Abstract.
Two parties X, and Y, can either bargain separately with a third party Z or merge to become XY and bargain collectively with Z. Depending on the payoff implications of the two possible contracts and on the asymmetry inherent in the conflict payoffs of X and Y collective bargaining will increase, decrease or leave constant what X and Y achieve together. In the experiment, first X and Y vote for or against collective bargaining and then negotiate accordingly. Participants react adequately to strategic aspects, but not as predicted by the (Nash-)bargaining solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: April 2000/Final version: December 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berninghaus, S., Güth, W., Lechler, R. et al. Decentralized versus collective bargaining – An experimental study. Game Theory 30, 437–448 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200089
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200089