Abstract
A time dependent amplitude model was proposed for the analysis and prediction of polar motion time series. The formulation was implemented to analyze part of the new combined solution, EOP (IERS) C 04, daily polar motion time series of 14 years length using a statistical model with first order autoregressive disturbances. A new solution approach, where the serial correlations of the disturbances are eliminated by sequentially differencing the measurements, was used to estimate the model parameters using weighted least squares. The new model parsimoniously represents the 14-year time series with 0.5 mas rms fit, close to the reported 0.1 mas observed pole position precisions for the x and y components. The model can also predict 6 months into the future with less than 4 mas rms prediction error for both polar motion components, and down to sub mas for one-step ahead prediction as validated using a set of daily time series data that are not used in the estimation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderle RJ (1972) Determination of polar motion from satellite observations. J Surv Geophys 1(2): 147–161
Aoyama Y, Naito I, Iwabuchi T, Yamazaki N (2003) Atmospheric quasi-14 month fluctuation and excitation of the Chandler wobble. E-Letter, Earth Planets Space 55: e25–e28
Burg JP (1975) Maximum entropy spectrum analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University
Chao BF (1972) Autoregressive harmonic analysis of the Earth’s polar motion using homogeneous International Latitude Service data. J Geophys Res 88(B12): 10299–10307
Chao BF (1985) Modeling and forecast of the polar motion excitation functions for short-term polar motion prediction. Bull Geod 59: 81–93
Chin TM, Gross RS, Dickey JO (2004) Modeling and forecast of the polar motion excitation functions for short-term polar motion prediction. J Geod 78: 343–353
Gonella J (1972) A rotary component method for analyzing meteorological and oceanographic vector time series. Deep Sea Res 19: 833–846
Guinot B (1980) Determination of the motion of the pole, and comparison with astrometry. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 294: 329–334
Guinot B (1972) The Chandierian Wobble from 1900 to 1970 Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol 19, 207 pp
Gross RS (2000) The excitation of the Chandler wobble. Geophys Res Lett 27: 2329–2332
Bizouard C, Gambis D (2007) The combined Solution C04 for Earth Orientation Parameters Consistent with International Reference Frame 2005. Document downloaded from IERS, EO Center (http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/)
Brzezinski A, Nastula J, Ponte RM (2002) Oceanic excitation of the Chandler wobble using a 50-year time series of ocean angular momentum. In: Adám J, Schwarz KP (eds) Vistas for geodesy in the new millenium. IAG Symposia, vol. 125. Springer, New York, pp. 434–439
Höpfner J (2004) Low-frequency variations, chandler and annual wobbles of polar motion as observed over one century. Surveys in geophysics. Kluwer, New York, vol. 25, pp 1–54
İz HB, Chen YQ (1999) VLBI rates with first order autoregressive disturbances. J Geodynam 28(2–3): 131–145
İz HB, Shum CK (2000) Mean sea level variation in the South China Sea from four decades of tidal records in Hong Kong. Marine Geod 23(4): 221–233
İz HB, Schaffrin B (2001) The accuracy of earth orientation parameters estimated from VLBI data using variate differencing, Geophysical research abstracts 26th general assembly, vol 3
İz HB (2002) Differential orbit prediction. Abstracts of EGS, XXVII geophysical general assembly. Nice, France
Iz HB (2006) How do Unmodeled Systematic MSL Variations Affect Long Term Sea Level Trend Estimates from Tide Gauge Data?. J Geod 80: 40–46
Jeffreys H (1940) The variation of latitude. Mon Not Roy Astr Soc 100: 139–139
Kosek W (2002) Autocovariance prediction of complex-valued polar motion time series. Adv Space Res 30: 375–380
Rochester MG (1984) Causes of fluctuations in the rotation of the Earth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 313: 95–105
Okubo S (1982) Is the Chandler period variable?. Geophys J R Astron Soc 71: 629–646
Schuh H, Nagel S, Seitz T (2001) Linear drift and periodic variations observed in long term series of polar motion. J Geod 74: 701–710
Pan C (2007) Observed multiple frequencies of the Chandler wobble. J Geodynam 44: 47–65
Proverbio E, Carta F, Mazzoleni F (1971) Analysis of the Chandler period of polar coordinates calculated with Orlov’s method. Pubblicazioni Della Stazione Astronomica Internazionale Di Latitudine Carloforte-Cagliari. Nuova Serie, N. 18
Vicente RO, Wilson CR (2002) On long-period polar motion. J Geod 76: 199–208
Zhu SY (1981) Prediction of earth rotation and polar motion. OSU Report No. 320
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Urho Uotila (1923–2006) whose teaching of “Adjustment Computations” over the years influenced so much, so many of us who had the privilege of being his students.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
İz, H.B. Polar motion modeling, analysis, and prediction with time dependent harmonic coefficients. J Geod 82, 871–881 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0215-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0215-z