Advertisement

Metrika

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 295–311 | Cite as

Investigating design for survival models

  • J. M. McGreeEmail author
  • J. A. Eccleston
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to derive methodology for designing ‘time to event’ type experiments. In comparison to estimation, design aspects of ‘time to event’ experiments have received relatively little attention. We show that gains in efficiency of estimators of parameters and use of experimental material can be made using optimal design theory. The types of models considered include classical failure data and accelerated testing situations, and frailty models, each involving covariates which influence the outcome. The objective is to construct an optimal design based of the values of the covariates and associated model or indeed a candidate set of models. We consider D-optimality and create compound optimality criteria to derive optimal designs for multi-objective situations which, for example, focus on the number of failures as well as the estimation of parameters. The approach is motivated and demonstrated using common failure/survival models, for example, the Weibull distribution, product assessment and frailty models.

Keywords

Accelerated life tests Compound criteria Compromise design D-optimality Frailty models P-optimality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson AC (2008) DT-optimum designs for model discrimination and parameter estimation. J Stat Plan Inference 138: 56–64zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson AC, Donev AN (1992) Optimum experimental designs, 1st edn. Oxford University Press Inc., OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (2003) Case studies in reliability and maintenance. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaloner K, Larntz K (1992) Bayesian design for accelerated life testing. J Stat Plan Inference 33: 245–259zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clyde M, Chaloner K (1996) The equivalence of constrained and weighted designs in multiple objective design problems. J Am Stat Assoc 91: 1236–1244zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook RD, Wong WK (1994) On the equivalence of constrained and compound optimal designs. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 687–692zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Cramér H (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 474–477zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Crouchley R, Pickles AR (1995) Multivariate survival models for repeated and correlated events. J Stat Plan Inference 47: 95–110zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danziger L (1970) Planning censored life tests for estimation of the hazard rate of a Weibull distribution with prescribed precision. Technometrics 12: 408–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Argenio DZ (1981) Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9: 739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duffull SB, Waterhouse TH, Eccleston JA (2005) Some considerations on the design of population pharmacokinetic studies. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 32: 441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erkanli A, Soyer R (2000) Simulation-based designs for accelerated life tests. J Stat Plan Inference 90: 335–348zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Escobar LA, Meeker WQ Jr (1986) Elements of the Fisher information matrix for the smallest extreme value distribution and censored data. Appl Stat 35: 80–86zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Escobar LA, Meeker WQ Jr (1994) Fisher information matrix for the extreme value, normal and logistic distributions and censored data. Appl Stat 43: 533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Escobar LA, Meeker WQ Jr (1995) Planning accelerated life tests with two or more experimental factors. Technometrics 37: 411–427zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Escobar LA, Meeker WQ Jr (1998) Fisher information matrices with censoring, truncation, and explanatory variables. Stat Sin 8: 221–237zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutierrez RG (2002) Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models. Stata J 2: 22–44Google Scholar
  19. Hougaard P (1995) Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 1: 255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang YC, Wong WK (1998) Multiple-objective optimal designs. J Biopharm Stat 8: 635–643zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang WT, Brookmeyer R (2003) Design of panel studies for disease progression with multiple stages. Lifetime Data Anal 9: 261–274zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis—techniques for censored and truncated data, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. McGilchrist CA, Aisbett CW (1991) Regression with frailty in survival analysis. Biometrics 47: 461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGree JM, Eccleston JA, Duffull SB (2008) Compound optimal design criteria for nonlinear models. J Biopharm Stat 18: 646–661CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. McGree JM, Eccleston JA (2008) Probability-based optimal design. Aust New Zealand J Stat 50: 13–28CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Meeker WQ, Escobar LA (1998) Statistical methods for reliability data. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Meeker WQ, Escobar LA, Zayac SA (2003) Use of sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of model uncertainty in analyzing accelerated life test data. In: Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (eds) Case studies in reliability and maintenance. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York, pp. 135–162Google Scholar
  28. Nelson W, Kielpinski T (1976) Theory for optimum censored accelerated life tests for normal and lognormal distributions. Technometrics 18: 105–114zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson W, Meeker WQ (1978) Theory for optimum accelerated censored life tests for Weibull and Extreme value distributions. Technometrics 20: 171–177zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Onar A, Padgett WJ (2004) A penalized local D-optimality approach to design for accelerated test models. J Stat Plan Inference 119: 411–420zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Shih JH, Louis TA (1995) Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data. Lifetime Data Anal 1: 205–220zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Waterhouse TH (2005) Optimal experimental design for nonlinear and generalized linear models. Ph.D. thesis, University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  33. Waterhouse TH, Eccleston JA, Duffull SB (2006) Optimal crossover designs for logistic regression models in pharmacodynamics. J Biopharm Stat 16: 881–894CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Woods DC, Lewis SM, Eccleston JA, Russell KG (2006) Designs for generalized linear models with several variables and model uncertainty. Technometrics 48: 284–292CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang Y, Meeker WQ (2005) Bayesian life test planning for the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter. Metrika 61: 237–249zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Y, Meeker WQ (2006) Bayesian methods for planning accelerated life tests. Technometrics 48: 49–60CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations