Skip to main content
Log in

Decentralized versus collective bargaining – An experimental study

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Two parties X, and Y, can either bargain separately with a third party Z or merge to become XY and bargain collectively with Z. Depending on the payoff implications of the two possible contracts and on the asymmetry inherent in the conflict payoffs of X and Y collective bargaining will increase, decrease or leave constant what X and Y achieve together. In the experiment, first X and Y vote for or against collective bargaining and then negotiate accordingly. Participants react adequately to strategic aspects, but not as predicted by the (Nash-)bargaining solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: April 2000/Final version: December 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berninghaus, S., Güth, W., Lechler, R. et al. Decentralized versus collective bargaining – An experimental study. Game Theory 30, 437–448 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200089

Navigation