Relationship of corporate social responsibility disclosure on information asymmetry and the cost of capital
- 1.2k Downloads
Different from the strong evidence in the literature that voluntary disclosure in general and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in particular is associated with corporate financial performance results for the association of CSR disclosure and firmlevel cost of capital are not fully convincing. We argue that contradictory findings result from research design limitations and revisit the relationship, hence. Predicting a negative relationship between CSR disclosure and information asymmetry as well as for CSR disclosure and cost of capital, we examine our hypotheses based on a sample of 264 German companies that provide English language CSR reporting along with current stock prices and analyst forecast data. We use artificial intelligence based content analysis to measure CSR disclosure. We proxy for information asymmetry with bid–ask spreads and calculate an implied cost of capital measure. Results reveal that CSR disclosure is significantly negatively associated with information asymmetry as well as cost of capital. Our paper contributes to the existing literature as this is the first study to examine capital cost effects of comprehensive CSR disclosure using nonsubjective measures in the German setting that is known to have an extraordinary rich CSR disclosure and long experience in CSR and CSR disclosure.
KeywordsCSR Voluntary disclosure Information asymmetry Cost of capital Content analysis
- Archer, D. (2009). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72, 323–349.Google Scholar
- Choe, H., & Yang, C. (2006). Comparisons of information asymmetry measures in the Korean stock market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 35, 1–44.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. B. (Ed.). (1974). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Deutsche Börse AG. (2015). Vom Parkett zum elektronischen Handelsplatz. https://deutsche-boerse.com/dbg/dispatch/de/binary/gdb_content_pool/imported_files/public_files/10_downloads/11_about_us/DB_DBG_P_z_v_HP.pdf. Accessed April 13 2016.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33, 328–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elliott, R. K., & Jacobson, P. D. (1994). Costs and benefits of business information disclosure. Accounting Horizons, 8, 80–96.Google Scholar
- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (1993). The Effect of Firms’ Financial Disclosure Strategies on Stock Prices. Accounting Horizons, 7, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Hussain, S. M. (2011). The intraday behaviour of bid–ask spreads, trading volume and return volatility? Evidence from DAX30. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3, 23–34.Google Scholar
- O’Hara, M. (1998). Market microstructure theory. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Schröder, D. (2007). The implied equity risk premium—An evaluation of empirical methods. Kredit und Kap, 40, 583–613.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. (2012). Hidden Champions - Aufbruch nach Globalia: Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
- Stoll, H. R. (2003). Market Microstructure. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (pp. 553–604). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Sustainalytics. (2012). Die Nachhaltigkeitsleistungen deutscher Großunternehmen. http://www.sustainalytics.com/sites/default/files/sustainalytics_dax_30_studie_2011_0.pdf. Accessed March 15 2015.
- Verousis, T. (2013). Bid–ask spreads, commissions, and other costs. In K. H. Baker & H. Kiymaz (Eds.), Market microstructure in emerging and developed markets (pp. 327–343). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar