Abstract
Following an earlier recognition of degraded monthly geopotential recovery from GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) due to prolonged passage through a short repeat (low order resonant) orbit, we extend these insights also to CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload) and GOCE (Gravity field and steady state Ocean Circulation Explorer). We show wide track-density variations over time for these orbits in both latitude and longitude, and estimate that geopotential recovery will be as widely affected as well within all these regimes, with lesser track density leading to poorer recoveries. We then use recent models of atmospheric density to estimate the future orbit of GRACE and warn of degraded performance as other low order resonances are encountered in GRACE’s free fall. Finally implications for the GOCE orbit are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan RR (1971) Resonant effect in inclination for close satellites. Royal Aircraft Establ Techn Rep 71245, Farnborough, Hants; see also similar paper in Planet Space Sci (1973) 21:205–225
Bettadpur S, Poole S, Ries J (2004) GRACE mission status and gravity field product improvement plans; paper G23-A01, AGU Fall Meeting 2004
Bettadpur S (2006) Status of re-processed GRACE gravity field data products, EGU Vienna. Geophys Res Abstracts 8: 01563
Bezděk A (2004) Semianalytic theory of motion for LEO satellites under air drag. In: Proceedings of the 18th Interntl Symp on Space Flight Dynamics, Munich, Germany, 11–15 Oct., ESA SP-548, pp 615–620
Bezděk A (2006) Prediction of the orbital evolution for LEO geodetic satellites. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium. Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days, Berlin, 28–31 March
Bezděk A, Vokrouhlický D (2004) Semianalytic theory of motion for close-Earth spherical satellites including drag and gravitational perturbations. Planet Space Sci 52: 1233–1249
Biancale R, Lemoine J-M, Loyer S, Bruisma S, Perosanz F, Marty J-C, Sarrailh M, Vales N, Balmino G (2006) Monitoring variations of the geoid every 10 days from GRACE and LAGEOS satellite missions, EGU Vienna. Geophys Res Abstracts 8: 05546
Bruinsma S, Tamagnan D, Biancale R (2004) Atmospheric densities derived from CHAMP/STAR accelerometer observations. Planet Space Sci 52: 297–312
Gooding RH (1971) Lumped fifteenth-order harmonics in the geopotential. Nature Phys Sci 231: 168–169
Gooding RH , Wagner CA , Klokočník J , Kostelecký J, Gruber Ch (2007) CHAMP and GRACE resonances, and the gravity field of the Earth, COSPAR Beijing 2006, Science Direct—Advances Space Res. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.086
Klokočník J (1983) Orbital rates of Earth satellites at resonances to test the accuracy of Earth gravity field models. Celest Mech 30: 407–422
Klokočník J, Gooding RH, Kostelecký J (2003) On fine orbit selection for particular geodetic and oceanographic missions involving passage through resonances. J Geod 77: 30–40
Lemoine FJ, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang ZM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM 96, NASA/TP-1998–206861
Lemoine JM, Bruinsma S, Loyer S, Biancale R, Marty JC, Perosanz~F, Balmino G (2007) Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data, COSPAR Beijing 2006, Science Direct—Advances Space Res. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.062
Novák P, Austen C, Sharifi MA, Grafarend EW (2006) Mapping Earth’s gravitation using GRACE data. In: Flury J, Rummel R, Reigber C, Rothacher M, Boedecker G, Schreiber U (eds) Observation of the earth system from space. Springer, Berlin, ISBN:3–540–29520–8
Sehnal L (1990) Comparison of the thermosphere total density model TD 88 with CIRA 86. Adv Space Res 10(6): 27–31
Sneeuw N, Gerlach Ch, Feldvary L, Gruber T, Peters T, Rummel R, Švehla D (2005) One year of time-variable CHAMP-only gravity field models using kinematic orbits. In: Sansó F(eds) Proc IAG Gen Assembly, Sapporo 2003. Springer, Berlin, pp 288–293
Sünkel H (ed) (2002) From Eötvös to mGal+, Final Report, ESA/ ESTEC Contract #14287/00/NL/DC, www.esa.int/workshops/goce06
Tapley B, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber Ch (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Gophys Res Lett 31: L09607. doi:10.1029/2004GL010020
Wagner CA, Klosko SM (1977) Gravitational harmonics from shallow resonant orbits. Celest Mech 16: 143–163
Wagner CA (1989) Satellite Altimetry. In: Sansó F, Rummel R(eds) Theory of Satellite Geodesy and Gravity Field Deter-mination, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 25. Springer, Berlin, pp 285–333
Wagner CA, McAdoo DC, Klokočník J, Kostelecký J (2005) Degradation of Grace Monthly Geopotentials in 2004 Explained. EOS Trans AGU 86(18). J Assem Suppl, Abstract G23B04
Wagner CA, McAdoo D, Klokočník J, Kostelecký J (2006) Degradation of geopotential recovery from short repeat-cycle orbits: application to GRACE monthly fields. J Geod 80: 94–103; doi:10.1007-/s00190-006-0036
Yamamoto K, Otsubo T, Kubooka T, Fukuda Y (2005) A simulation study of effects of GRACE orbit decay on the gravity field recovery. Earth Planets Space 57: 291–295
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klokočník, J., Wagner, C.A., Kostelecký, J. et al. Variations in the accuracy of gravity recovery due to ground track variability: GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE. J Geod 82, 917–927 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0222-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0222-0