Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS

Abstract

The Global Positioning System (GPS) has become a powerful tool for ionospheric studies. In addition, ionospheric corrections are necessary for the augmentation systems required for Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) use. Dual-frequency carrier-phase and code-delay GPS observations are combined to obtain ionospheric observables related to the slant total electron content (sTEC) along the satellite-receiver line-of-sight (LoS). This observable is affected by inter-frequency biases [IFB; often called differential code biases (DCB)] due to the transmitting and the receiving hardware. These biases must be estimated and eliminated from the data in order to calibrate the experimental sTEC obtained from GPS observations. Based on the analysis of single differences of the ionospheric observations obtained from pairs of co-located dual-frequency GPS receivers, this research addresses two major issues: (1) assessing the errors translated from the code-delay to the carrier-phase ionospheric observable by the so-called levelling process, applied to reduce carrier-phase ambiguities from the data; and (2) assessing the short-term stability of receiver IFB. The conclusions achieved are: (1) the levelled carrier-phase ionospheric observable is affected by a systematic error, produced by code-delay multi-path through the levelling procedure; and (2) receiver IFB may experience significant changes during 1 day. The magnitude of both effects depends on the receiver/antenna configuration. Levelling errors found in this research vary from 1.4 total electron content units (TECU) to 5.3 TECU. In addition, intra-day vaiations of code-delay receiver IFB ranging from 1.4 to 8.8 TECU were detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Azpilicueta F, Brunini C, Radicella SM (2005) Global ionospheric maps from GPS observations using modip latitude. Adv Space Res JARS 7882:8. DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.069 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassiri S, Hajj A (1992) Higher order ionospheric effects on the Global Positioning System observables and means of modelling them. manuscripta geodaetica 18:280–290

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beutler G, Rotacher M, Schaer, Springer TA, Kouba J, Neilan RE (1999) The International GPS Service (IGS): an interdisciplinary service in support of Earth sciences. Adv Space Res 23(4):631–653. DOI 10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00160-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop G, Walsh D, Daly P, Mazzella A, Holland E (1994) Analysis of the temporal stability of GPS and GLONASS group delay correction terms seen in various sets of ionospheric delay data. In: Proceedings of the ION GPS-94, Salt Lake City, pp 1653–1661

  5. Blewitt G (1990) An automatic editing algorithm for GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 17(3):199–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braasch M (1996) Multi-path effects. In: Parkinson BW Spilker JJ (eds) Global Positioning System: theory and applications, vol 1. Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 547–568

  7. Brunini C (1998) Global Ionospheric model from GPS measurements. PhD thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata

  8. Brunini C, van Zele MA, Meza A, Gende M (2003) Quiet and perturbed ionospheric representation according to the electron content from GPS signals. J Geophys Res 108:SIA4-1. CiteID 1056. DOI A2 10.1029/2002JA009346

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brunini C, Meza A, Azpilicueta F, van Zele A, Gende M, Diaz A (2004) A new ionosphere monitoring technology based on GPS. Astrophys Space Sci 290:415–429. DOI 10.1023/B:ASTR.0000032540.35594.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunini C, Meza A, Bosch W (2005) Temporal and spatial variability of the bias between TOPEX- and GPS-derived total electron content. J Geod 79. DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0448-z

  11. Brunner FK, Gu M (1991) An improved model for the dual frequency ionospheric correction of GPS observations. manuscripta geodaetica 16:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Byun SH, Hajj GA, Young LE (2002) Development and application of GPS signal multi-path simulator. Radio Sci 37(6):1098. DOI 10.1029/2001RS002549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies K, Hartmann GK (1997) Studying the ionosphere with the Global Positioning System. Radio Sci 32(4):1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feltens J (1998) Chapman Profile Approach for 3-D Global TEC representation. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IGS Analysis Centres Workshop, Darmstadt, pp 285–297

  15. Gao Y, Heroux P, Kouba J (1994) Estimation of GPS receiver and satellite L1/L2 signal delay biases using data from CACS. In: Proceedings of the KIS-94, Banff, pp 109–117

  16. Gao Y, Lahaye F, Héroux P, Liao X, Beck N, Olynik M (2001) Modeling and estimation of C1-P1 bias in GPS receivers. J Geod 74(9):621–626. DOI 10.1007/s001900000117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaposchkin EM, Coster AJ (1993) GPS L1–L2 bias determination. Lincoln Laboratory Technical Report 971 (MIT), Massachusetts

  18. Hernandez-Pajares M (2004) IGS Ionosphere WG: an overview. In: Proceedings of the COST 2004, Nice, pp 29–29

  19. Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J (1999) New approaches in global ionospheric determination using ground GPS data. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 61:1237–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jakowsky N, Sardon E, Egler E, Jungstand A, Klahn D (1996) About the use of GPS measurements for ionospheric studies. In: Beutler G, Hein GW, Melbourne WG, Seebr G (eds) GPS trends in precise terrestrial airborne and spaceborne applications. IAG Symposium vol 115. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 335–340

  21. Langley R (1996) Propagation of the GPS signals. In: Kleusberg A, Teunissen P (eds) GPS for geodesy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 103–140. ISBN 3-540-60785-4

  22. Lanyi GE, Roth T (1988) A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using Global Positioning System and beacon satellite observations. Radio Sci 23:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leitinger R, Putz E (1988) Ionospheric refraction errors and observables. Atmospheric effects on geodetic space measurements. Monograph 12, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, Sydney, pp 81–102

  24. Ma XF, Maruyama T, Ma G (2005) Determination of GPS receiver differential biases by neuronal network parameter estimation method. Radio Sci 40:RS1002. DOI 10.1029/2004RS003072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mannucci AJ, Wilson BD, Yuan DN, Ho CH, Lindqwister UJ, Runge TF (1998) A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Sci 33:565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Otsuka Y, Ogawa T, Saito A, Tsugawa T, Fukao S, Miyasaky S (2002) A new method for mapping of total electron content using GPS in Japan. Earth Planets Space 54:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sardon E, Zarraoa N (1997) Estimation of total electron-content using GPS data: how stable are the differential satellite and receiver instrumental biases? Radio Sci 32:1899–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sardon E, Rius A, Zarraoa N (1994) Estimation of the transmitter and receiver differential biases and the ionospheric total electron content from Global Positioning System observations. Radio Sci 29:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. PhD thesis, Astronomisches Institut, Universität Bern, Switzerland

  30. Walter T, Blanch J, Rife J (2004) Treatment of biased error distributions in SBAS. J Global Position Syst 3(1–2):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Azpilicueta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ciraolo, L., Azpilicueta, F., Brunini, C. et al. Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS. J Geod 81, 111–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0093-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Total electron content (TEC)
  • GPS, Inter-frequency bias
  • Differential code bias (DCB)
  • Levelling carrier to code TEC