Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing consistency of Chang’E-1 and SELENE reference frames using nearly-colocated laser altimetry footprint positions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 August 2011

Abstract

The consistency of the Chang’E-1 and SELENE reference frames as realized by the footprint positions of laser altimetry measurements of the lunar surface during both missions was analyzed using a global 12-parameter model for small (with respect to unity) deformations and rigid body motions. The rigid body motion and deformation parameters between the two reference frames estimated from nearly-colocated without tie measurements are found to be consistent, i.e., nearly zero for the estimates of the translations, rotations and shear parameters. However, the estimated three strain parameters, which are similar in magnitude and sign, reveal a prominent scale difference, between the Chang’E-1 and SELENE reference frames, of about 0.9 × 10−5. The scale difference can be attributed to calibration of the data sets using the known coordinates of the lunar laser ranging stations all located on the near side of the Moon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altamimi Z (2005) ITRF and co-location sites. IERS Tech Note 33: 8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Araki H, Tazawa S, Noda H, Ishihara Y, Goossens S, Sasaki S, Kawano N, Kamiya I, Otake H, Oberst J, Shum CK (2009) Lunar global shape and polar topography derived from Kaguya-LALT laser altimetry. Science 323: 898–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archinal BA, Rosiek MR, Kirk RL, Redding BL (2006) The Unified Lunar Control Network 2005, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1367, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1367/. Accessed Sep 2006

  • Cai J, Wang J, Wu J, Hu C, Grafarend E, Chen J (2008) Horizontal deformation rate analysis based on multi-epoch GPS measurements in Shanghai. J Surv Eng, ACSE, 134:4(132)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards KE, Colvin TR, Becker TL, Cook D, Davies ME, Duxbury TC, Eliason EM, Lee EM, McEwen AS, Morgan H, Robinson MS, Sorensen T (1996) Global digital mapping of the moon. Lunar Planet Sci XXVII: 335

    Google Scholar 

  • Fok HS (2009) Evaluation of international terrestrial reference frame colocated ties through compatibility testing. J Surv Eng 135(1): 27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E (1982) Six lectures on geodesy and global geodynamics, lecture II: space and time operational geodesy. In: Moritz H, Sunkel H (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Summer School in the Mountains, Mitt. Geod. Inst. TU Graz, Folge 41, Graz, pp 531–685

  • Helmert FR (1876) Die Genauigkeit der Formel von Peters zur Berechnung des wahrscheinlichen Fehlers directer Beobachtungen gleicher Genauigkeit. Astronomische Nachrichten 88: 192–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İz HB (2009) New parameters of geometrically best fitting lunar figures. J Appl Geod 3: 155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İz HB, Shum CK, Ding XL, Dai CL (2010a) Orientation of the geometrically Best fitting triaxial lunar ellipsoid with respect to the mean earth/polar axis reference frame. J Geod Sci 1(1): 52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • İz HB, Chen YQ, King BA, Ding XL, Wu C (2010b) Deformation analysis of the unified lunar control networks. J Appl Geod 3: 231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • İz HB, Shum CK, Chen YQ, Dai CL (2011) Improved geometric lunar figures from Chang’E-1 and SELENE laser altimetry. J Appl Geod (in press)

  • JAXA (2009) https://www.soac.selene.isas.jaxa.jp/archive/index.html.en

  • Kotsakis C (2009) A study on the reference frame consistency in recent earth gravitational models. J Geod 83(1): 31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novozhilov VV (1961) Theory of elasticity. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping J, Huang Q, Yan J, Cao J, Tang G, Shu R (2009) Lunar topographic model CLTM-s01 from Chang’E-1 Laser Altimeter. Sci China Ser G-Phys Mech Astron 52(7): 1105–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncoli RB (2005) Lunar Constants and Models Document, JPL D-32296. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön S (2007) Affine Distortion of Small GPS Networks with Large Height Differences. GPS Solut 11: 107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shum CK, Fok HS, Yi Y, Williams JG, Araki H, Noda H, Goossens S, Matsumoto K, Ping J, Huang Q, İz HB, Chen Y (2009) Accuracy assessment of lunar topography models. In: The 3rd KAGUYA (SELENE) Science Working Team Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 14–15 January 2009

  • Toutenburg H (1982) Prior information in linear models. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG, Boggs DH, Folkner WM (2008) DE421 lunar orbit, physical librations, and surface coordinates, JPL Memorandum IOM 335-JW, DB, WF-20080314-001, March 14. ftp://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/eph/planets/ioms/de421_Moon_coord_iom.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Bâki Iz.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0505-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iz, H.B., Chen, Y.Q., Shum, C.K. et al. Assessing consistency of Chang’E-1 and SELENE reference frames using nearly-colocated laser altimetry footprint positions. J Geod 86, 109–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0495-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0495-6

Keywords

Navigation