Skip to main content
Log in

On the explicit determination of stability constants for linearized geodetic boundary value problems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory of GBVPs provide the basis to the approximate methods used to compute global gravity models. A standard approximation procedure is least squares, which implicitly assumes that data, e.g. gravity disturbance and gravity anomaly, are given functions in L 2(S). We know that solutions in these cases exist, but uniqueness (and coerciveness which implies stability of the numerical solutions) is the real problem. Conditions of uniqueness for the linearized fixed boundary and Molodensky problems are studied in detail. They depend on the geometry of the boundary; however, the case of linearized fixed boundary BVP puts practically no constraint on the surface S, while the linearized Molodensky BVP requires the previous knowledge of very low harmonics, for instance up to degree 25, if we want the telluroid to be free to have inclinations up to 60°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cimmino G (1955) Spazi hilbertiani di funzioni armoniche e questioni connesse. Equazioni lineari alle derivate parziali. Trieste 1954, UMI Roma

  • Heiskenen WA and Moritz H (1967). Physical geodesy. WH Freemann & Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1996) Variational methods for quasigeoid determination. In: Techniques for local geoid determination. In: Proceedings of session G7, EGS XXI general assembly, The Hague, The Netherlands, 6–10 May 1996. Reports of the Finnish geodetic Institute no. 96:2, Masala, 1996, pp 9–21

  • Holota P (1997). Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem and a geometric interpretation. J Geode 71: 640–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hormander L (1976). The boundary problems of physical geodesy. Arch Rat Mec An 62: 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK (1997) Development and applications of geopotential models. Lecture notes of the International Geoid Service, International school for the determination and use of the Geoid. http://www.iges.polimi.it

  • Rozanov Y and Sansó F (2003). The analysis of the Neumann and oblique derivative problem. In: Weaktheory. Grafarend, WE, Krumm, FW and Schwarze, VS (eds) Geodesy: the challenge of the 3rd millennium, pp. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote F and Sansó F (1986). The scalar boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Manusc Geod 11: 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote F, Sansó F (in print). On the universal solvability of classical value problem of potential theory. In: Proccedings of the VI Hotine Marussi symposium, Wuhan 2006, IAG symposia series, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Sansó F and Venuti G (2005). Topological vector spaces of harmonic functions and the trace operator. J Geod 79: 203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson SL (1983). Pseudodifferential operators, a new approach to the boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Manusc Geod 8: 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosida K (1978). Functional analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Venuti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sansò, F., Venuti, G. On the explicit determination of stability constants for linearized geodetic boundary value problems. J Geod 82, 909–916 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0221-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0221-1

Keywords

Navigation