Advertisement

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 579–592 | Cite as

Stochastic models for bidding strategies on oligopoly electricity market

  • Magdalena Borgosz-Koczwara
  • Aleksander Weron
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper we consider the forward/futures contracts and Asian-type call options for power delivery as important components of the bidding strategies of the players’ profits on the electricity market. We show how these derivatives can affect their profit. We use linear asymmetric supply function equilibrium (SFE) and Cournot models to develop firms’ optimal bidding strategies by including forward/futures contracts and Asian-type options. We extend the methodology proposed by Niu et al. (IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):1859–1867, 2005), where only forward contracts for power delivery were considered in the SFE model.

Keywords

Power market Bidding strategy Supply function equilibrium model Cournot model Forward/futures contract Asian-type call option 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J Regul Econ 25(2): 143–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgosz-Koczwara M, Wyłomańska A (2004) The equilibrium models in oligopoly electricity market. In: International Conference “The European Electricity Market EEM-04”. pp 67–75Google Scholar
  3. Borgosz-Koczwara M, Wyłomańska A (2007) Financial engineering as a tool of power producers’ strategies optimization. In: International Conference “The European Electricity Market EEM-07”. pp 159–165Google Scholar
  4. Chen H, Wong KP, Chung CY, Nguyen DHM (2006) A coevolutionary approach to analyzing supply function equilibrium model. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3): 1019–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geman H (2005) Commodities and Commodity Derivatives. Modelling and Pricing for Agriculturals. Metals and Energy. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Green R (1999) The electricity contract market in England and Wales. J Ind Econ 47(1): 107–123Google Scholar
  7. Klemperer PD, Meyer MA (1989) Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica 57(6): 1243–1277zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Niu H, Baldick R, Zhu G (2005) Supply function equilibrium bidding strategies with fixed forward contracts. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4): 1859–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Renisch W, Tezuka T (2006) Market power and trading strategies on the electricity market: a market design view, IEEE Trans. Power Syst 21(3): 1180–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sapio S (2007) Day-ahead power market volatility in linear SFE and Cournot models. In: International conference “The European Electricity Market EEM-07”. pp 151–158Google Scholar
  11. Weron R (2006) Modelling and forecasting electricity loads and prices: a statistical approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Weron R (2008) Market price of risk implied by Asian-style electricity options and futures. Energy Econ 30: 1098–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdalena Borgosz-Koczwara
    • 1
  • Aleksander Weron
    • 2
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Industrial Engineering and ManagementWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland
  2. 2.Hugo Steinhaus Center, Institute of Mathematics and Computer ScienceWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations