Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling issues for risky asset modelling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate scaling properties of risky asset returns and make a strong case (1) against the need for multifractal models and (2) in favor of the requirement of heavy tailed distributions. Amongst the standard empirical properties of risky asset returns are an autocorrelation function for the returns which dies away rapidly and is statistically insignificant beyond a few lags, and also autocorrelation functions of squares and absolute values of returns which die away very slowly, persisting over years, or even decades. Together these indicate that, assuming returns come from a stationary process, they are not independent, but at most short-range dependent, while various functions of the returns are long-range dependent. These scaling properties are well known, although commonly ignored for modeling convenience. However, much more can be inferred from the scaling properties of the returns. It turns out that the empirical scaling functions are initially linear and ultimately concave, which is strongly suggestive of returns distributions with infinite low order moments or alternatively that multifractal behavior is a modeling requirement. Modifications of the commonly used models cannot readily meet these requirements. The evidence will be presented and its significance discussed, along with a class of models which can incorporate the empirically observed features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fisher A, Calvet L, Mandelbrot B (1997) Multifractality of the Deutchmark/US Dollar exchange rates. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1165

  • Gencay R, Dacarogna M, Muller U, Pictet O (2001) An introduction to high-frequency finance. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC (1999) A risky asset model with strong dependence through fractal activity time. J Appl Prob 36: 1234–1239

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC (2002) On modes of long-range dependence. J Appl Prob 39: 882–888

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC, Kou SG (2004) On the controversy over tailweight of distributions. Oper Res Lett 32: 399–408

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC, Leonenko N (2005) Student processes. Adv Appl Prob 37: 342–365

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC, Liu S (2001) Empirical realities for a minimal description risky asset model The need for fractal features. J Korean Math Soc 38: 1047–1059

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde CC, Sly A (2007) Scaling properties of risky asset returns and their modelling implications. Manuscript in preparation

  • Mandelbrot B (2001) Scaling in financial prices: I Tails and dependence, II Multifractals and the star equation, III Cartoons of Brownian motion in multifractal time, IV Multifractal concentration. Quantitative Finance, 1:113–123 (I), 124–130 (II), 427–440 (III), 641–649 (IV)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B, Fisher A, Calvet L (1997) A multifractal model of asset returns. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1164

  • Rachev S, Mittnik S (2000) Stable Paretian models in finance. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sly A (2005) Self-similarity, multifractionality and multifractality. MPhil Thesis, Australian National University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris C. Heyde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyde, C.C. Scaling issues for risky asset modelling. Math Meth Oper Res 69, 593–603 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0253-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0253-6

Keywords

Navigation