Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 90, Issue 11, pp 1279–1291 | Cite as

A statistical characterization of the Galileo-to-GPS inter-system bias

Original Article

Abstract

Global navigation satellite system operates using independent time scales and thus inter-system time offsets have to be determined to enable multi-constellation navigation solutions. GPS/Galileo inter-system bias and drift are evaluated here using different types of receivers: two mass market and two professional receivers. Moreover, three different approaches are considered for the inter-system bias determination: in the first one, the broadcast Galileo to GPS time offset is used to align GPS and Galileo time scales. In the second, the inter-system bias is included in the multi-constellation navigation solution and is estimated using the measurements available. Finally, an enhanced algorithm using constraints on the inter-system bias time evolution is proposed. The inter-system bias estimates obtained with the different approaches are analysed and their stability is experimentally evaluated using the Allan deviation. The impact of the inter-system bias on the position velocity time solution is also considered and the performance of the approaches analysed is evaluated in terms of standard deviation and mean errors for both horizontal and vertical components. From the experiments, it emerges that the inter-system bias is very stable and that the use of constraints, modelling the GPS/Galileo inter-system bias behaviour, significantly improves the performance of multi-constellation navigation.

Keywords

Galileo GGTO Allan variance Constraint 

References

  1. Afifi A, El-Rabbany A (2015) An improved model for single-frequency gps/galileo precise point positioning. Positioning 6:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan DW (1966) Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc. IEEE 54(2):221–230. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1966.4634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borio D, Gioia C, Mitchison N (2015) Identifying a low-frequency oscillation in Galileo IOV pseudorange rates. GPS Solut. doi: 10.1007/s10291-015-0443-7
  4. Bregni S (1997) Clock stability characterization and measurement in telecommunications. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 46(6):1284–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bregni S (2002) Synchronization of digital telecommunications networks. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown RG, Hwang PYC (1996) Introduction to random signals and applied kalman filtering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cernigliaro A, Valloreia S, Galleani L, Tavella P (2013) GNSS space clocks: performance analysis. In: Proceedings of the international conference on localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS), pp 1–5 (2013). doi: 10.1109/ICL-GNSS.2013.6577251
  8. Dierendonck AJV, McGraw B, Brown RG (1984) Relationship between Allan variances and kalman filter parameters. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth annual precise time and time interval (PTTI) applications and planning meeting. Greenbelt, MD (1984)Google Scholar
  9. European Union: European GNSS (Galileo) Open service signal in space interface control document. OS SIS IC 1.1, European Union (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Gioia C (2014) GNSS navigation in difficult environments: hybridization and reliability. Ph.D. thesis, University Parthenope of Naples, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  11. Gioia C, Borio D, Angrisano A, Gaglione S, Fortuny J (2015) A Galileo IOV assessment: measurement and position domain. GPS Solut 19:187–199. doi: 10.1007/s10291-014-0379-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gioia C, Pisoni F, Fortuny J: Estimation of the GPS to Galileo time offset and its validation on a mass market receiver. In: 7th ESA workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing (NAVITEC) (2014)Google Scholar
  13. Hahn J (2013) Galileo and coordinated universal time leap seconds. ITU NewsGoogle Scholar
  14. Hahn JH, Powers ED (2007) A report on GPS and Galileo time offset coordination efforts. Tech. report, joint 21st EFTF and FCS (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Hewitson S, Wang J (2004) Impact of dynamic information on GNSS receiver integrity monitoring. In: International Symposium on GNSS/GPS. Sydney, Australia (2004)Google Scholar
  16. International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems : GNSS Timescale Description. Tech. rep., United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (2012)Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan ED, Hegarty C (2005) Understanding GPS: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Artech House, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  18. Klobuchar JA (1987) Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users. Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst AES- 23(N. 3), 325–331 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. Lindsey WC, Chie CM (1976) Theory of oscillator instability based upon structure functions. Proc. IEEE 64(12):1652–1666. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1976.10408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Navstar GPS Directorate (2012) Global positioning systems directorate systems engineering & integration interface specification IS-GPS-200. Tech. rep, Navstar GPS DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Driscoll C, Lachapelle G, Tamazin ME (2010) Investigation of the benefits of combined GPS/GLONASS receivers in urban environments. In: 5th ESA workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing, (NAVITEC). Royal Institute of Navigation, London (2010)Google Scholar
  22. Parkinson B, Spilker J, Axelrad P, Enge P (1996) Global positioning system: theory and applications, vol I. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington D.CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paziewski J, Wielgosz P (2015) Accounting for Galileo-GPS inter-system biases in precise satellite positioning. J Geod 89:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piriz R, Mozo A, Tobias G, Fernandez V, Tavella P, Sesia I, Cerretto G, Hahn J (2008) GNSS interoperability: offset between reference time scales and timing biases. Metrologia 45:87–102Google Scholar
  25. Sastamoinen J (1993) Contribution to the theory of atmospheric refraction, part II refraction correction in satellite geodesy. Bull Geod 107:13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of Transportation: 2008 federal radionavigation plan (2008) Tech. rep., U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of Transportation. DOT-VNTSC-RITA-08-02/DoD-4650.5 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. Vanschoenbeek I, Bonhoure B, Boschetti M, Legenne J (2007) GNSS time offset effects on GPS-Galileo interoperability performance. Inside GNSS 5:60–70Google Scholar
  28. Xu G (2003) GPS: theory. Algorithms and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Piksel S.p.A.MilanoItaly
  2. 2.European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)Institute for the Protection and Security of Citizen (IPSC), Security Technology Assessment (STA) UnitIspra (VA)Italy

Personalised recommendations