Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp 248–258 | Cite as

Determination of Postglacial Land Uplift in Fennoscandia from Leveling, Tide-gauges and Continuous GPS Stations using Least Squares Collocation

Original Article

Abstract

Precise leveling, tide-gauge recordings and time series from continuous GPS stations are all sources of information about the ongoing postglacial land uplift in Fennoscandia. This article describes how to gather these three sources of data together in a least-squares collocation adjustment in order to calculate uplift rates, as well as new heights for the benchmarks in the leveling network. The estimated reliability of the resulting uplift model is in general better than 0.4 mm/year, decreasing in areas of fewer data.

Keywords

Postglacial land uplift Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) Least-squares collocation (LSC) Precise leveling tide-gauges Continuous GPS (cGPS) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caspary WF (1988) Concepts of network and deformation analysis. Monograph 11, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. Danielsen J (1999) Determination of land uplift in areas not covered by repeated leveling. Licentiate thesis. Report no. 1052. Division of Geodesy. Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  3. Danielsen J (2001) A land uplift map of Fennoscandia. Surv Rev 36(282): 282–291Google Scholar
  4. Ekman M (1988) The world’s longest continued series of sea level observations. Pure Appl Geophys 127:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ekman M (1996) A consistent map of the postglacial uplift of Fennoscandia. Terra Nova 8:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekman M, Mäkinen J (1996) Recent postglacial rebound, gravity change and mantle flow in Fennoscandia. Geophys J Int 126:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. King RW, Bock Y (1999) Documentation for the GAMIT GPS analysis software. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/~simon/gtgk/Google Scholar
  8. Lidberg M (2004) Motions in the geodetic reference frame. Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, OnsalaGoogle Scholar
  9. Lambeck K, Smither C, Ekman M (1998): Tests of glacial rebound models for Fennoscandinavia based on instrumented sea- and lake-level records. Geophys J Int 135:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pelzer H (1985) Geodätische Netze in Landes- und Ingenieurvermessung II. Chapter 2: Überfürung von AusgleichungsmodellenGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwarz KP (1976) Least squares collocation for large systems. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini 35(3):309–324Google Scholar
  12. Williams SDP (2003) The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series. J Geod 76(9–10):483–494 DOI 10.1007/s00190–002–0283-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Mapping AuthoritiesHønefossNorway

Personalised recommendations