Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Meissl scheme for the geodetic ellipsoid

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a variant of the Meissl scheme to relate surface spherical harmonic coefficients of the disturbing potential of the Earth’s gravity field on the surface of the geodetic ellipsoid to surface spherical harmonic coefficients of its first- and second-order normal derivatives on the same or any other ellipsoid. It extends the original (spherical) Meissl scheme, which only holds for harmonic coefficients computed from geodetic data on a sphere. In our scheme, a vector of solid spherical harmonic coefficients of one quantity is transformed into spherical harmonic coefficients of another quantity by pre-multiplication with a transformation matrix. This matrix is diagonal for transformations between spheres, but block-diagonal for transformations involving the ellipsoid. The computation of the transformation matrix involves an inversion if the original coefficients are defined on the ellipsoid. This inversion can be performed accurately and efficiently (i.e., without regularisation) for transformation among different gravity field quantities on the same ellipsoid, due to diagonal dominance of the matrices. However, transformations from the ellipsoid to another surface can only be performed accurately and efficiently for coefficients up to degree and order 520 due to numerical instabilities in the inversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bölling K, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geod 79(6–7): 300–330. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0465-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens SJ (2005) New relations among associated Legendre functions and spherical harmonics. J Geod 79(6–7): 398–406. doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0483-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens SJ (2006) Solutions to ellipsoidal boundary value problems for gravity field modelling, Ph.D. thesis. Department of Spatial Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

  • Claessens SJ, Featherstone WE (2005) Computation of geopotential coefficients from gravity anomalies on the ellipsoid. In: Sansò F (ed). A Window on the future of geodesy. IAG Symposia Series 128, Springer, Berlin, pp 459–464

  • Cruz JY (1986) Ellipsoidal corrections to potential coefficients obtained from gravity anomaly data on the ellipsoid. Report 371, Department of Geodetic Science and Surv, Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Grafarend EW (2001) The spherical horizontal and spherical vertical boundary value problem - vertical deflections and geoidal undulations—the completed Meissl diagram. J Geod 75(7–8): 363–390. doi:10.1007/s001900100186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen W, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. WH Freeman & Co,

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions. J Geod 76(5): 279–299. doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0216-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C (1981) The downward continuation to the Earth’s surface of truncated spherical and ellipsoidal harmonic series of the gravity and height anomalies. Report 323, Department of Geodetic Science and Surv, Ohio State Univ, Columbus

  • Jekeli C (1988) The exact transformation between ellipsoidal and spherical harmonic expansions.. Manuscr Geod 13(2): 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C, Lee J, Kwon J (2007) On the computation and approximation of ultra-high-degree spherical harmonic series. J Geod 81(9): 603–615. doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0123-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller W (2002) Geodetic pseudodifferential operator and the Meissl scheme. In: Grafarend EW, Krumm FW, Schwarze VS(eds) Geodesy—the Challenge of the third millennium. Springer, Berlin, pp 206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Featherstone WE (2005) On the optimal spatial resolution of crustal mass distributions for forward gravity modelling. In: Tziavos IN(eds) Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the international gravity and geoid commission: gravity and geoid 2002. Ziti eds., Thessaloniki, pp 189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissl P (1971) On the linearization of the geodetic boundary value problem, Report 151, Department of Geodetic Science and Surv, Ohio State University Columbus

  • Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Wichmann, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz H (1980) Geodetic reference system 1980. Bull Géod 54(4): 395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Factor JK, Holmes SA (2007) Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM. In: Kiliçoǧlu A, Forsberg R (eds). Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium of the International Gravity Field Service: Gravity Field of the Earth. General Command of Mapping, Ankara, pp 318–323

  • Petrovskaya MS, Vershkov AN, Pavlis NK (2001) New analytical and numerical approaches for geopotential modelling. J Geod 75(12): 661–672. doi:10.1007/s001900100215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protter MH, Morrey CB (1964) Modern mathematical analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Rózsa S, Tóth G (2005) Prediction of vertical gravity gradients using gravity and elevation data. In: Sansò F (ed) A Window on the Future of Geodesy. IAG symposia series 128, Springer, pp 344–349

  • Rummel R, Van Gelderen M (1992) Spectral analysis of the full gravity tensor. Geophys J Int 111(1): 159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel R, Van Gelderen M (1995) Meissl scheme–spectral characteristics of physical geodesy. Manuscr Geod 20(5): 379–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg LE (2003) The ellipsoidal corrections to order e 2 of geopotential coefficients and Stokes’ formula. J Geod 77(3–4): 139–147. doi:10.1007/s001900-003-0321-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sona G (1995) Numerical problems in the computation of ellipsoidal harmonics. J Geod 70(1–2): 117–126. doi:10.1007/BF00863423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang G (1986) Linear algebra and its applications (3rd edn). Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer T, Klees R, Seitz K, Heck B (2007) Ultra-high degree spherical harmonic analysis and synthesis using extended-range arithmetic. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0172-y (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Western Australian Centre for Geodesy and The Institute for Geoscience Research, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia

    S. J. Claessens & W. E. Featherstone

Authors
  1. S. J. Claessens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. E. Featherstone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Claessens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claessens, S.J., Featherstone, W.E. The Meissl scheme for the geodetic ellipsoid. J Geod 82, 513–522 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0200-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0200-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation