Advertisement

Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 397–401 | Cite as

Forecast Vienna Mapping Functions 1 for real-time analysis of space geodetic observations

  • J. BoehmEmail author
  • J. Kouba
  • H. Schuh
Original Article

Abstract

The Vienna Mapping Functions 1 (VMF1) as provided by the Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG) at the Vienna University of Technology are the most accurate mapping functions for the troposphere delays that are available globally and for the entire history of space geodetic observations. So far, the VMF1 coefficients have been released with a time delay of almost two days; however, many scientific applications require their availability in near real-time, e.g. the Ultra Rapid solutions of the International GNSS Service (IGS) or the analysis of the Intensive sessions of the International VLBI Service (IVS). Here we present coefficients of the VMF1 as well as the hydrostatic and wet zenith delays that have been determined from forecasting data of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and provided on global grids. The comparison with parameters derived from ECMWF analysis data shows that the agreement is at the 1 mm level in terms of station height, and that the differences are larger for the wet mapping functions than for the hydrostatic mapping functions and the hydrostatic zenith delays. These new products (VMF1-FC and hydrostatic zenith delays from forecast data) can be used in real-time analysis of geodetic data without significant loss of accuracy.

Keywords

Troposphere mapping functions Numerical weather prediction ECMWF GNSS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res 111:B02406. doi:  10.1029/2005JB003629
  2. Boehm J, Schuh H (2007) Forecasting data of the troposphere used for IVS Intensive sessions. In: Boehm J, Pany A, Schuh H (eds) Proceedings of the 18th European VLBI for geodesy and astrometry working meeting, 12–13 April 2007, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft Nr. 79, Schriftenreihe der Studienrichtung Vermessung und Geoinformation, Technische Universitaet Wien, pp 153–157. ISSN 1811–8380Google Scholar
  3. Boehm J, Mendes Cerveira PJ, Schuh H, Tregoning P (2007) The impact of mapping functions for the neutral atmosphere based on numerical weather models in GPS data analysis. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) IAG symposium series, vol. 130. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 837–843Google Scholar
  4. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Gendt G (2005) The international GPS service: celebrating the 10th anniversary and looking to the next decade. Adv Space Res 36(3): 320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haas R, Wagner J, Mujunen A, Ritikari J, Müskens A, Dulfer C, Bertarini A (2007) e-VLBI transfer from Onsala and Metsähovi to the Bonn correlator. In: Boehm J, Pany A, Schuh H (eds) Proceedings of the 18th European VLBI for geodesy and astrometry Working meeting, 12–13 April 2007, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft Nr. 79, Schriftenreihe der Studienrichtung Vermessung und Geoinformation, Technische Universitaet Wien, pp 27–32. ISSN 1811–8380Google Scholar
  6. Héroux P, Kouba J (2001) GPS precise point positioning with IGS orbit products. Phys Chem Earth A 26: 573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kouba J (2007) Implementation and testing of the gridded Vienna Mapping Function 1. J Geod. doi:  10.1007/s00190-007-0170-0
  8. Niell AE (2000) Improved atmospheric mapping functions for VLBI and GPS. Earth Planets Space 52: 699–702Google Scholar
  9. Niell AE (2006) Interaction of Atmosphere Modeling and VLBI Analysis Strategy, in International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry 2006 General Meeting Proceedings, edited by Dirk Behrend and Karen Baver, NASA/CP-2006-214140Google Scholar
  10. Tesmer V, Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Effect of different tropospheric mapping functions on the TRF, CRF and position time-series estimated from VLBI. J Geod. doi:  10.1007/s00190-006-0126-9
  11. Tregoning P, Herring TA (2006) Impact of a priori zenith hydrostatic delay errors on GPS estimates of station heights and zenith total delays. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi:  10.1029/2006GL027706

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.Geodetic Survey DivisionNatural Resources CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations