Journal of Management Control

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 81–117 | Cite as

Audit committee composition and effectiveness: a review of post-SOX literature

  • Mahfuja MalikEmail author
Original Paper


The Sarbanes–Oxley act (SOX) was enacted to strengthen corporate governance practices in the United States; since SOX enactment, the audit committee has received increasing emphasis in accounting research. The main objective of this study is to review and synthesize the growing volume of audit committee literature in the post-SOX era. While summarizing the post-SOX literature, this study also focuses on selected pre-SOX studies to compare the research issues and findings of pre- and post-SOX literature and to show how governance reforms shape the literature’s domain. The extant audit committee literature reflects an enormous body of knowledge. Pre-SOX literature documents that audit the committee composition criteria play a significant role in determining the effectiveness of the audit committee. Like the pre-SOX literature, post-SOX literature establishes the notion that independent and expert audit committees enhance the effectiveness of the audit committee monitoring processes and improve the overall quality of financial reporting and auditing. These findings supplement the scholarly support for SOX requirements. In the post-SOX era, researchers have focused on those issues driven by SOX. However, other issues that are not addressed by SOX have also emerged during the post-SOX period, including audit committee compensation and the social ties of committee members with the chief executive officer as well as the supervisory or other expertise of audit committee members. However, for some issue, the findings are not conclusive. For example, post-SOX researchers have documented inconsistent findings regarding the association between the audit committee monitoring process and the different forms of compensation for audit committee members. Moreover, both the pre- and post-SOX literature contain predominantly experimental research. So, there remains ample room for future empirical research that can shed further light on the more theoretical issues. Future researchers can investigate unanswered questions by establishing an implicit understanding of existing findings and developing theories in this area.


Audit committee composition Audit committee effectiveness Sarbanes-Oxley Act 


  1. Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(Fall), 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(Summer), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Rama, D. V. (2007). Corporate governance, audit quality, and the Sarbanes–Oxley act: evidence from internal audit outsourcing. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 803–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2004), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archambeault, D., & DeZoort, F. T. (2001). Auditor opinion shopping and the audit committee: an analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archambeault, D. S., DeZoort, E. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2008). Audit committee incentive compensation and accounting restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 965–992. (Winter 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baura, A., Rama, D. V., & Sharma, V. (2010). Audit committee characteristics and investment in internal auditing. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29, 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beasley, M., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons (December), 14, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beasley, M. S., & Salterio, S. (2001). The relation between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and member experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beasley, M. J., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D., & Neal, T. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring), 26(1), 65–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bédard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive eamings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bierstaker, J. L., Cohen, J. R., DeZoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2012). Audit committee compensation, fairness and the resolution of accounting disagreements. Auditing, 31(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonner, A. (2006). The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bronson, S. N., Carcello, J. V., Hollingsworth, C. W., & Neal, T. L. (2009). Are fully independent audit committees really necessary? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(2009), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Wright, A. M. (2011). The effect of past client relationship and strength of the audit committee on auditor negotiations. Auditing, 30(4), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carcello, J., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going concern reports. The Accounting Review (January), 78(1), 95–117.Google Scholar
  18. Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2002). Disclosures in audit committee charters and reports. Accounting Horizons, 16(4), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caskey, J., Nagar, V., & Petacci, P. (2010). Reporting bias with an audit committee. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 447–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, J., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2010a). The association between audit committee industry expertise and financial restatements. Working paper. Boston College.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research (Winter), 19, 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2010b). Corporate governance in the post Sarbanes–Oxley era: auditors’ experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3 Fall), 751–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen, J., Gaynor, L. M., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2011). The impact on auditor judgments of CEO influence on audit committee independence and management incentives. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(4), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Committee, Blue Ribbon on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. (1999). Report and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. New York: New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers.Google Scholar
  26. Davidson, W. N., Xie, B., & Xu, W. (2004). Market reaction to voluntary announcements of audit committee appointments: the effect of financial expertise. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(2004), 279–293.Google Scholar
  27. DeFond, M., Hann, R., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of board of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dey, A., & Liu, X. (2010). Social connections, stock-based compensation and director oversight. Working paper. University of Chicago Booth School of Business 78(1), 95–117.Google Scholar
  29. Dey, A. (2008). Corporate governance and agency conflicts. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1143–1181.Google Scholar
  30. DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(2), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., & Houston, R. W. (2003). Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: a source credibility perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., & Houston, R. W. (2008). Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: pre-SOX versus post-SOX judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dhaliwal, D. S., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Engel, E., Hayes, R. M., & Wang, X. (2010). Audit committee compensation and the demand for monitoring of the financial reporting process. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1—-2), 136–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review, 80(2), 441–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaynor, L. M., McDaniel, L. S., & Neal, T. L. (2006). The effects of joint provision and disclosure of non-audit services on audit committee members’ decisions and investors’ preference. The Accounting Review, 81(4), 873–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gendron, Y., Bédard, J., & Gosselin, M. (2004). Getting inside the black box: a field study of practices in “effective” audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gendron, Y., & Bédard, J. (2006). On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goh, B. W. (2009). Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 549–579. (summer 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goodwin, J. (2003). The relationship between the audit committee and the internal audit function: evidence from Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Auditing, 7, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoitash, U., Hoitash, R., & Bedard, J. C. (2009). Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: a comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 839–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunton, J. E., & Rose, J. M. (2008). Can directors’ self-interests influence accounting choices? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2008), 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnstone, K., Li, C., & Rupley, K. H. (2011). Changes in corporate governance associated with the revelation of internal control material weaknesses and their subsequent remediation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 331–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karamanou, I., & Vafea, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit committee and management earnings forecasts: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelton, A. S., & Yang, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(2008), 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee financial expertise and internal control: an empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–857. (Fall 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krishnan, J., & Lee, J. E. (2009). Audit committee financial expertise, litigation risk and corporate governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(1), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laux, C., & Laux, V. (2009). Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 869–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, H. Y., Mande, V., & Ortman, R. (2004). The effect of audit committee and board of director independence on auditor resignation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MacGregor, J. (2012). Audit committee equity holdings, the risk of reporting problems and the achievement of earnings thresholds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(5), 471–491.Google Scholar
  53. Magilke, M. J., Mayhew, B. W., & Pike, J. E. (2009). Are independent audit committee members objective? Experimental Evidence. The Accounting Review, 84(6), 1959–1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mayhew, B. W., Schatzberg, J., & Sevcik, G. (2001). The effect of accounting uncertainty and auditor reputationon auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayhew, B. W., & Pike, J. (2004). Does investor selection of auditors enhance auditor independence? The Accounting Review, 79(3), 797–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McDaniel, L., Martin, R. D., & Maines, L. A. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: the effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMullen, D., & Raghunandan, K. (1996). Enhancing audit committee effectiveness. Journal of Accountancy, 182(2), 79–81.Google Scholar
  58. Naiker, V., & Sharma, D. S. (2009). Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 559–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ng, T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors’ judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 801–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Norman, C. S., Rose, A. M., & Suh, J. M. (2011). The effects of disclosure type and audit committee expertise on chief audit executives’ tolerance for financial misstatements. Accounting, Organization and Society, 35, 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pomeroy, B. (2010). Audit committee investigation of significant accounting decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(1), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raghunandan, K., Read, W., & Rama, D. (2001). Audit committee composition, “gray directors”, and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2003). Audit committee composition and shareholder actions: evidence from voting on auditor ratification. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(2), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ronen, J., & Berman, A. (2004). Musings on post-enron reforms. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 19(3), 331–342.Google Scholar
  65. Schondube-Pirchegger, B., & Schondube, J. R. (2011). Reputation concerns and herd behavior of audit committees: a corporate governance problem. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Securities and Exchange Commission. (1999b). Final rule: audit committee disclosure. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. Srinivasan, S. (2005). Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vafeas, N. (2001). On audit committee appointments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(1), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vafeas, N. (2005). Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1093–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vermeer, T. E., Raghunandan, K., & Forgione, D. A. (2009). Audit fees at US non-profit organizations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 300–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations