Also, we analyse these four different crustal models in terms of their spectral characteristics and band-limited radial gravitation. We demonstrate applicability of the rigorous forward modelling using currently available computational resources up to degree and order 2519 of the spherical harmonic expansion, which corresponds to a resolution of ~ 2.2 km on the surface of the Moon. Computer codes, a user manual and scripts developed for the purposes of this study are publicly available to potential users.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arfken GB, Weber HJ (2005) Mathematical methods for physicists, 6th edn. Elsevier, New York, p 1182
Asgharzadeh MF, von Frese RRB, Kim HR, Leftwich TE, Kim JW (2007) Spherical prism gravity effects by Gauss–Legendre quadrature integration. Geophys J Int 169:1–11
Athy LF (1930) Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bull 14:1–24
Audet D, Fowler A (1992) A mathematical model for compaction in sedimentary basins. Geophys J Int 110:577–590
Balmino G (1994) Gravitational potential harmonics from the shape of an homogeneous body. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 60:331–364
Balmino G, Lambeck K, Kaula WM (1973) A spherical harmonic analysis of the Earth’s topography. J Geophys Res 78:478–481
Balmino G, Vales N, Bonvalot S, Briais A (2012) Spherical harmonic modelling to ultra-high degree of Bouguer and isostatic anomalies. J Geodesy 86:499–520
Boisvert RF, Howe SE, Kahaner DK (1984) Guide to available mathematical software. NBSIR 84-2824, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA
Casenave F, Métivier L, Pajot-Métivier G, Panet I (2016) Fast computation of general forward gravitation problems. J Geodesy 90:655–675
Chen W, Tenzer R (2017) Moho modeling using FFT technique. Pure Appl Geophys 174:1743–1757
Driscoll JR, Healy DM (1994) Computing Fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere. Adv Appl Math 15:202–250
D’Urso MG (2013) On the evaluation of the gravity effects of polyhedral bodies and a consistent treatment of related singularities. J Geodesy 87:239–252
Flury J, Rummel R (2009) On the geoid-quasigeoid separation in mountain areas. J Geodesy 83:829–847
Fukushima T (2012a) Recursive computation of finite difference of associated Legendre functions. J Geodesy 86:745–754
Fukushima T (2012b) Numerical computation of spherical harmonics of arbitrary degree and order by extending exponent of floating point numbers. J Geodesy 86:271–285
Gerstl M (1980) On the recursive computation of the integrals of the associated Legendre functions. Manuscr Geod 5:181–199
Gleason DM (1985) Partial sums of Legendre series via Clenshaw summation. Manuscr Geod 10:115–130
Grombein T, Luo X, Seitz K, Heck B (2014) A wavelet-based assessment of topographic-isostatic reduction for GOCE gravity gradients. Surv Geophys 35:959–982
Grombein T, Seitz K, Heck B (2016) The Rock–Water–Ice topographic gravity field model RWI_TOPO_2015 and its comparison to a conventional Rock-Equivalent version. Surv Geophys 37:937–976
Haagmans R, de Min E, van Gelderen M (1993) Fast evaluation of convolution integral on the sphere using 1D-FFT and a comparison with existing methods for Stokes integral. Manuscr Geod 18:227–241
Han S-C, Schmerr N, Neumann G, Holmes S (2014) Global characteristics of porosity and density stratification within the lunar crust from GRAIL gravity and Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter topography data. Geophys Res Lett 41:1882–1889
Heck B, Seitz K (2007) A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling. J Geodesy 81:121–136
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
Hirt C, Kuhn M (2014) Bandlimited topographic mass distribution generates full-spectrum gravity field: gravity forward modeling in the spectral and spatial domains revisited. J Geophys Res 119:3646–3661
Hirt C, Kuhn M (2017) Convergence and divergence in spherical harmonic series of the gravitational field generated by high-resolution planetary topography—a case study for the Moon. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005298
Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalized associated Legendre functions. J Geodesy 76:279–299
James PB, Zuber MT, Phillips RJ (2013) Crustal thickness and support of topography on Venus. J Geophys Res 118:859–875
Jansen JC, Andrews-Hanna JC, Li Y, Lucey PG, Taylor GJ, Goossens S, Lemoine FG, Mazarico E, Head JW III, Milbury C, Kiefer WS, Soderblom JM, Zuber MT (2017) Small-scale density variations in the lunar crust revealed by GRAIL. Icarus 291:107–123
Jekeli C (1981) The downward continuation to the Earth’s surface of truncated spherical and ellipsoidal harmonic series of the gravity and height anomalies. Report no. 323, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Kaula WM (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy: applications of satellite to geodesy. Dover, New York, p 124
Kellogg OD (1929) Foundations of potential theory. Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, p 384
Konopliv AS, Park RS, Yuan D-N, Asmar SW, Watkins MM, Williams JG, Fahnestock E, Kruizinga G, Paik M, Strekalov D, Harvey N, Smith DE, Zuber MT (2013) The JPL lunar gravity field to spherical harmonic degree 660 from the GRAIL primary mission. J Geophys Res Planets 118:1415–1434
Konopliv AS, Park RS, Yuan D-N, Asmar SW, Watkins MM, Williams JG, Fahnestock E, Kruizinga G, Paik M, Strekalov D, Harvey N, Smith DE, Zuber MT (2014) High-resolution lunar gravity fields from the GRAIL Primary and Extended Missions. Geophys Res Lett 41:1452–1458
Ku CC (1977) A direct computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies caused by 2- and 3-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization by equivalent-point method and a simplified cubic spline. Geophysics 42:610–622
Kuhn M, Hirt C (2016) Topographic gravitational potential up to second-order derivatives: an examination of approximation errors caused by rock-equivalent topography (RET). J Geodesy 90:883–902
Kuhn M, Featherstone WE, Kirby JF (2009) Complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies over Australia. Aust J Earth Sci 56:213–223
Lachapelle G (1976) A spherical harmonic expansion of the isostatic reduction potential. Bolletino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini 35:281–299
Lee WHK, Kaula WM (1967) A spherical harmonic analysis of the Earth’s topography. J Geophys Res 72:753–758
Lemoine FG, Goossens S, Sabaka TJ, Nicholas JB, Mazarico E, Rowlands DD, Loomis BD, Chinn DS, Caprette DS, Neumann GA, Smith DE, Zuber MT (2013) High-degree gravity models from GRAIL primary mission data. J Geophys Res Planets 118:1676–1699
Lemoine FG, Goossens S, Sabaka TJ, Nicholas JB, Mazarico E, Rowlands DD, Loomis BD, Chinn DS, Neumann GA, Smith DE, Zuber MT (2014) GRGM900C: a degree 900 lunar gravity model from GRAIL primary and extended mission data. Geophys Res Lett 41:3382–3389
Li Z, Hao T, Xu Y, Xu Y (2011) An efficient and adaptive approach for modelling gravity effects in spherical coordinates. J Appl Geophys 73:221–231
Mazarico E, Genova A, Goosens S, Lemoine FG, Neumann GA, Zuber MT, Smith DE, Solomon SC (2014) The gravity field, orientation, and ephemeris of Mercury from MESSENGER observations after three years in orbit. J Geophys Res 119:2417–2436
Moritz H (1989) Advanced physical geodesy, 2nd edn. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, p 500
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geodesy 74:552–560
Neumann GA, Zuber MT, Wieczorek MA, McGovern PJ, Lemoine FG, Smith DE (2004) Crustal structure of Mars from gravity and topography. J Geophys Res 109:E08002
Novák P, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal representation of the topographical potential and its vertical gradient. J Geodesy 78:691–706
Novák P, Grafarend EW (2006) The effect of topographical and atmospheric masses on space borne gravimetric and gradiometric data. Stud Geophys Geod 50:549–582
Paul MK (1978) Recurrence relations for integrals of associated Legendre functions. Bull Géod 52:177–190
Pavlis NK, Rapp RH (1990) The development of an isostatic gravitational model to degree 360 and its use in global gravity modelling. Geophys J Int 100:369–378
Pohánka V (1988) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophys Prospect 36:733–751
Rexer M, Hirt C, Claessens S, Tenzer R (2016) Layer-based modelling of the Earth’s gravitational potential up to 10-km scale in spherical harmonics in spherical and ellipsoidal approximation. Surv Geophys 37:1035–1074
Root BC, Novák P, Dirkx D, Kaban M, van der Wal W, Vermeersen LLA (2016) On a spectral method for forward gravity field modelling. J Geodyn 97:22–30
Roussel C, Verdun J, Cali J, Masson F (2015) Complete gravity field of an ellipsoidal prism by Gauss–Legendre quadrature. Geophys J Int 203:2220–2236
Rummel R, Rapp RH, Sünkel H, Tscherning CC (1988) Comparisons of global topographic/isostatic models to the Earth’s observed gravity field. Report no. 388, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Sansò F, Sideris MG (2013) Geoid determination: theory and methods. Springer, Berlin, p 734
Sjöberg LE (2006) A refined conversion from normal height to orthometric height. Stud Geophys Geod 50:595–606
Smith DE, Zuber MT, Neumann GA, Lemoine FG, Mazarico E, Torrence MH, McGarry JF, Rowlands DD, Head JW III, Duxbury TH, Aharonson O, Lucey PG, Robinson MS, Barnouin OS, Cavanaugh JF, Sun X, Liiva P, Mao D-D, Smith JC, Bartels AE (2010) Initial observations from the lunar orbiter laser altimeter (LOLA). Geophys Res Lett 37:L18204
Sun W, Sjöberg LE (2001) Convergence and optimal truncation of binomial expansions used in isostatic compensations and terrain corrections. J Geodesy 74:627–636
Tenzer R, Novák P, Gladkikh V (2012) The bathymetric stripping corrections to gravity field quantities for a depth-dependent model of the seawater density. Mar Geod 35:1–23
Tenzer R, Hirt C, Claessens S, Novák P (2015) Spatial and spectral representations of the geoid-to-quasigeoid correction. Surv Geophys 36:627–658
Tenzer R, Hirt C, Novák P, Pitoňák M, Šprlák M (2016) Contribution of mass density heterogeneities to the quasigeoid-to-geoid separation. J Geodesy 90:65–80
Torge W, Müller J (2012) Geodesy, 4th edn. De Gruyter, Berlin, p 433
Turcotte DL, Schubert G (2014) Geodynamics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 626
Uieda L, Barbosa VCF, Braitenberg C (2016) Tesseroids: forward-modelling gravitational field in spherical coordinates. Geophysics 81:41–48
Vajda P, Ellmann A, Meurers B, Vaníček P, Novák P, Tenzer R (2008) Global ellipsoid-referenced topographic, bathymetric and stripping corrections to gravity disturbance. Stud Geophys Geod 52:19–34
Vaníček P, Huang J, Novák P, Pagiatakis S, Véronneau M, Martinec Z, Featherstone WE (1999) Determination of the boundary values for the Stokes–Helmert problem. J Geodesy 73:180–192
Wang YM, Yang X (2013) On the spherical and spheroidal harmonic expansion of the gravitational potential of the topographic masses. J Geodesy 87:909–921
Werner RA (2017) The solid angle hidden in polyhedron gravitation formulations. J Geodesy 91:307–328
Werner RA, Scheeres DJ (1997) Exterior gravitation of a polyhedron derived and compared with harmonic and mascon gravitation representations of asteroid 4769 Castalia. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 65:313–344
Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis JF, Wobbe F (2013) Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Trans AGU 94(45):409–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001
Wieczorek MA (2007) Gravity and topography of the terrestrial planets. Treatise on geophysics, vol 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 165–206
Wieczorek MA (2015) Gravity and topography of the terrestrial planets. Treatise on geophysics, vol 10, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 153–193
Wieczorek MA, Phillips RJ (1998) Potential anomalies on a sphere: applications to the thickness of the lunar crust. J Geophys Res 103:1715–1724
Wieczorek MA, Neumann GA, Nimmo F, Kiefer WS, Taylor GJ, Melosh HJ, Phillips RJ, Solomon SC, Andrews-Hanna JC, Asmar SW, Konopliv AS, Lemoine FG, Smith DE, Watkins MM, Williams JG, Zuber MT (2013) The crust of the Moon as seen by GRAIL. Science 339:671–675
Wieczorek MA, Meschede M, Oshchepkov I (2015) SHTOOLS—tools for working with spherical harmonics (v3.1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20920
Wild-Pfeiffer F (2008) A comparison of different mass elements for use in gravity gradiometry. J Geodesy 82:637–653
Zuber MT, Smith DE, Lehman DH, Hoffman TL, Asmar SW, Watkins MM (2013) Gravity recovery and interior laboratory (GRAIL): mapping the lunar interior from crust to core. Space Sci Rev 178:3–24
Acknowledgements
This research was supported partially by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project DP160104095). We thank Mark Wieczorek for sharing his own results of topography gravitational potential fields and the surface grain density, and Greg Neumann for his advice on the LOLA topography grid data. Thoughtful and constructive comments of the three anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also extended to the editor-in-chief Prof. Jürgen Kusche and to the responsible editor Prof. Ilias N. Tziavos for handling our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Computer codes, bash scripts, and manual
Appendix A: Computer codes, bash scripts, and manual
The computer codes, LINUX bash scripts, and a user manual can be downloaded from the public-domain folder available at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0By2RsmhxzXIyLU96SzZPclVNUnM. It contains the following files:
-
1.
manual.pdf Short description of the programs, input parameters, and functionality,
-
2.
gravtess_uniform.f FORTRAN source code for calculation of the SHCs inferred by the uniform lunar crust,
-
3.
gravtess_lateral.f FORTRAN source code for calculation of the SHCs inferred by the lunar crust with laterally variable density,
-
4.
gravtess_radial.f FORTRAN source code for calculation of the SHCs inferred by the lunar crust with radially variable density,
-
5.
gravtess_spatial.f FORTRAN source code for calculation of the SHCs inferred by the lunar crust with spatially variable density,
-
6.
alf_sr_v121305.f FORTRAN source code for calculation of the integrals of the associated Legendre functions of the first kind,
-
7.
FFTCC.f FORTRAN source code necessary for the 1D discrete Fourier transform,
-
8.
script_uniform.sh Script for compiling the FORTRAN code gravtess_uniform.f90 and executing the program,
-
9.
script_lateral.sh Script for compiling the FORTRAN code gravtess_lateral.f90 and executing the program,
-
10.
script_radial.sh Script for compiling the FORTRAN code gravtess_radial.f90 and executing the program,
-
11.
script_spatial.sh Script for compiling the FORTRAN code gravtess_spatial.f90 and executing the program,
-
12.
depth_density_0p175_350_2850.dat Sample density file required by the programs gravtess_radial and gravtess_spatial,
-
13.
pressure_0p175_350_2850.dat Sample pressure file required by the program gravtess_spatial.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprlák, M., Han, SC. & Featherstone, W.E. Forward modelling of global gravity fields with 3D density structures and an application to the high-resolution (~ 2 km) gravity fields of the Moon. J Geod 92, 847–862 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1098-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1098-7