Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the SRTM global DEM on the determination of a high-resolution geoid model: a case study in Iran

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Any errors in digital elevation models (DEMs) will introduce errors directly in gravity anomalies and geoid models when used in interpolating Bouguer gravity anomalies. Errors are also propagated into the geoid model by the topographic and downward continuation (DWC) corrections in the application of Stokes’s formula. The effects of these errors are assessed by the evaluation of the absolute accuracy of nine independent DEMs for the Iran region. It is shown that the improvement in using the high-resolution Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data versus previously available DEMs in gridding of gravity anomalies, terrain corrections and DWC effects for the geoid model are significant. Based on the Iranian GPS/levelling network data, we estimate the absolute vertical accuracy of the SRTM in Iran to be 6.5 m, which is much better than the estimated global accuracy of the SRTM (say 16 m). Hence, this DEM has a comparable accuracy to a current photogrammetric high-resolution DEM of Iran under development. We also found very large differences between the GLOBE and SRTM models on the range of −750 to 550 m. This difference causes an error in the range of −160 to 140 mGal in interpolating surface gravity anomalies and −60 to 60 mGal in simple Bouguer anomaly correction terms. In the view of geoid heights, we found large differences between the use of GLOBE and SRTM DEMs, in the range of −1.1 to 1 m for the study area. The terrain correction of the geoid model at selected GPS/levelling points only differs by 3 cm for these two DEMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbolgasem A (1994) Iranian sea surface topography. MSc Thesis, K.N. Toosi University, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren J (2004) Regional geoid determination methods for the era of satellite gravimetry. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardalan AA, Grafarend EW (2004) High resolution geoid computation without applying Stokes’s formula case study: high resolution geoid of Iran. J Geod 78:138–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R (1985) Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT. Bull Geod 59:342–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos G, Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (2003) How accurately can we determine orthometric height differences from GPS and geoid data? Simulated case studies in Western Canada. J Surv Eng 129(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamesh M (1991) Technical report about adjustment of Iranian first order levelling network, National Cartographic Centre of Iran. J Surveying 1:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamesh M, Zomorrodian H (1992) Iranian gravimetric geoid determination second step, National Cartographic Centre of Iran. J Surv 6:17–24, 52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings DA, Dunbar PK (1999) Global land one-kilometer base elevation (GLOBE): NGDC key to geophysical records documentation No 34. National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton RD, Featherstone WE, Berry PAM, Johnson CPD, Kirby JF (2003) Comparison of digital elevation models over Australia and external validation using ERS-1 satellite radar altimetry. Aust J Earth Sci 50:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiamehr R, Sjöberg LE (2005) The qualities of Iranian gravimetric geoid models versus recent gravity field missions. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 49:289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiamehr R (2005) Qualification and refinement of the Iranian gravity database. In: Proceedings of the National Cartographic Center of Iran Geomatics 84 Conferences, Tehran

  • Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (1999) On the adjustment of combined GPS/levelling/geoid networks. J Geod 73(8):412–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96, NASA/TP-1998–206861. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry CL (2003) DEM-induced errors in developing a quasi-geoid model for Africa. J Geod 77:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi M (2004) New Iranian geoid model using Stokes-Helmert approach. Tech report. National Cartographic Centre of Iran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC, Knudsen P, Forsberg R (1994) Description of the GRAVSOFT package. Geophysical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Technical report, 1991, 2nd edn, 1992, 3rd edn, 1993, 4th edn

  • Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 102(B5):10039–10054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg LE (1991) Refined least squares modification of Stokes’s formula. Manuscr Geod 16:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg LE (2003) A computational scheme to model the geoid by the modified Stokes formula without gravity reductions. J Geod 77:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Geological Survey (1997) GTOPO30 digital elevation model. US Geological Survey

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kiamehr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiamehr, R., Sjöberg, L.E. Effect of the SRTM global DEM on the determination of a high-resolution geoid model: a case study in Iran. J Geodesy 79, 540–551 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0006-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0006-8

Keywords

Navigation