Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of long-range kinematic GPS positioning errors by comparison with airborne laser altimetry and satellite altimetry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-range airborne laser altimetry and laser scanning (LIDAR) or airborne gravity surveys in, for example, polar or oceanic areas require airborne kinematic GPS baselines of many hundreds of kilometers in length. In such instances, with the complications of ionospheric biases, it can be a real challenge for traditional differential kinematic GPS software to obtain reasonable solutions. In this paper, we will describe attempts to validate an implementation of the precise point positioning (PPP) technique on an aircraft without the use of a local GPS reference station. We will compare PPP solutions with other conventional GPS solutions, as well as with independent data by comparison of airborne laser data with “ground truth” heights. The comparisons involve two flights: A July 5, 2003, airborne laser flight line across the North Atlantic from Iceland to Scotland, and a May 24, 2004, flight in an area of the Arctic Ocean north of Greenland, near-coincident in time and space with the ICESat satellite laser altimeter. Both of these flights were more than 800 km long. Comparisons between different GPS methods and four different software packages do not suggest a clear preference for any one, with the heights generally showing decimeter-level agreement. For the comparison with the independent ICESat- and LIDAR-derived “ground truth” of ocean or sea-ice heights, the statistics of comparison show a typical fit of around 10 cm RMS in the North Atlantic, and 30 cm in the sea-ice region north of Greenland. Part of the latter 30 cm error is likely due to errors in the airborne LIDAR measurement and calibration, as well as errors in the “ground truth” ocean surfaces due to drifting sea-ice. Nevertheless, the potential of the PPP method for generating 10 cm level kinematic height positioning over long baselines is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth Science Applications. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214, DOI 10.1029/2001JB000561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen P (1998) Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and GEOSAT geodetic mission altimetry. J Geophys Res 103(C4):8129–8137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisnath SN, Beran T, Langley RB (2002) Precise platform positioning with a single GPS receiver. GPS World 13(4):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt G (1990) An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 17(3):199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon ME, Schwarz KP, Wei M (1992) A consistency test of airborne GPS using multiple monitor stations. Bull Géod 66(1):2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo OL, Evans AG (1998) Testing decimeter-level, kinematic, differential GPS over great distances at sea and on land. In: Proceedings of ION GPS-1998, Nashville, 15–18 September, pp 1257–1264

  • Castleden N, Hu GR, Abbey DA, Weihing D, Ovstedal O, Earls CJ, Featherstone WE (2005) First results from virtual reference station (VRS) and precise point positioning (PPP) GPS research at the Western Australian Centre for Geodesy. J GPS 3(1–2):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalå NS, Forsberg R, Keller K, Skourup H, Stenseng L, Hvidegaard SM (2005) Airborne lidar measurements of sea ice north of Greenland and Ellesmere Island 2004. In: Technical Report 3, Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen

  • Eanes RJ, Bettadpur SV (1996) The CSR 3.0 global ocean tide model: diurnal and semidiurnal ocean tides from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry. In: Technical Report CSR-TM-96-05, Center for Space Research, University of Texas, Austin

  • Forsberg R, Keller K, Jacobsen SM (2001a) Laser monitoring of ice elevations and sea-ice thickness in Greenland. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spat Inf Syst XXXIV(3/W4):163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Olesen AV, Keller K (2001b) Airborne gravity survey of the North Greenland continental shelf. In: Sideris MG (ed) Gravity, geoid and geodynamics 2000, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 123, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 235–240

  • Forsberg R, Olesen AV, Vest A, Solheim D, Hipkin R, Omang O, Knudsen P (2004) Gravity field improvements in the North Atlantic Region. In: Proceedings of GOCE Workshop, ESA-ESRIN

  • Forsberg R, Skourup H (2005) Arctic Ocean gravity, geoid and sea-ice freeboard heights from ICESat and GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 32: L21502. DOI 10.1029/2005GL023711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Shen X (2001) Improving ambiguity convergence in carrier phase-based precise point positioning. In: Proceedings of ION GPS-2001, 11–14 September, Salt Lake City, pp 1532–1539

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP, Rothacher M (2006) A new data processing strategy for huge GNSS global networks. J Geod 80. DOI 10.1007/s00190-006-0044-x

  • Han S (1997) Carrier phase-based long-range GPS kinematic positioning. PhD thesis, School of Geomatic Engineering, The University of New South Wales

  • Han S, Rizos C (1999) Sea surface determination using long-range kinematic GPS positioning and laser airborne depth sounder techniques. Mar Geod 22(2):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvidegaard SM, Forsberg R (2002) Sea-ice thickness from airborne laser altimetry over the Arctic Ocean north of Greenland. Geophys Res Lett 29(20):1952–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DD (ed) (1989) IERS standards, technical note 3. International Earth Rotation and Reference Frames Service Central Bureau, Observatoire du Paris

  • McCarthy DD (ed) (1996). IERS conventions, technical note 21. International Earth Rotation and Reference Frames Service Central Bureau, Observatoire du Paris

  • Kouba J, Heroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa MR (2005) Precise airborne GPS positioning alternatives for the aerial mapping practice. In: Proceedings of FIG working week 2005 and GSDI-8, Cairo, 16–21 April 2005

  • Muellerschoen RJ, Bertiger WI, Lough MF (2000) Results of an internet-based dual-frequency global differential GPS system. In: Proceedings of IAIN World Congress, San Diego

  • Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. In: The use of artificial satellites in geodesy (Geophysics Monogr. Ser.), American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 247–251

  • Schutz BE (2002) Laser footprint location (geolocation) and surface profiles, In: Geoscience laser altimeter system (GLAS): algorithm theoretical basis document version 3.0

  • Zhang X, Andersen OB (2006) Surface ice flow velocity and tide retrieval of the Amery Ice Shelf using precise point positioning. J Geod 80. DOI 10.1007/s00190-006-0062-8

  • Zhang X (2005) Precise point positioning evaluation and airborne LIDAR calibration. In: Technical Report 4, Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen

  • Zumberge J, Heflin M, Jefferson D, Watkins M, Webb F (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102:5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwally J, Schutz B, Abdalati W, Abshirea J, Bentley C, Brenner A, Bufton J, Dezio J, Hancock D, Harding D, Herring T, Minster B, Quinn K, Palm S, Spinhirne J, Thomas R (2002) ICESat’s laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land. J Geodyn 34:405–445

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Forsberg, R. Assessment of long-range kinematic GPS positioning errors by comparison with airborne laser altimetry and satellite altimetry. J Geod 81, 201–211 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0100-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0100-6

Keywords

Navigation