Advertisement

Metrika

, Volume 81, Issue 5, pp 569–586 | Cite as

Shrinkage estimation in linear mixed models for longitudinal data

  • Shakhawat Hossain
  • Trevor Thomson
  • Ejaz Ahmed
Article
  • 147 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the selection and estimation of fixed effects in linear mixed models while the random effects are treated as nuisance parameters. We propose the non-penalty James–Stein shrinkage and pretest estimation methods based on linear mixed models for longitudinal data when some of the fixed effect parameters are under a linear restriction. We establish the asymptotic distributional biases and risks of the proposed estimators, and investigate their relative performance with respect to the unrestricted maximum likelihood estimator (UE). Furthermore, we investigate the penalty (LASSO and adaptive LASSO) estimation methods and compare their relative performance with the non-penalty pretest and shrinkage estimators. A simulation study for various combinations of the inactive covariates shows that the shrinkage estimators perform better than the penalty estimators in certain parts of the parameter space. This particularly happens when there are many inactive covariates in the model. It also shows that the pretest, shrinkage, and penalty estimators all outperform the UE. We further illustrate the proposed procedures via a real data example.

Keywords

Asymptotic distributional bias and risk Linear mixed model Likelihood ratio test LASSO Monte Carlo simulation Shrinkage and pretest estimators 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referees, editor and associate editor for their valuable suggestions in the revision of this paper. The research of Shakhawat Hossain and Ejaz Ahmed was supported by the Natural Sciences and the Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Ahmed SE, Rohatgi VJ (1996) Shrinkage estimation in a randomized response model. Metrika 43:17–30MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed SE, Hussein A, Sen PK (2006) Risk comparison of some shrinkage M-estimators in linear models. J Nonparametr Stat 18(3):401–415MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed SE, Hossain S, Doksum KA (2012) LASSO and shrinkage estimation in Weibull censored regression models. J Stat Plan Inference 142(6):1273–1284MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn M, Zhang HH, Lu W (2012) Moment-based method for random effects selection in linear mixed models. Stat Sin 22(4):1539–1562MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondell HD, Krishna A, Ghosh SK (2010) Joint variable selection for fixed and random effects in linear mixed-effects models. Biometrics 66(4):1069–1077MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Datta G, Ghosh M (2012) Small area shrinkage estimation. Stat Sci 27(1):95–114MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL (2002) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan J, Li R (2001) Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc 96(456):1348–1360MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan YY, Li RZ (2012) Variable selection in linear mixed effects models. Ann Stat 40(4):2043–2068MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH (2011) Longitudinal data analysis. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao X, Ahmed SE, Fen Y (2017) Post selection shrinkage estimation for high-dimensional data analysis. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 33:97–120MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Gumedze FN, Dunne TT (2011) Parameter estimation and inference in the linear mixed model. Linear Algebra Appl 435(8):1920–1944MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta A, Saleh AKME, Sen PK (1989) Improved estimation in a contingency table: independence structure. J Am Stat Assoc 84(406):525–532MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Harville D (1977) Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc 358:320–340MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD (2006) Longitudinal data analysis. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Hossain S, Doksum KA, Ahmed SE (2009) Positive-part shrinkage and absolute penalty estimators in partially linear models. Linear Algebra Appl 430:2749–2761MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Hossain S, Ahmed SE, Doksum KA (2015) Shrinkage, \(l_1\) penalty and pretest estimators for generalized linear models. Stat Methodol 24:52–68MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hossain S, Ahmed SE, Yi Y, Chen B (2016) Shrinkage and pretest estimators for longitudinal data analysis under partially linear models. J Nonparametr Stat 28(3):531–549MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Ibrahim JG, Zhu HT, Garcia R, Guo RX (2011) Fixed and random effects selection in mixed effects models. Biometrics 67(2):495–503MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Judge GG, Bock ME (1978) The statistical implication of pretest and Stein-rule estimators in econometrics. North-Holland, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Judge GG, Mittelhammaer RC (2004) A semiparametric basis for combining estimation problem under quadratic loss. J Am Stat Assoc 99(466):479–487MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemper HCG (1995) The Amsterdam Growth Study: a longitudinal analysis of health, fitness and lifestyle. HK Sport Science Monograph Series, vol 6. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  23. Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38(4):963–974CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM (1988) Newton–Raphson and EM algorithms for linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. J Am Stat Assoc 83(404):1014–1022MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Longford NT (1993) Random coefficient models. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JR (2008) Generalized, linear, and mixed models, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Müller S, Scealy JL, Welsh AH (2013) Model selection in linear mixed models. Stat Sci 28(2):135–167MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Pan J, Shang J (2017) Adaptive LASSO for linear mixed model selection via profile log-likelihood. Commun Stat Theory Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1332219 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Peng H, Lu Y (2012) Model selection in linear mixed effect models. J Multivar Anal 109:109–129MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Schelldorfer J, Bühlmann P, van de Geer S (2011) Estimation for high-dimensional linear mixed effects models using \(l_1\)-penalization. Scand J Stat 38(2):197–214MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (2006) Variance components. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomson T, Hossain S, Ghahramani M (2015) Application of shrinkage estimation in linear regression models with autoregressive errors. J Stat Comput Simul 85(16):1580–1592MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58(1):267–288MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Twisk JWR (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology—a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2009) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer Series in Statistics: corrected edition, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeng T, Hill RC (2016) Shrinkage estimation in the random parameters logit model. Open J Stat 6:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zou H (2006) The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc 101(476):1418–1429MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of WinnipegWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations