Skip to main content

Validation of international reference ionosphere models using in situ measurements from GRACE K-band ranging system and CHAMP planar Langmuir probe

Journal of Geodesy volume 85, pages 921–929 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

The in situ measurements of electron contents from GRACE K-band (dual-frequency) ranging system and CHAMP planar Langmuir probe were used to validate the international reference ionosphere (IRI) models. The comparison using measurements from year 2003 to 2007 shows a general agreement between data and the model outputs. The improvement in the newer IRI model (IRI-2007) is evident with the measurements from the GRACE satellites orbiting at the higher altitude. We present the comparison between the models and data comprehensively for various cases in solar activity, local time, season, and latitude. The IRI models do not well predict the electron density in the years 2006 and later, when the solar activity is extremely low. The IRI models generally overestimate the electron density during local winter while they underestimate during local summer. In the equatorial region, the large difference at local sunrise lasts for all years and all seasons. The IRI models do not perform well in predicting the anomaly in the polar region such as the Weddell Sea Anomaly. These discrepancies are likely due to smoothed (12-month averaged) solar activity indices used in the IRI models and due to insufficient spherical harmonic representation not able to capture small spatial scales. In near future, further improvement on the IRI models is expected by assimilating those in situ satellite data by implementing higher resolution (spatial and temporal) parameterizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Afraimovich EL, Astafyeva EI, Oinats AV, Yasukevich YuV, Zhivetiev IV (2008) Global electron content: a new conception to track solar activity. Ann Geophys 26: 335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitza D (1990) International reference ionosphere: IRI-90. Nat Space Sci Data Cent., Rep. 90-22, Greenbelt, MD

  • Bilitza D (2001) International reference ionosphere 2000. Radio Sci 36: 261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitza D (2004) A correction for the IRI topside electron density model based on Alouette/ISIS topside sounder data. Adv Space Res 33: 838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitza D (2009) Evaluation of the IRI-2007 model options for the topside electron density. Adv Space Res 44: 701–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilitza D, Reinisch BW (2008) International reference ionosphere 2007: improvements and new parameters. Adv Space Res 42: 599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coco D (1991) GPS—satellites of opportunity for ionospheric monitoring. GPS World October 1991, 47–50

  • Coïsson P, Radicella SM, Nava B (2002) Comparisons of experimental topside electron concentration profiles with IRI and NeQuick models. Ann Geophys 45: 125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Coïsson P, Radicella SM, Leitinger R, Nava B (2006) Topside electron density in IRI and NeQuick: features and limitations. Adv Space Res 37(5): 934–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coïsson P, Radicella SM, Ciraolo L, Leitinger R, Nava B (2008) Global validation of IRI TEC for high and medium solar activity conditions. Adv Space Res 42(4): 770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezquer RG, Brunini C, Mosert M, Meza A, Oviedo RV, Kiorcheff E, Radicella SM (2004) GPS-VTEC measurements and IRI predictions in the South American sector. Adv Space Res 34: 2035–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller-Rowell TJ, Araujo-Pradere E, Codrescu M (2000) An empirical ionosphere storm-time correction model. Adv Space Res 25(1): 139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto L, Katoh H, Maruyama T, Minakoshi H, Watari S, Igarashi I (2002) Latitudinal variation of solar flux dependence in the topside plasma density: comparison between IRI model and observations. Adv Space Res 29: 877–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakowski N, Tsybulya K (2004) Comparison of ionospheric radio occultation CHAMP data with IRI 2001. Adv Radio Sci 2: 275–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakowski N, Wehrenpfennig A, Heise S, Reigber C, Luehr H, Grunwaldt L, Meehan TK (2002) GPS radio occultation measurements of the ionosphere from CHAMP: early results. Geophys Res Lett 29. doi:10.1029/2001GL014364

  • Jee G, Burns AG, Kim Y-H, Wang W (2009) Seasonal and solar activity variations of the Weddell Sea Anomaly observed in the TOPEX total electron content measurements. J Geophys Res 114: A04307. doi:10.1029/2008JA013801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Smith P, King J (1983) A new solar index which leads to improved foF2 predictions using the CCIR atlas. Telecommun J 50: 408–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Stolle C, Forster M, Watanabe S (2007) Solar activity dependence of the electron density in the equatorial anomaly regions observed by CHAMP. J Geophys Res 112: A11311. doi:10.1029/2007JA012616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara LF, Cooke DL, Valladares CE, Reinisch BW (2007) Comparison of CHAMP and Digisonde plasma frequencies at Jicamarca, Peru. Radio Sci 42: RS2005. doi:10.1029/2006RS003491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radicella SM, Leitinger R (2001) The evolution of the DGR approach to model electron density profiles. Adv Space Res 27: 35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigber C, Lühr H, Schwintzer H (2002) CHAMP mission status. Adv Space Res 30: 129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Thompson P, Watkins M (2004) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305: 503–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner S, Prölss W (1997) The position of the ionosphere trough as a function of local time and magnetic activity. Adv Space Res 20: 1717–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Choon-Ki Lee

    Present address: Division of Polar Earth-System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Inchon, South Korea

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory, Code 698, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

    Choon-Ki Lee & Shin-Chan Han

  2. Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Maryland at Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Choon-Ki Lee & Shin-Chan Han

  3. Heliophysics Laboratory, Code 612.4, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

    Dieter Bilitza

  4. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Dieter Bilitza

  5. Space Geodesy Research Division, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon, South Korea

    Jong-Kyun Chung

Authors
  1. Choon-Ki Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shin-Chan Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dieter Bilitza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jong-Kyun Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-Chan Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, CK., Han, SC., Bilitza, D. et al. Validation of international reference ionosphere models using in situ measurements from GRACE K-band ranging system and CHAMP planar Langmuir probe. J Geod 85, 921–929 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0442-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0442-6

Keywords

  • Ionosphere
  • Electron density
  • GRACE
  • CHAMP
  • IRI