Advertisement

Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 84, Issue 11, pp 683–698 | Cite as

Fast GNSS ambiguity resolution as an ill-posed problem

Original Article

Abstract

A linear observational equation system for real-time GNSS carrier phase ambiguity resolution (AR) is often severely ill-posed in the case of poor satellite geometry. An ill-posed system may result in unreliable or unsuccessful AR if no care is taken to mitigate this situation. In this paper, the GNSS AR model as an ill-posed problem is solved by regularizing its baseline and ambiguity parameters, respectively, with the threefold contributions: (i) The regularization parameter is reliably determined in context of minimizing mean square error of regularized solution where the covariance matrix of initial values of unknowns is used as an approximate smoothness term instead of the quadratic matrix of the true values of unknowns; (ii) The different models for computing initial values of unknowns are systematically discussed in order to address the potential schemes in real world applications; (iii) The superior performance of the regularized AR are demonstrated through the numerically random simulations as well as the real GPS experiments. The results show that the proposed regularization strategies can effectively mitigate the model’s ill-condition and improve the success AR probability of the observational system with a severely ill-posed problem.

Keywords

GNSS Ambiguity resolution Regularization Ill-posed problem Success probability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abidin H (1993) On-the-fly ambiguity resolution: formulation and results. Manuscr Geod 18: 380–405Google Scholar
  2. Apostol TM (1969) Multi-variable calculus and linear algerbra, with applications to differential equations and probability. Calculus. vol. 2. 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang X, Yang X, Zhou T (2005) MLAMBDA: a modified LAMBDA algorithm for integer least-squares estimation. J Geod 79: 552–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen D (1994) Development of a fast ambiguity search filtering (FASF) method for GPS carrier phase ambiguity resolution. UCGE Reports 20071, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar
  5. Counselman C, Gourevitch S (1981) Miniature interferometer terminals for earth surveying: ambiguity and multipath with the Global Positioning System. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 19(4): 244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui X, Yu Z, Tao B, Liu D (2001) Generalized surveying adjustment. Wuhan Technique University of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. de Jonge P, Tiberius C (1996) The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects. LGR-Series, Publications of the Delft Geodetic Computing Centre, No. 12Google Scholar
  8. Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4): 3949–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Euler H, Landau H (1992) Fast ambiguity resolution on-the-fly for real-time applications. In: Proceedings of the 6th international geodesy symposium on satellite positioning, Columbus, Ohio, 17–20 March, pp 650–659Google Scholar
  10. Frei E, Beulter G (1990) Rapid static positioning based on the fast ambiguity resolution approach ‘FARA’: theory and first results. Manuscr Geod 15: 326–356Google Scholar
  11. Grafarend E (2000) Mixed integer/real valued adjustment (IRA) problems: GPS initial cycle ambiguity resolution by means of LLL algorithm. GPS Solut 4: 31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gui Q, Han S (2007) New algorithm of GPS rapid positioning based on double k-type ridge estimation. J Surv Eng 133(4): 173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen P (1992) Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev 34: 561–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassibi A, Boyd S (1996) Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference. Decision and control, Kobe, Japan, pp 3245–3251Google Scholar
  15. Hassibi A, Boyd S (1998) Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS. IEEE Trans Signal Process 11(11): 2938–2952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatch R (1990) Instantaneous ambiguity resolution. Proc KIS’90, Banff, Canada, 10–13 Sept, pp: 299–308Google Scholar
  17. Li B, Shen Y (2008) Prior baseline information based fast GPS ambiguity resolution. Acta Geod et Cart Sin 37(4): 413–417 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Li B, Shen Y (2009) Fast GPS ambiguity resolution with available constraints. Geomat Inf Sci Wuhan Univ 34(1): 117–121 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Li B, Shen Y (2010) GNSS ambiguity resolution with constraints from normal equations. J Surv Eng 136(2): 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Shen Y, Xu P (2008) Assessment of stochastic models for GPS measurements with different types of receivers. Chi Sci Bull 53(20): 3219–3225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu L, Hsu H, Zhu Y, Ou J (1999) A new approach to GPS ambiguity decorrelation. J Geod 73: 478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ou J, Wang Z (2004) An improved regularization method to resolve integer ambiguity in rapid positioning using single frequency GPS receivers. Chin Sci Bull 49(2): 196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park C, Kim I, Lee J, Jee G (1996) Efficient ambiguity resolution using constraint equation. In: Proceedings of PLANS96, IEEE, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  24. Shen Y, Li B (2007) Regularized solution to fast GPS ambiguity resolution. J Surv Eng 133(4): 168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Teunissen P (1993) Least squares estimation of integer GPS ambiguities. In: Invited lecture, Sect. IV theory and methodology, IAG General Meeting, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Teunissen P (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70: 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teunissen P (1997) A canonical theory for short GPS baselines, Part I: the baseline precision. J Geod 71: 320–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teunissen P (1998) Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping. J Geod 72: 606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teunissen P (1999) An optimality property of the integer least-squares estimator. J Geod 73: 587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Teunissen P (2001) Integer estimation in the presence of biases. J Geod 75: 399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teunissen P (2002) The parameter distributions of the integer GPS model. J Geod 76: 41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teunissen, P, Kleusberg, A (eds) (1998) GPS for geodesy. 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  33. Teunissen P, Simons D, Tiberius C (2008) Probability and observation theory. In: Lecture notes Delft University of Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  34. Tikhonov A (1963) Regularization of ill-posed problems. English translation of Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 151(1): 49–52Google Scholar
  35. Verhagen S (2004) Integer ambiguity validation: an open problem. GPS Solut 8(1): 36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verhagen S (2005) The GNSS integer ambiguities: estimation and validation, PhD thesis, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  37. Weinziel S (2000) Introduction to Monte Carlo methods, 23 Jun 2000. http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0006269
  38. Wübbena G (1989) The GPS adjustment software package-GEONAP concepts and models. In: Proceedings of the 5th geodesy symposium on satellite positioning, pp 452–461Google Scholar
  39. Xu P (1998a) Mixed integer geodetic observation models and integer programming with applications to GPS ambiguity resolution. J Geod Soc Jpn 44(3): 169–187Google Scholar
  40. Xu P (1998b) Truncated SVD methods for discrete linear ill-posed problems. Geophys J Int 135: 505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu P (2001) Random simulation and GPS decorrelation. J Geod 75: 408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu P (2006) Voronoi cells, probabilistic bounds and hypothesis testing in mixed integer linear models. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(2): 3122–3138Google Scholar
  43. Xu P, Cannon E, Lachapelle G (1995) Mixed integer programming for the resolution of GPS carrier phase ambiguities. In: Presented at the IUGG95 Assembly, Boulder, 2–14 JulyGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu P, Cannon E, Lachapelle G (1999) Stabilizing ill-conditioned linear complementarity problems. J Geod 73(4): 204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu P, Shen Y, Fukuda Y, Liu Y (2006) Variance component estimation in linear inverse ill-posed models. J Geod 80: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu P, Rummel R (1994) A simulation study of smoothness methods in recovery of regional gravity fields. Geophys J Int 117: 472–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu L, Lai Y, Shah M, Mahmood S (2007) Efficiency of carrier-phase integer ambiguity resolution for precise GPS positioning in noisy environments. J Geod 81: 149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surveying and Geo-Informatics EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Advanced Surveying Engineering of State Bureau of Surveying and MappingShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and TechnologyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations